Judge orders return of stripper's 1 Million Dollars - GoFuckYourself.com

lezinterracial · 07-23-2013, 02:01 PM

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs...151044009.html

Awesome judge.

Quote:

A federal judge has ruled that Nebraska cops must return over $1 million confiscated at a traffic stop from a woman who saved the money $1 at a time during her 15 year career as an exotic dancer.

Quote:

K-9 analysis found only trace elements of illegal drugs on the cash

Maybe the the dog confused the smell of vagina with drugs.

woj · 07-23-2013, 02:09 PM

million in cash in a trunk of a rented car... sounds legit...

purecane · 07-23-2013, 02:10 PM

try explaining that to your pimp....

Jman · 07-23-2013, 02:11 PM

Hummm IRS will be pleased to see that now that she as money back she can pay Sam's share of that mill.

_Richard_ · 07-23-2013, 02:17 PM

so they found trace amounts of blow on 100 bills

so much for law

D Ghost · 07-23-2013, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jman

Hummm IRS will be pleased to see that now that she as money back she can pay Sam's share of that mill.

lol

NaughtyRob · 07-23-2013, 03:23 PM

Stripper SAVING $. Oh yeah thats legit. haha

marlboroack · 07-23-2013, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob

Stripper SAVING $. Oh yeah thats legit. haha

Strippers know how to save money if they don't have a drug addiction.

Robbie · 07-23-2013, 03:34 PM

It shouldn't be ANY of the cops or the govt's business how much money a person has.

That people think it's "okay" just blows my mind.

The govt. is supposed to work FOR you...not run your life.

Brad Mitchell · 07-23-2013, 07:26 PM

Lots of bills especially larger ones always have trace amounts of drugs.. And feces, lol, lots of germs. It's not their business but she deserves an audit if she hasn't paid taxes in the range of being consistent with having that much cash in her possession.

And for the record... I've met a career dancer with a million dollars in assets, more than half in cash. And it wasn't from drugs or prostitution. I'm guessing she's the 1:1,000,000

Brad

georgeyw · 07-23-2013, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell

Lots of bills especially larger ones always have trace amounts of drugs.. And feces, lol, lots of germs. It's not their business but she deserves an audit if she hasn't paid taxes in the range of being consistent with having that much cash in her possession.

And for the record... I've met a career dancer with a million dollars in assets, more than half in cash. And it wasn't from drugs or prostitution. I'm guessing she's the 1:1,000,000

Brad

This!

Fucking police are thieves!

Aidoru · 07-23-2013, 07:50 PM

Must have been a pain counting all those 1's

Phoenix · 07-23-2013, 09:37 PM

i know some working girls...who rake it in large...never drink..dont do drugs
they buy property...and pay it off

1 is retired already..32
the other another year or so i guess

AllAboutCams · 07-23-2013, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i know some working girls...who rake it in large...never drink..dont do drugs
they buy property...and pay it off

1 is retired already..32
the other another year or so i guess

32 when did she start 30

PornDiscounts-V · 07-24-2013, 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jman

Hummm IRS will be pleased to see that now that she as money back she can pay Sam's share of that mill.

Read the story from a real news outlet:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ugs-money.html

Part of the judges decision rested on the fact that she had paid taxes on the money. That million was the left over proceeds.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 07-24-2013, 02:17 AM

ADG

Lykos · 07-24-2013, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marlboroack

Strippers know how to save money if they don't have a drug addiction.

This make sense...

pornguy · 07-24-2013, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lezinterracial

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs...151044009.html

Awesome judge.

Maybe the the dog confused the smell of vagina with drugs.

There was a report once that in Miami you could get high with the trace amounts of cocaine on 50$ bills.

Jman · 07-24-2013, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

Read the story from a real news outlet:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ugs-money.html

Part of the judges decision rested on the fact that she had paid taxes on the money. That million was the left over proceeds.

Holy Hell How can that be????

There is no such thing as a honest stripper LOLOL

crockett · 07-24-2013, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

It shouldn't be ANY of the cops or the govt's business how much money a person has.

That people think it's "okay" just blows my mind.

The govt. is supposed to work FOR you...not run your life.

I've always found it disturbing that cops can seize money if you are carrying a lot of cash. They claim it must be drug related, which is bull shit.

Should be unconstitutional and why the hell should she have to go to the legal system to get it back.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

I've always found it disturbing that cops can seize money if you are carrying a lot of cash. They claim it must be drug related, which is bull shit.

Should be unconstitutional and why the hell should she have to go to the legal system to get it back.

I agree...

