GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   12clicks and friends now take home 24% of total US income (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=996464)

stocktrader23 11-07-2010 03:14 PM

12clicks and friends now take home 24% of total US income
 
Nah, but they sure pretend like they do.

"The richest 1 percent of Americans now take home almost 24 percent of income, up from almost 9 percent in 1976."

"From 1980 to 2005, more than four-fifths of the total increase in American incomes went to the richest 1 percent."

"The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings."

"The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings."

You get the point.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/op...stof.html?_r=2

Robocrop 11-07-2010 03:20 PM

You spelled him wrong...its 12dicks.

12clicks 11-07-2010 04:17 PM

Work harder

dyna mo 11-07-2010 04:23 PM

what's the income bracket for that 1% group?

seeandsee 11-07-2010 04:23 PM

share some $$$ with friends

Slutboat 11-07-2010 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17680722)
Work harder

WORK HARDER hahaha - this is the Republicunt buzz term to the masses - Pass some laws to LET US GET RICHER without working for it, but you should WORK HARDER


hahahaha 12 Clicks is such a fucking moron!

stocktrader23 11-07-2010 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17680729)
what's the income bracket for that 1% group?

Way more than he makes. :1orglaugh

WarChild 11-07-2010 04:38 PM

12clicks is nowhere near that income bracket.

Zuzana Designs 11-07-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17680722)
Work harder

good advice rep for you :thumbsup

Sausage 11-07-2010 04:58 PM

Why do the rich owe you anything? They already pay most of your tax for you... so maybe its about time you stepped up and started paying your fair share ...

Ethersync 11-07-2010 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17680722)
Work harder

This plus stop bailing out the fucking banks and they will stop giving themselves huge bonuses.

xholly 11-07-2010 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs (Post 17680763)
good advice rep for you :thumbsup

No its not good advice. Hard work will simply get you a busted back and leave you poor when your old. I Doubt many on this forum actually work hard, they just look at porn all day and maybe make a few posts on forums.

Work smarter, work less, conceal your income and pay less tax while at the same time abuse those who do real hard work as stupid and lazy.

stocktrader23 11-07-2010 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17680848)
No its not good advice. Hard work will simply get you a busted back and leave you poor when your old. I Doubt many on this forum actually work hard, they just look at porn all day and maybe make a few posts on forums.

Work smarter, work less, conceal your income and pay less tax while at the same time abuse those who do real hard work as stupid and lazy.

Damn, you nailed em.

Agent 488 11-07-2010 06:02 PM

"richest 1 percent?" yeah right. maybe they make a herbal supplement to improve brain function.

12clicks 11-08-2010 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17680848)
No its not good advice. Hard work will simply get you a busted back and leave you poor when your old. I Doubt many on this forum actually work hard, they just look at porn all day and maybe make a few posts on forums.

Work smarter, work less, conceal your income and pay less tax while at the same time abuse those who do real hard work as stupid and lazy.

I've never called hardworking people stupid or lazy as I am one myself. I simply have no time for the mental midgetry that passes for the great unwashed intelligence. all being broadcast from mom's house. :thumbsup

xholly 11-08-2010 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681621)
I've never called hardworking people stupid or lazy as I am one myself. I simply have no time for the mental midgetry that passes for the great unwashed intelligence. all being broadcast from mom's house. :thumbsup

meh, neg repped. My dad worked hard all his life, now the poor guy can barely walk. Just saying id rather work smart than hard, make my money and use that money to enjoy my life.

12clicks 11-08-2010 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17681668)
meh, neg repped. My dad worked hard all his life, now the poor guy can barely walk. Just saying id rather work smart than hard, make my money and use that money to enjoy my life.

meh, you go right ahead sitting around on your ass waiting for your chance to work smart. it will come, I promise! :1orglaugh

james_clickmemedia 11-08-2010 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync (Post 17680793)
This plus stop bailing out the fucking banks and they will stop giving themselves huge bonuses.

the bank bailout was profitable for the country btw.

james_clickmemedia 11-08-2010 06:53 AM

Flat 25-27% tax for all is what I want to see.
will never happen though.

xholly 11-08-2010 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681669)
meh, you go right ahead sitting around on your ass waiting for your chance to work smart. it will come, I promise! :1orglaugh

Thanks for believing in me :thumbsup

12clicks 11-08-2010 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17681676)
Thanks for believing in me :thumbsup

believing in you?
honey, I already know where you'll end up.

