Wikileaks about to spill the beans on BofA?
 

Bank of America may be the next target of a cache of Wikileaks documents.

Earlier this week, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said that he planned to release tens of thousands of documents on one of the largest banks in the U.S. The documents would reveal unethical behavior at the bank that would likely prompt official investigations and reforms, Assange said.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-o...&asset=&ccode=

Go You Good Thing !!! :)

That will put troops in harm way ........ :helpme

What does one have to do with the other?

I think it might have been a thing called irony :winkwink:

How does this guy get all this info?

Anonymous whistleblowers :thumbsup

damn, look at a way to give them info

It will be interesting to see what is in the hard drive belonging to the CEO of BofA.

People, so called "whistle blowers" steal it and send it to Wikileaks. They have several special systems setup to guard and guarantee your anonymity, often they do not even want to know your identity. They have a section on their page explaining how to send stuff to them and what to think of.

ueber leet hax0ring skillz

BofA stock down 3% today
http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/3...s-fall-on.html

Sweet.. big business has fucked the country, the world actually and continues to do it every day.. They all need to get strung up by their testicles.

Another article made a good point about this. Everyone knows the banks are insolvent and basically stole nearly a trillion dollars from tax payers while paying themselves the biggest salaries in history. Then after they got bailed out they went on a foreclosure spree full of fraud and "robo signers". Not to mention they never started loaning out money which is why we bailed them out in the first place.

What could possibly damage their image? Do they eat puppies at the board meetings? lol

Irony? Do tell.

All you do is ask retarded, quippy questions. You do that because its safe. You can feel like you're making a point, but you are doing it without the risk of actually making a point and opening yourself up to having your points picked apart and risking looking like an idiot.

Its easy to understand why so many people think you're a dipshit.

Is this better?



u-Bob: I have a feeling you do not know what irony means. There is nothing ironic about wikileaks providing info about BofA and also being a conduit for Manning unless you consider a newspaper ironic.

I know what irony means.

I also know that you reply to countless threads every day with a very short, condescending and often rhetorical question because you don't have the balls to actually debate an issue and take a position or articulate any kind of interesting or provocative or insightful thoughts on the issue.

And I wasn't talking to you, was I? I was restating my question to u-Bob, hoping to meet with your satisfaction.

No, I debate when there is a point in debating but with some people there is no point. Whether you appreciate is is of little importance, because as mentioned above, I probably wasn't talking to you then either.

Actually you senile turd, you questioned whether or not I know what irony means to which I responded.

Up your meds.

Your general pattern of behavior is to make short, condescending and rhetorical questions in almost every post you make because you have nothing of value to add to any conversation.

Thats not a choice, thats simply you understanding your own limits.

There, I fixed it so you could figure it out short of a picture being drawn.

Some get it, others don't ... you did ... :thumbsup

i hope wikileaks spills the beans on EVERYTHING. This planet needs a good global cluster fuck to clean things up a bit :)

As someone that has money in banks and investments, I am not sure we can handle the truth. :2 cents:

Everybody already knows the truth. The banks pulled a giant scam on everybody and nearly bankrupted the planet. How does proof change anything? When you can ask the government for nearly one trillion dollars with no strings attached and they cut the check within a few days, that means you pretty much operate above the law.

No amount of leaking can damage anybody at the top anymore.

I love how everyone in government is having an uproar about the truth being revealed. "This is a threat to national security", etc. WTF? The leak does not threaten anything, except to reveal that these people are fucking retarded. Why don't these people work on not doing stupid shit that threatens national security, and then the threat to national security won't have a chance of being revealed...

But no, these people want to continue doing the idiotic shit that got them in trouble in the first place, all while calling the "leak" a problem.

These people can't see past their noses...

Alrighty then.

Who does everybody bank with? I may be needing a new one soon. ;)

I have accounts with Wells Fargo, and a small credit union. I think I'd recommend a credit union over a bank. They tend to be less fee oriented.

Even funnier is when he is proven to be an idiot he quietly leaves the thread.

He needs to release it before he gets popped by Interpol. All banks are unethical. When you're the size of Bogart's just more skeletons to hide. The purchase of Countrywide could fill volumes full of bad loan debt files. Go get 'em wikileaks.

What are you rambling about?

Me too, I lvoe reading about all this shit.

Cash your checks now.

Following the latest baring of U.S. secrets on the Internet, Congress is poised to pass legislation giving employees in the most sensitive government jobs a way to report corruption, waste and mismanagement without turning to outside organizations like WikiLeaks.

Wikileaks has in the past released a lot of information about government cover ups, fraud, drug dealing,... and about US military activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,... A common reaction to wikileaks releasing information about military activities has been that it would somehow put US troops at risk. The fact that it may be the disclosed activities themselves and not the fact that they are being disclosed that provoke negative reactions doesn't seem to cross those people's minds. It also doesn't cross their mind that "it will harm the troops" is an easy way for those that ordered unethical actions to shift he attention away from their own responsibilities. It's called shooting the messenger.

Now if someone posted the often misused line "it will harm the troops" in response to a post that wikileaks will disclose information about unethical behavior in the banking world (something that's totally unrelated to the troops), one could consider that to be use of irony.

:2 cents:

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Sadly, you don't know what irony means if you think there is any in this thread.

Unless you mean irony in the alanis morrissette sense of the word? ie not at all.

Someone needs to leak some internal SKNANB / ePassporte documents to wikileaks so we can know exactly WTF happened there... :1orglaugh

the Chris Mallick and Gregory Elias files :thumbsup

:1orglaugh