I would imagine that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and the rest of the Founding Fathers of this country never envisioned the things that our local, state, and federal govt's do to people in 2013

_Richard_ · 07-24-2013, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by georgeyw

This!

Fucking police are thieves!

its a big racket for em.. especially highway patrols

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 08:58 AM

Nixon's "War On Drugs" has turned into the biggest excuse for authorities to just do damn near anything they want to people. And has ended up with the United States incarcerating more of it's citizens than any country on Earth now or in all of history.

slapass · 07-24-2013, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

It shouldn't be ANY of the cops or the govt's business how much money a person has.

That people think it's "okay" just blows my mind.

The govt. is supposed to work FOR you...not run your life.

You do get that this was illegal money right? No way she saved a million in suitcase over the last ten years. You do gt that?

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass

You do get that this was illegal money right? No way she saved a million in suitcase over the last ten years. You do gt that?

What are you talking about? Last I checked money is "legal".

The police should have no right to stop you and take your money. Period.

If the police suspect someone is doing something "illegal", then they should do an investigation and arrest that person if it turns out to be true.

Just taking the money from anybody who has a lot of it? If I did that to you, it would be called "theft".

They literally pulled a car over for speeding, searched the car (which should be unconstitutional and WAS until a couple of decades ago when the Supreme Court started falling in line with "the war on drugs" and tossing our privacy and freedom out the window), and then took that girl's money.

They basically fucked her over. She was trying to use that money to invest in a business.
IF you have ever had a chance to invest in a business oportunity, then you know that she lost that particular opportunity.

She needed to invest at that moment. AND...the people she might have been about to do the business deal with, would no longer want anything to do with her anyway after being involved with the police...even IF they would have waited over a year (that's how long it took for her to get her money back).

woj · 07-24-2013, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

What are you talking about? Last I checked money is "legal".

The police should have no right to stop you and take your money. Period.

If the police suspect someone is doing something "illegal", then they should do an investigation and arrest that person if it turns out to be true.

Just taking the money from anybody who has a lot of it? If I did that to you, it would be called "theft".

They literally pulled a car over for speeding, searched the car (which should be unconstitutional and WAS until a couple of decades ago when the Supreme Court started falling in line with "the war on drugs" and tossing our privacy and freedom out the window), and then took that girl's money.

They basically fucked her over. She was trying to use that money to invest in a business.
IF you have ever had a chance to invest in a business oportunity, then you know that she lost that particular opportunity.

She needed to invest at that moment. AND...the people she might have been about to do the business deal with, would no longer want anything to do with her anyway after being involved with the police...even IF they would have waited over a year (that's how long it took for her to get her money back).

it reeks of some crime from a mile away... perhaps not necessarily drugs related, but probably tax evasion or some other crime... chances that that money is 100% legit is 1 in a million...

we can argue whether they had the right to search her car, seize the funds, etc... but we both know damn well that chances that money is legit is slim to none.... or do you honestly believe that money is 100% clean, all taxes paid on it, etc?

sperbonzo · 07-24-2013, 10:21 AM

How the hell is it the government's business if I decide to carry my money in cash and not trust a bank.... And what is having x amount of cash proof of wrong doing??? It's insane that there are so many people OK with government seizures of cash these days

.

sandman! · 07-24-2013, 10:26 AM

good for her

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

it reeks of some crime from a mile away... perhaps not necessarily drugs related, but probably tax evasion or some other crime... chances that that money is 100% legit is 1 in a million...

we can argue whether they had the right to search her car, seize the funds, etc... but we both know damn well that chances that money is legit is slim to none.... or do you honestly believe that money is 100% clean, all taxes paid on it, etc?

Well thanks for you legal opinion...but first of all: The cops shouldn't be able to do that to anybody.

Second of all...after over a year went by and her business opportunity that she had worked all her life towards was down the drain...the Judge FINALLY said that the money was 100% legally made and taxes paid on it (I guess you may not have read the story).

So the govt., instead of serving the people...once again proved itself to be harassing and a detriment to new business being started. AND basically stole her money for a year (though IF you read the story you would see that the Judge ordered interest to be paid to her for them having her money that long).

L-Pink · 07-24-2013, 11:59 AM

Great. Boiled down to facts we have one Indian transferring money from a cash business to another Indian about to buy another cash business.

Glad my tax money goes to support an environment where so many from other countries can beat the system.

SilentKnight · 07-24-2013, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

How the hell is it the government's business if I decide to carry my money in cash and not trust a bank.... And what is having x amount of cash proof of wrong doing??? It's insane that there are so many people OK with government seizures of cash these days

.

Agreed.

