In the thread that got him banned didn't he admit that he was JohnnyClips as well?
They are one in the same, he finally dropped the harmless polite persona of 'wehateporn' and the JohnnyClips voice came out.
so fucking crazy, i exchanged emails months ago with 'wehateporn' - he told me that JohnnyClips and other trolls here including Franck were all in house with GFY and paid to stir things up to keep the rest of us amused/interested.
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
In the thread that got him banned didn't he admit that he was JohnnyClips as well?
They are one in the same, he finally dropped the harmless polite persona of 'wehateporn' and the JohnnyClips voice came out.
so fucking crazy, i exchanged emails months ago with 'wehateporn' - he told me that JohnnyClips and other trolls here including Franck were all in house with GFY and paid to stir things up to keep the rest of us amused/interested.
..and you believed that despite all the bullshit he slings?
----- Original Message -----
From: ***** *******
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 8:55 PM
Subject: Mutt, is that you? About JohnnyClips
Hey Mutt,
This is Pete the WeHatePorn guy, I just thought I better give you a headsup about JohnnyClips, I can't write this on GFY.
He's not a real person, he's one of the GFY bots, he's there to create drama. He's controlled by the same guy who was Agent488 and PornoJew. He's just there to stimulate the forum.
It's possible they will ban him for a bit, but it would actually be him banning himself for drama, as he is a mod.
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that, but on another note keep up the great work with your sites!
Take care
****
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
Those two nicks were clearly the same person. Very easy to spot them. All in good fun though. Sane trollers are OK with me. It's the lunatics who ruin the board.
----- Original Message -----
From: ***** *******
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 8:55 PM
Subject: Mutt, is that you? About JohnnyClips
Hey Mutt,
This is Pete the WeHatePorn guy, I just thought I better give you a headsup about JohnnyClips, I can't write this on GFY.
He's not a real person, he's one of the GFY bots, he's there to create drama. He's controlled by the same guy who was Agent488 and PornoJew. He's just there to stimulate the forum.
It's possible they will ban him for a bit, but it would actually be him banning himself for drama, as he is a mod.
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that, but on another note keep up the great work with your sites!
----- Original Message -----
From: ***** *******
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 8:55 PM
Subject: Mutt, is that you? About JohnnyClips
Hey Mutt,
This is Pete the WeHatePorn guy, I just thought I better give you a headsup about JohnnyClips, I can't write this on GFY.
He's not a real person, he's one of the GFY bots, he's there to create drama. He's controlled by the same guy who was Agent488 and PornoJew. He's just there to stimulate the forum.
It's possible they will ban him for a bit, but it would actually be him banning himself for drama, as he is a mod.
Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that, but on another note keep up the great work with your sites!
Take care
****
I wonder if he believes that or not.
Originally posted by helterskelter808
I seriously doubt wehateporn wrote that 'dead baby' thread, or the remark to baddog.
Whoever wrote it was going out of their way to get him banned.
Fill what in? To believe wehateporn posted that you have to believe that a guy who openly admitted he posted conspiracy stuff for thread/sig views, and who was never (to my knowledge) even remotely offensive, abusive or rude to anyone, suddenly decides to go out of his way to get himself banned by checking off multiple rules to break, posting the most extreme stuff. While simultaneously saying he'll be back. Because obviously it makes more sense to get banned and come back than simply not get banned.
OTOH, he wouldn't be the first insane poser I always gave the benefit of the doubt to because I thought he wasn't serious. Even for this week.
wehateporn is the man! Free the man and give him his access back so he can continue his great work of forcing gfy idiots to wise up and see the world as it should be seen.
Fill what in? To believe wehateporn posted that you have to believe that a guy who openly admitted he posted conspiracy stuff for thread/sig views, and who was never (to my knowledge) even remotely offensive, abusive or rude to anyone, suddenly decides to go out of his way to get himself banned by checking off multiple rules to break, posting the most extreme stuff. While simultaneously saying he'll be back. Because obviously it makes more sense to get banned and come back than simply not get banned.
OTOH, he wouldn't be the first insane poser I always gave the benefit of the doubt to because I thought he wasn't serious. Even for this week.
i've generally given him the benefit of the doubt too, in the early days even more so. but as i said earlier, i didn't even see the thread, that's why i'm curious about your comment. someone hacked his account, did the thread and the thread vanished pretty quick? maybe i'm upset with myself for missing the thread.
wehateporn is the man! Free the man and give him his access back so he can continue his great work of forcing gfy idiots to wise up and see the world as it should be seen.
3 cheers for wehateporn!
well, it is the end of the month, so he could be back day after tomorrow.
It was a thread entitled something like, "I hate Americans" or "Why I hate Americans" (which itself doesn't particularly sound like wehateporn). It was a picture of a dead baby with what I assume to be its skin partially burned off.
After several other people had replied, "wehateporn" himself replied to the thread, saying basically "ban me, I don't care, please ban me, I can come back anyway", and some reference to JohnnyClips that I didn't understand.
In another thread he referred to someone using KP.
As I said, basically checking off boxes of rules to break.
I expected the 'dead baby' thread to be deleted due to the image, and I assume that's the reason it was. Nothing sinister about that. But the posts were not anything I'd ever expect him to have written.
well, it is the end of the month, so he could be back day after tomorrow.
The time of the month is the only thing that makes me think well maybe it was him, if he considers he's going to be back in a few days anyway. Still very strange stuff for him to have posted though. If he's back in June, we'll see what he says about it.
Comment