Bill Gates Solution To Spam. - GoFuckYourself.com

Darren · 02-01-2004, 06:50 PM

Mark my words it will be Outlook with Spam Arrest in it....

No need to login to spamarrest to authorize senders, no need to upload address books...

all done by outlook...

DeanCapture · 02-01-2004, 06:52 PM

You have a better solution?

Darren · 02-01-2004, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DeanCapture
You have a better solution?

nope i think the above solution is brilliant and by far the best way, with some additional features its perfect.

SpamArrest does the job excellently but it is an hassle having to login and authroize everytime u signup to say a messageboard etc, with it all in one place its just one click...

Can anyone compete?? Well SpamArrest could right now... but it will be hard cuz outlook is obviously on many many computers already....

Darren · 02-01-2004, 06:59 PM

justw anted to get it down so in 2 years i can come back and point it out!

webair · 02-01-2004, 07:04 PM

personally, i think he bit off a little more than he can chew:

One innovative idea ? and we need more information here ? is to gauge the cost of sending an e-mail according to the recipient's reaction. As reported in the (U.K.) Independent, Gates said the most promising was a method that would hit the sender in the pocket. People would set a level of monetary risk ? low or high, depending on their own choice ? for receiving e-mail from strangers. If the e-mail turned out to be from a long-lost relative, for example, the recipient would charge nothing. But if it is unwanted spam, the sender would have to fork out the cash.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._ptinbo31.html

bvds · 02-01-2004, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by webair
personally, i think he bit off a little more than he can chew:

One innovative idea ? and we need more information here ? is to gauge the cost of sending an e-mail according to the recipient's reaction. As reported in the (U.K.) Independent, Gates said the most promising was a method that would hit the sender in the pocket. People would set a level of monetary risk ? low or high, depending on their own choice ? for receiving e-mail from strangers. If the e-mail turned out to be from a long-lost relative, for example, the recipient would charge nothing. But if it is unwanted spam, the sender would have to fork out the cash.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._ptinbo31.html

GREAT IDEA!
I'll be rich in no time
I'll ask everyone to email me and charge them all $10 000 per email!!!

webair · 02-01-2004, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bvds

GREAT IDEA!
I'll be rich in no time
I'll ask everyone to email me and charge them all $10 000 per email!!!

go get em

02-01-2004, 06:50 PM	#1
Darren Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 5,994	Bill Gates Solution To Spam. Mark my words it will be Outlook with Spam Arrest in it.... No need to login to spamarrest to authorize senders, no need to upload address books... all done by outlook... __________________ Penis enlargement / male enhancement pills - earn up to $229.48 per signup ICQ: 46335817

02-01-2004, 06:52 PM	#2
DeanCapture Haters & Trolls SUCK! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 9,275	You have a better solution? __________________ Twitter: @DeanCapture Instagram: @TheDeanCapture DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

02-01-2004, 06:59 PM	#4
Darren Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 5,994	justw anted to get it down so in 2 years i can come back and point it out! __________________ Penis enlargement / male enhancement pills - earn up to $229.48 per signup ICQ: 46335817

02-01-2004, 07:04 PM	#5
webair Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: NYC, NY Posts: 8,531	personally, i think he bit off a little more than he can chew: One innovative idea ? and we need more information here ? is to gauge the cost of sending an e-mail according to the recipient's reaction. As reported in the (U.K.) Independent, Gates said the most promising was a method that would hit the sender in the pocket. People would set a level of monetary risk ? low or high, depending on their own choice ? for receiving e-mail from strangers. If the e-mail turned out to be from a long-lost relative, for example, the recipient would charge nothing. But if it is unwanted spam, the sender would have to fork out the cash. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._ptinbo31.html __________________ ~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Servers™ ~ WEBAIR VSYS™ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~ ~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~ *ICQ:* 243116321 - *TWITTER* - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]