And where do they draw this imaginary confiscation line? So...a million is okay to just seize without justification. How about $500k? Or $100k?

In principle...and although it may sound ridiculous - why not confiscate your lunch money, too.

Creatine · 07-24-2013, 12:55 PM

Fuck that's a lot of money.

theking · 07-24-2013, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

its a big racket for em.. especially highway patrols

Pigshit.

theking · 07-24-2013, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Agreed.

And where do they draw this imaginary confiscation line? So...a million is okay to just seize without justification. How about $500k? Or $100k?

In principle...and although it may sound ridiculous - why not confiscate your lunch money, too.

$10,000 or above.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

$10,000 or above.

If a cop had tried to take Thomas Jefferson's cash off of him by telling him to get out of his carriage and they were going to search it...Jefferson would have gotten a rope and found the first tree and hung that son-of-a-bitch.

They are supposed to be public SERVANTS. Not act like mini-Gods and ruin your life at their discretion.

theking · 07-24-2013, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

If a cop had tried to take Thomas Jefferson's cash off of him by telling him to get out of his carriage and they were going to search it...Jefferson would have gotten a rope and found the first tree and hung that son-of-a-bitch.

They are supposed to be public SERVANTS. Not act like mini-Gods and ruin your life at their discretion.

It is the people that support the politicians that make the laws...so blame the voters not the cops. The government only has the power that the people allow them to have.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

It is the people that support the politicians that make the laws...so blame the voters not the cops. The government only has the power that the people allow them to have.

Not true...the Supreme Court gave them these powers over the last couple of decades to support the "War On Drugs"
They have given cops pretty much unlimited powers to do any damn thing they want to...and they do.

I remember very clearly in the 1970's and 1980's that cops couldn't search my car or me. They couldn't go into my wife's purse etc.
And real cops? They will search you, frisk you, talk to you like you are a dog...and if you ask they "why" it just pisses them off.
Hell, You go to a fucking concert and you have non-cops searching your wife's purse and running wands over you.

Disgusting.

Thank you Richard Nixon for the "War On Drugs" and subsequent jailing of more citizens in the United States than ANY country on Earth in all of history.

Google it up for yourself. Prison industry is a multi-billion dollar corporate monster. And the cops are the ones who keep it supplied.

theking · 07-24-2013, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Not true...the Supreme Court gave them these powers over the last couple of decades to support the "War On Drugs"
They have given cops pretty much unlimited powers to do any damn thing they want to...and they do.

I remember very clearly in the 1970's and 1980's that cops couldn't search my car or me. They couldn't go into my wife's purse etc.
And real cops? They will search you, frisk you, talk to you like you are a dog...and if you ask they "why" it just pisses them off.
Hell, You go to a fucking concert and you have non-cops searching your wife's purse and running wands over you.

Disgusting.

Thank you Richard Nixon for the "War On Drugs" and subsequent jailing of more citizens in the United States than ANY country on Earth in all of history.

Google it up for yourself. Prison industry is a multi-billion dollar corporate monster. And the cops are the ones who keep it supplied.

The Supreme Court does not "give" powers or make law...the Supreme Court makes a decision as to a law...made by the law makers that the people support...being constitutional or not.

Jel · 07-24-2013, 03:08 PM

Hope she sues those cunts for distress, loss of potential earnings, and any other bs she can tack on.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

The Supreme Court does not "give" powers or make law...the Supreme Court makes a decision as to a law...made by the law makers that the people support...being constitutional or not.

Are you deliberately trolling or something?

THE SUPREME COURT ruled it was constitutional for police to search your car, search YOU, search your wifes purse, take people's property and money if they "suspected" it has anything to do with drugs.

Has nothing to do with politicians and everything to do with cops. The minute the Supreme Court made those rulings....every law enforcement agency in America started doing it.

Fuck man...pay attention to what's going on around you.

Up until the Supreme Court started making those "war on drugs" type rulings starting in the late 1980's...they could not do that and did not do that.

Just Alex · 07-24-2013, 03:27 PM

Any pictures of this stripper?

theking · 07-24-2013, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Are you deliberately trolling or something?

THE SUPREME COURT ruled it was constitutional for police to search your car, search YOU, search your wifes purse, take people's property and money if they "suspected" it has anything to do with drugs.

Has nothing to do with politicians and everything to do with cops. The minute the Supreme Court made those rulings....every law enforcement agency in America started doing it.

Fuck man...pay attention to what's going on around you.

Up until the Supreme Court started making those "war on drugs" type rulings starting in the late 1980's...they could not do that and did not do that.

