ftvstream, does it convert or a waste of time?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • dazzling
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2002
    • 579
    #1

    ftvstream, does it convert or a waste of time?

    ftvstream, anyone tried it? What sort of ratios did you get? I like the website, just not sure if it will sell.
    DuckDuckGo Search Engine

    We Dont Track You
    Tags: None
    • Agent 488
      Registered User
      • Feb 2006
      • 22511
      #2
      converting like 2015 here.

        Comment

        • Nicky
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Mar 2003
          • 30071
          #3
          Originally posted by Agent 488
          converting like 2015 here.
          That's ~1:100k according to some on this board

          gfynicky @ gmail.com

            Comment

            • dazzling
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2002
              • 579
              #4
              Originally posted by Nicky
              That's ~1:100k according to some on this board
              That bad. Thanks, I had a feeling it would not convert.
              DuckDuckGo Search Engine

              We Dont Track You

                Comment

                • signupdamnit
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 6697
                  #5
                  Originally posted by Nicky
                  That's ~1:100k according to some on this board

                  I'm guessing closer to 1:5,684

                  http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=992899

                  You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.

                    Comment

                    • BIGTYMER
                      Junior Achiever
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 17066
                      #6
                      It converts just fine.

                        Comment

                        • dazzling
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 579
                          #7
                          Originally posted by BIGTYMER
                          It converts just fine.
                          Thanks Bigtymer, would you mind to give us your converting ratios?
                          DuckDuckGo Search Engine

                          We Dont Track You

                            Comment

                            • MrVids
                              i am a meat popsicle
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 1070
                              #8
                              we're doing pretty decent with it right now with 1:1986, considering a good majority of that is tube traffic, I can't complain.

                              I know they have the 180 day cookie on that which I'm really expecting the ratios to get better down the road as I build up more free users. Kind of a cool model for traffic I couldn't convert for paysites before.

                                Comment

                                • dazzling
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Nov 2002
                                  • 579
                                  #9
                                  Seems some are doing ok with it and others not. Im going to give it a go as I feel it might work with my website.
                                  DuckDuckGo Search Engine

                                  We Dont Track You

                                    Comment

                                    • garce
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Oct 2001
                                      • 7103
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by MrVids
                                      we're doing pretty decent with it right now with 1:1986, considering a good majority of that is tube traffic, I can't complain.


                                      The last time that 1:1986 was "pretty decent" was way back in 2013. Why not just promote FTV Girls and cut out the middle man. Zoiks!

                                        Comment

                                        • patmccrotch
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Oct 2002
                                          • 655
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by garce


                                          The last time that 1:1986 was "pretty decent" was way back in 2013. Why not just promote FTV Girls and cut out the middle man. Zoiks!
                                          1:1986 with tube traffic is way in the good category. I send a lot more to sponsor with my tubes vs my blogs. I don't get how promoting FTVGirls would be getting out the middle man...

                                          I dig the site, it's a new way to market to the surfer today that are used to the tube format. I think it's getting members whom I wouldn't have gotten with FTVGirls.

                                            Comment

                                            • dazzling
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Nov 2002
                                              • 579
                                              #12
                                              I also dont understand the "cutting out the middle man" quote. I thought both FTV Girls and FTV Stream are the same owner?
                                              DuckDuckGo Search Engine

                                              We Dont Track You

                                                Comment

                                                Previous template Next
                                                Working...