12clicks 11-08-2010 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james_clickmemedia (Post 17681675)
Flat 25-27% tax for all is what I want to see.
will never happen though.

why in the world would you want the government to take that much?
a flat 15% is all they'd need.

dyna mo 11-08-2010 07:00 AM

arguing about whether or not hard work pays off? and justifying not working hard due to someone being barely able to walk.

jeez.

Grapesoda 11-08-2010 07:47 AM

note to self: get into top 1% asap

Paul Markham 11-08-2010 07:56 AM

I doubt if many in porn are in the top 1% and in Internet porn I doubt if many are in the top 10%.

There's just not and never been that kind of money in porn and spread way to much.

Those I knew who were in the top earners in porn invested the money from porn in other ventures.

Grapesoda 11-08-2010 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17681773)
I doubt if many in porn are in the top 1% and in Internet porn I doubt if many are in the top 10%.

There's just not and never been that kind of money in porn and spread way to much.

Those I knew who were in the top earners in porn invested the money from porn in other ventures.

yes but we are in the top 1% on a world wide income level. if steven spielburg or jerry brukhimer only had porn money they would be very very stressed indeed

cykoe6 11-08-2010 08:04 AM

I am not too concerned with how much someone else makes or pays in taxes. Good for them. I support lower taxes for all people because I believe most of the current activities of the federal government are illegitimate and unconstitutional......... and therefore I believe the best remedy is to limit its revenue as much as possible.

Starve the beast. :2 cents:

12clicks 11-08-2010 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17681773)
I doubt if many in porn are in the top 1% and in Internet porn I doubt if many are in the top 10%.

There's just not and never been that kind of money in porn and spread way to much.

Those I knew who were in the top earners in porn invested the money from porn in other ventures.

its funny watching guys give away info on themselves thru their outlook on the world.

top 1% = $350k and up

top 10% = $113k


plenty of guys in our business in both those groups.

12clicks 11-08-2010 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 17681790)
I am not too concerned with how much someone else makes or pays in taxes. Good for them. I support lower taxes for all people

well said. and I agree.

quiet 11-08-2010 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681795)
its funny watching guys give away info on themselves thru their outlook on the world.

top 1% = $350k and up

top 10% = $113k


plenty of guys in our business in both those groups.

no fucking shit lol.

stocktrader23 11-08-2010 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681795)
its funny watching guys give away info on themselves thru their outlook on the world.

top 1% = $350k and up

top 10% = $113k


plenty of guys in our business in both those groups.

I was playing with you sir. I think the top 1% is closer to $400k per year but either way, there are a lot of webmasters in that bracket for sure.

12clicks 11-08-2010 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 17681956)
I was playing with you sir.

more imaginary triumphs of a chat board hero?

Paul Markham 11-08-2010 09:07 AM

I stand corrected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Househo..._United_States

Here is the earnings over the last few years. http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pa...ome-taxes.html

I would of put the top 1% over the million a year mark. So lots of people in the top 10% including me up till a few years ago. :thumbsup

Barefootsies 11-08-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681795)
top 1% = $350k and up

top 10% = $113k

plenty of guys in our business in both those groups.

True dat fine sire.
:pimp

Although, I would place a wager 50% of the visible adult online industry is under $36,000 and 85% under $50,000.00 annually.

woj 11-08-2010 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17682005)
True dat fine sire.
:pimp

Although, I would place a wager 50% of the visible adult online industry is under $36,000 and 85% under $50,000.00 annually.

That's about the same % that are part-timers in this biz... if you include only those that do this fulltime for a living there are plenty of people that pull in 6 figures a year... :2 cents:

woj 11-08-2010 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17681994)
I stand corrected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Househo..._United_States

Here is the earnings over the last few years. http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pa...ome-taxes.html

I would of put the top 1% over the million a year mark. So lots of people in the top 10% including me up till a few years ago. :thumbsup

I'm not sure if we are discussing "household income" here, are we? Household = you, your wife, and your cousin that happens to live with you...
so household income of $100k/year = $33k per person, which is fuck all... :2 cents:

datatank 11-08-2010 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 17680639)
Nah, but they sure pretend like they do.

"The richest 1 percent of Americans now take home almost 24 percent of income, up from almost 9 percent in 1976."

"From 1980 to 2005, more than four-fifths of the total increase in American incomes went to the richest 1 percent."

"The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings."

"The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings."

You get the point.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/op...stof.html?_r=2



Top 1% ? $277,983 this is from 07 but sure its not that far off today

datatank 11-08-2010 09:55 AM

Top 0.1% — $1,134,849

stocktrader23 11-08-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datatank (Post 17682151)
Top 1% ? $277,983 this is from 07 but sure its not that far off today

I read a figure that said $377,xxx that was from 2005. Haven't seen two matching sources yet, either way it's no money but a fuckload more than most will ever have.