No I am not trolling you. I have...and do...pay very close attention to every thing that goes on around me. I know very well how our system of governance works which includes the Supreme Court and its rulings...sport.

JP513 · 07-24-2013, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purecane

try explaining that to your pimp....

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

No I am not trolling you. I have...and do...pay very close attention to every thing that goes on around me. I know very well how our system of governance works which includes the Supreme Court and its rulings...sport.

Please don't call me "sport". It's disrespectful. And if you know the Supreme Court made those rulings then WHY would you argue with me about it?

Makes zero sense.

theking · 07-24-2013, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Please don't call me "sport". It's disrespectful. And if you know the Supreme Court made those rulings then WHY would you argue with me about it?

Makes zero sense.

Because you told me that what I posted is not true and of course it is true...so it is you that is arguing with me. Reread my posts and your responses.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Because you told me that what I posted is not true and of course it is true...so it is you that is arguing with me. Reread my posts and your responses.

Fuck...what part of the cops could not search you or your car or take your money UNTIL the Supreme Court ruled that they could as part of the "war on drugs"?

Yes, politicians make laws. No, they don't make law enforcement protocol.

theking · 07-24-2013, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Fuck...what part of the cops could not search you or your car or take your money UNTIL the Supreme Court ruled that they could as part of the "war on drugs"?

Yes, politicians make laws. No, they don't make law enforcement protocol.

Yes politicians make laws...law enforcement acts upon those laws...some one challenges either the law or the ways law enforcement acts upon those laws...the challenge works its way through the courts to the Federal Supreme Court. The Supreme Court then rules... either upon the law or the way law enforcement acted upon the law...or both. It is those nine members of the court that decide whether or not the law...or the way law enforcement acted upon the law...is constitutional or not.

Thus as I previously stated...

"It is the people that support the politicians that make the laws...so blame the voters not the cops. The government only has the power that the people allow them to have."

The government consists of three branches...the Executive...the Congress...and the Judicial. The people elect the President (the Executive)...the members of both houses of Congress...and the Executive (whom the people elected) nominates the members of the Supreme Court and the Congress (whom the people elected) either approves or disapproves the nominee.

The power of the government...which makes the laws...and the power of the Judicial which upholds the law...is all approved and supported by the people...via their votes...or via their silence. Government by the people and for the people.

Of course not all of the people are happy with the government. There is absolutely no way to please more than three hundred million people. There will always be millions of people unhappy with the government and its laws...but conversely the majority are usually somewhat pleased with the government and its laws.

Of course I am aware that you are aware of all of what I have said...so you really do not have an argument with me.

Robbie · 07-24-2013, 09:42 PM

You aren't even talking about the same thing as I am.

Law enforcment protocol has nothing to do with what you are talking about.

Politicians don't make laws telling cops to pull you out of your car, search your car, frisk you like a criminal, etc.

Politicians making laws VS The Supreme Court telling cops that it IS constitutional for them to search you, search your car, AND take your money if they "suspect" it "might" be "drug money"

I'm not discussing the LAW. The draconian drug laws were already jacked up when Nixon declared "War On Drugs"

The ONLY difference I'm talking about, as related to what happened to this woman and her money...is that the Supreme Court ruled it was constitutional for cops to do what they did.

I really have ZERO idea of why you are continuing this.

You're talking about laws put in place by bureaucrats. I'm talking about the constitutionality of cops being able to do what they did to that woman because the Supreme Court made those rulings a couple of decades ago.

You aren't even having the same discussion as I am.

theking · 07-24-2013, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

You aren't even talking about the same thing as I am.

Law enforcment protocol has nothing to do with what you are talking about.

Politicians don't make laws telling cops to pull you out of your car, search your car, frisk you like a criminal, etc.

Politicians making laws VS The Supreme Court telling cops that it IS constitutional for them to search you, search your car, AND take your money if they "suspect" it "might" be "drug money"

I'm not discussing the LAW. The draconian drug laws were already jacked up when Nixon declared "War On Drugs"

The ONLY difference I'm talking about, as related to what happened to this woman and her money...is that the Supreme Court ruled it was constitutional for cops to do what they did.

I really have ZERO idea of why you are continuing this.

You're talking about laws put in place by bureaucrats. I'm talking about the constitutionality of cops being able to do what they did to that woman because the Supreme Court made those rulings a couple of decades ago.

You aren't even having the same discussion as I am.

