Free host speculation...? - GoFuckYourself.com

gkk · 01-09-2002, 01:02 AM

Does anyone have any ideas/data about this... I was wondering, if you consider ALL revenue generated by the galleries on a free host (i.e. the revenue going to the hosting company + the revenue earned by the webmasters) would it be:-

A) MUCH less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host
B) Less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host
C) About the same
D) More, etc.
E) Much more, etc.

In other words, does the revenue from gallery sponsors + host sponsors <=> the revenue one could make from the SAME galleries if they were "clean"?

pr0 · 01-09-2002, 01:04 AM

Its all about the $...if you have the $ to send it to your own host & take the first few months as a loss....your cool. If you don't then you use freehosts.

Either way you make $....its cool

But i'd say your own clean galleries are much better.

The Truth · 01-09-2002, 01:05 AM

hahaha... very generic question...

Some people can make enough to host their own galls and some can't even make enough to pay a phone bill on free hosts... and some free hosts have it figured out and can make their money off a few smart sponsor links and some can't so they 404 like mad or just close the doors.

------------------
Make $$$ the All New Diabolical Way

gkk · 01-09-2002, 02:07 AM

You see, my train of thought went something like this...

IF you know enough to make money off CLEAN galleries

AND

most TGP lists accept "relatively clean" galleries i.e. galleries with light headers

THEN

would you be better off pretending to be on a freehost i.e. putting a (slightly smaller than the *real* freehosts) header and footer on every gallery.

Would this make more, the same or less money than leaving the clean galleries unadorned with headers and footers?

Or is this just TOO devious?

Mango · 01-09-2002, 02:30 AM

Keep in mind that TGP's tend to accept more galleries from a paid host than a free host.

Reasons : better uptime, faster servers (in most of the cases), less banners, less 404's, ...

------------------
CobaltWeb - High Volume Hosting - $0.70-$0.61 per GB - Plans from $13.99 per Month - No Setup Fee
---The End of Free Hosting---

01-09-2002, 01:02 AM	#1
gkk Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 169	Free host speculation...? Does anyone have any ideas/data about this... I was wondering, if you consider ALL revenue generated by the galleries on a free host (i.e. the revenue going to the hosting company + the revenue earned by the webmasters) would it be:- A) MUCH less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host B) Less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host C) About the same D) More, etc. E) Much more, etc. In other words, does the revenue from gallery sponsors + host sponsors <=> the revenue one could make from the SAME galleries if they were "clean"?

01-09-2002, 01:04 AM	#2
pr0 rockin tha trailerpark Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: ~Coastal~ Posts: 23,088	Its all about the $...if you have the $ to send it to your own host & take the first few months as a loss....your cool. If you don't then you use freehosts. Either way you make $....its cool But i'd say your own clean galleries are much better.

01-09-2002, 01:05 AM	#3
The Truth Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: U.S.of A. Posts: 920	hahaha... very generic question... Some people can make enough to host their own galls and some can't even make enough to pay a phone bill on free hosts... and some free hosts have it figured out and can make their money off a few smart sponsor links and some can't so they 404 like mad or just close the doors. ------------------ Make $$$ the All New Diabolical Way

01-09-2002, 02:07 AM	#4
gkk Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 169	You see, my train of thought went something like this... IF you know enough to make money off CLEAN galleries AND most TGP lists accept "relatively clean" galleries i.e. galleries with light headers THEN would you be better off pretending to be on a freehost i.e. putting a (slightly smaller than the real freehosts) header and footer on every gallery. Would this make more, the same or less money than leaving the clean galleries unadorned with headers and footers? Or is this just TOO devious?

01-09-2002, 02:30 AM	#5
Mango Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 474	Keep in mind that TGP's tend to accept more galleries from a paid host than a free host. Reasons : better uptime, faster servers (in most of the cases), less banners, less 404's, ... ------------------ CobaltWeb - High Volume Hosting - $0.70-$0.61 per GB - Plans from $13.99 per Month - No Setup Fee ---The End of Free Hosting---