The term "Sexually Explicit Conduct" - Connects with Lingerie or Bikinis?

[truelux]

I am looking at the direct definition of the term "Sexually Explicit Conduct:"

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?

(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;

(ii) bestiality;

(iii) masturbation;

(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or

(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

From an adult-community perspective, can this term still be connected to Lingerie or Bikinis? Interested to see what other members have to say about this one!

[JimmyStephans]

Yes, it sure can. Google the term "Dost Factors"

Or find and read US vs. Dost 636 f.supp 828
US vs. Knox (2 cases: 776 f.supp 174 and 32 f.3d 733)

You can have a " lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person" without any nudity.

[truelux]

Nice, gotta hand it to the lawyers for being so descriptive about this crap. What if the "focus" is on the boobs? Then it sounds fine!