Laws are made then law enforcement act upon those laws. Law enforcement did not take it upon themselves to start searching cars or sizing money etc. etc. etc. until law makers passed laws saying they could do so...in the "war" against whatever...and they would have stopped doing so if the Supreme Court had ruled that the law or the way they were enforcing the law was/is unconstitutional. The Court certainly does not make law enforcement protocol.

shimmy2 · 07-24-2013, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Great. Boiled down to facts we have one Indian transferring money from a cash business to another Indian about to buy another cash business.

Glad my tax money goes to support an environment where so many from other countries can beat the system.

paper trails always lead back to sovereign indian tribes

07-23-2013, 02:09 PM	#2
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	million in cash in a trunk of a rented car... sounds legit... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

07-23-2013, 02:10 PM	#3
purecane Annakin Skywalker Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: megaminds' secret lair Posts: 1,324	try explaining that to your pimp.... __________________ [email protected]

07-23-2013, 02:11 PM	#4
Jman Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Canuckstikan Posts: 22,761	Hummm IRS will be pleased to see that now that she as money back she can pay Sam's share of that mill. __________________ email: [email protected] Best AI Affiliate Program We also do WL at $0.00 upfront costs FantasyXXX.AI Teams: jean.francois.laverdiere TG: @jman1216

07-23-2013, 03:23 PM	#7
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	Stripper SAVING $. Oh yeah thats legit. haha __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

07-23-2013, 03:34 PM	#9
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	It shouldn't be ANY of the cops or the govt's business how much money a person has. That people think it's "okay" just blows my mind. The govt. is supposed to work FOR you...not run your life. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

07-23-2013, 02:17 PM	#5
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	so they found trace amounts of blow on 100 bills so much for law

07-23-2013, 07:26 PM	#10
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,812	Lots of bills especially larger ones always have trace amounts of drugs.. And feces, lol, lots of germs. It's not their business but she deserves an audit if she hasn't paid taxes in the range of being consistent with having that much cash in her possession. And for the record... I've met a career dancer with a million dollars in assets, more than half in cash. And it wasn't from drugs or prostitution. I'm guessing she's the 1:1,000,000 Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999

07-23-2013, 07:50 PM	#12
Aidoru Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 655	Must have been a pain counting all those 1's __________________ Gravurecash - 50% Lifetime RevShare on all signups and rebills, 5% Webmaster Referral

07-23-2013, 09:37 PM	#13
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	i know some working girls...who rake it in large...never drink..dont do drugs they buy property...and pay it off 1 is retired already..32 the other another year or so i guess __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

07-24-2013, 02:17 AM	#16
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

07-24-2013, 08:58 AM	#23
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	Nixon's "War On Drugs" has turned into the biggest excuse for authorities to just do damn near anything they want to people. And has ended up with the United States incarcerating more of it's citizens than any country on Earth now or in all of history. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

07-24-2013, 10:21 AM	#27
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	How the hell is it the government's business if I decide to carry my money in cash and not trust a bank.... And what is having x amount of cash proof of wrong doing??? It's insane that there are so many people OK with government seizures of cash these days . Last edited by sperbonzo; 07-24-2013 at 10:23 AM..

07-24-2013, 10:26 AM	#28
sandman! Icq: 14420613 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: chicago Posts: 15,432	good for her __________________ Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

07-24-2013, 11:59 AM	#30
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Great. Boiled down to facts we have one Indian transferring money from a cash business to another Indian about to buy another cash business. Glad my tax money goes to support an environment where so many from other countries can beat the system.

07-24-2013, 12:55 PM	#32
Creatine Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 1,060	Fuck that's a lot of money.

07-24-2013, 03:08 PM	#39
Jel Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 6,904	Hope she sues those cunts for distress, loss of potential earnings, and any other bs she can tack on.

07-24-2013, 03:27 PM	#41
Just Alex Liv Benson to You, Bitch Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Maryland and WV Posts: 6,060	Any pictures of this stripper? __________________

07-24-2013, 09:42 PM	#48
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	You aren't even talking about the same thing as I am. Law enforcment protocol has nothing to do with what you are talking about. Politicians don't make laws telling cops to pull you out of your car, search your car, frisk you like a criminal, etc. Politicians making laws VS The Supreme Court telling cops that it IS constitutional for them to search you, search your car, AND take your money if they "suspect" it "might" be "drug money" I'm not discussing the LAW. The draconian drug laws were already jacked up when Nixon declared "War On Drugs" The ONLY difference I'm talking about, as related to what happened to this woman and her money...is that the Supreme Court ruled it was constitutional for cops to do what they did. I really have ZERO idea of why you are continuing this. You're talking about laws put in place by bureaucrats. I'm talking about the constitutionality of cops being able to do what they did to that woman because the Supreme Court made those rulings a couple of decades ago. You aren't even having the same discussion as I am. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com