Wait, why isn't virginity porn a thing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skirtcake
    Registered User
    • Jul 2014
    • 95

    #1

    Wait, why isn't virginity porn a thing?

    I mean, aside from not being able to show blood. Which...one need not really do.

    Teen is such a huge category, I'm just surprised that the-taking-of fantasy isn't a bigger trend.

    Thoughts?
    * mormongirlz.com
    * twitter.com/mormon_girlz
    * mormon-girlz.tumblr.com
  • lezinterracial
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2012
    • 3117

    #2
    I remember years ago there was a site of girls losing their virginity. It was European girls, I believe. I don't know why it isn't a thing now.

    I remember there was a Video Series called "Virgin Stories". There was a disclaimer on the box "girls not actually virgins".

    Maybe Virgins are not believable.
    Live Sex Shows

    Comment

    • emmasexytime
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2015
      • 4514

      #3
      things go in phases so you have to keep up with what people want right now
      Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet!
      I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in.
      live camss > How to make a live cam site backlinks > hardlinks.org

      Comment

      • MasonSquelch
        Registered User
        • Jun 2014
        • 51

        #4
        Apart from being the saddest thing on earth (come on guys, a girl having sex for the very first time - in front of a camera?!), apart from finding a girl _over_ 18 that wants to lose her virginity in front of a camera, apart from all that has deflowering a girl way less pornographic potential than you might think.
        Mental Sinema - Wanktrance Outfitter

        Comment

        • Nigouki
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2015
          • 51

          #5
          Originally posted by MasonSquelch
          Apart from being the saddest thing on earth (come on guys, a girl having sex for the very first time - in front of a camera?!), apart from finding a girl _over_ 18 that wants to lose her virginity in front of a camera, apart from all that has deflowering a girl way less pornographic potential than you might think.
          Nah, it's all about how you film it. You do the sensual thing, 60fps cameras, high def none of this cheesy scripted bullshit. Make it something the user is viewing and not apart of. Think X-Art but with one of the actors practically being an amateur.

          Comment

          • MasonSquelch
            Registered User
            • Jun 2014
            • 51

            #6
            Originally posted by Nigouki
            Nah, it's all about how you film it. You do the sensual thing, 60fps cameras, high def none of this cheesy scripted bullshit. Make it something the user is viewing and not apart of. Think X-Art but with one of the actors practically being an amateur.
            Wouldn't mind if you would teach me better! :-) If you find a convincing scene then please tell me.
            Mental Sinema - Wanktrance Outfitter

            Comment

            • Focus
              Last of a dying breed.
              • Jun 2004
              • 669

              #7
              There no such thing as a "Virgin" in 2016

              Comment

              • SteelWings
                Registered User
                • May 2011
                • 6

                #8
                You'd never find actual virgins to shoot, and even if you did, I don't see how that could be anything but deeply unethical. However plenty of girls are new enough and decent enough to fake the role play, and I could see that doing well, so if you see and under-served niche, then fill it! No pun intended...
                LilyCade.com
                Porn Valley's Gold Star Lesbian

                Comment

                Working...