Barefootsies 11-08-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17682074)
if you include only those that do this fulltime for a living there are plenty of people that pull in 6 figures a year...

True dat. Hitting $100,000.00 is not that hard to do.
:2 cents:

james_clickmemedia 11-08-2010 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17681689)
why in the world would you want the government to take that much?
a flat 15% is all they'd need.

i'm including about 5% to cover health care.

I would pay way less in taxes and no insurance premiums...

TheDoc 11-08-2010 11:25 AM

It's probably only 1% of the people in our Industry that could pay themselves 'personally' $300k+ a year.

Most people in this Industry suck the Company dry every chance they get just to make that type of money. To safely draw an income like that, you need a Company earning $3 million or more a year - depending on expenses, with a million liquid cash in the Corp bank and a personal net worth for the owner.

Otherwise, you're just being a poser and putting your Company in danger. So realistically, less than 1% in this Industry safely pays themselves that much year after year.

12clicks 11-08-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17682530)
It's probably only 1% of the people in our Industry that could pay themselves 'personally' $300k+ a year.

Most people in this Industry suck the Company dry every chance they get just to make that type of money. To safely draw an income like that, you need a Company earning $3 million or more a year - depending on expenses, with a million liquid cash in the Corp bank and a personal net worth for the owner.

Otherwise, you're just being a poser and putting your Company in danger. So realistically, less than 1% in this Industry safely pays themselves that much year after year.

only because the industry is bloated with part timers, fly by night programs, and pretenders.

12clicks 11-08-2010 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james_clickmemedia (Post 17682414)
i'm including about 5% to cover health care.

I would pay way less in taxes and no insurance premiums...

I'd rather pay way less in taxes and continue to buy the best healthcare in the world.
I'd rather give 5% of my wealth to a doctor than to the government.

Vendzilla 11-08-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17680848)
No its not good advice. Hard work will simply get you a busted back and leave you poor when your old. I Doubt many on this forum actually work hard, they just look at porn all day and maybe make a few posts on forums.

Work smarter, work less, conceal your income and pay less tax while at the same time abuse those who do real hard work as stupid and lazy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 17680850)
Damn, you nailed em.

Actually, there are people in this country that work hard, save their money. Then come to find that with the current administration lowering interest rates to help those that fucked up and the people they hurt, is hurting them by lowering their income from the interest they saved.

TheDoc 11-08-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17682549)
only because the industry is bloated with part timers, fly by night programs, and pretenders.

True... and a bunch of Company owners that think a few million a year or 10 or even 100 million a year is anything but chump change in the real business world. Banks feel the same way, easily less than .1% qualify for an actual big business account at any major Bank in our Industry. So in the end, we're all - even the top player - is small fish swimming in some rich persons money they shit out that morning for breakfast.

woj 11-08-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17682530)
It's probably only 1% of the people in our Industry that could pay themselves 'personally' $300k+ a year.

Most people in this Industry suck the Company dry every chance they get just to make that type of money. To safely draw an income like that, you need a Company earning $3 million or more a year - depending on expenses, with a million liquid cash in the Corp bank and a personal net worth for the owner.

Otherwise, you're just being a poser and putting your Company in danger. So realistically, less than 1% in this Industry safely pays themselves that much year after year.

What's the advantage of keeping $$ in the corporation? If the corporation would ever need the funds, the owner can always just lend it back to the corporation at any time...

12clicks 11-08-2010 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17682587)
True... and a bunch of Company owners that think a few million a year or 10 or even 100 million a year is anything but chump change in the real business world. Banks feel the same way, easily less than .1% qualify for an actual big business account at any major Bank in our Industry. So in the end, we're all - even the top player - is small fish swimming in some rich persons money they shit out that morning for breakfast.

true, which makes comments from the peanut gallery even more laughable.

TheDoc 11-08-2010 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17682593)
What's the advantage of keeping $$ in the corporation? If the corporation would ever need the funds, the owner can always just lend it back to the corporation at any time...

It's not about leaving the money in the Corp... That's more about building it up to a safety point. Bad luck, down eco, major lawsuits, the general unknown but expected business stuff.

Fund wise... If you take the money, it's taxed. if you give it to the Corp, it has a debt to you or you lose the money. One way or another, it's a loss. In the reverse, you could have invested the money, delayed the tax, possibly increased the pool of money, and pulled it when needed. Or if you're doing it to grow business, you could have done a loan to share holder or to the new corp, giving it a debt to start with - passing some tax relief down the chain - without costing you personally.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123