![]() |
12clicks and friends now take home 24% of total US income
Nah, but they sure pretend like they do.
"The richest 1 percent of Americans now take home almost 24 percent of income, up from almost 9 percent in 1976." "From 1980 to 2005, more than four-fifths of the total increase in American incomes went to the richest 1 percent." "The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings." "The richest 0.1 percent of taxpayers would get a tax cut of $61,000 from President Obama. They would get $370,000 from Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. And that provides only a modest economic stimulus, because the rich are less likely to spend their tax savings." You get the point. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/op...stof.html?_r=2 |
You spelled him wrong...its 12dicks.
|
Work harder
|
what's the income bracket for that 1% group?
|
share some $$$ with friends
|
Quote:
hahahaha 12 Clicks is such a fucking moron! |
Quote:
|
12clicks is nowhere near that income bracket.
|
Quote:
|
Why do the rich owe you anything? They already pay most of your tax for you... so maybe its about time you stepped up and started paying your fair share ...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Work smarter, work less, conceal your income and pay less tax while at the same time abuse those who do real hard work as stupid and lazy. |
Quote:
|
"richest 1 percent?" yeah right. maybe they make a herbal supplement to improve brain function.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Flat 25-27% tax for all is what I want to see.
will never happen though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
honey, I already know where you'll end up. |
Quote:
a flat 15% is all they'd need. |
arguing about whether or not hard work pays off? and justifying not working hard due to someone being barely able to walk.
jeez. |
note to self: get into top 1% asap
|
I doubt if many in porn are in the top 1% and in Internet porn I doubt if many are in the top 10%.
There's just not and never been that kind of money in porn and spread way to much. Those I knew who were in the top earners in porn invested the money from porn in other ventures. |
Quote:
|
I am not too concerned with how much someone else makes or pays in taxes. Good for them. I support lower taxes for all people because I believe most of the current activities of the federal government are illegitimate and unconstitutional......... and therefore I believe the best remedy is to limit its revenue as much as possible.
Starve the beast. :2 cents: |
Quote:
top 1% = $350k and up top 10% = $113k plenty of guys in our business in both those groups. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I stand corrected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Househo..._United_States Here is the earnings over the last few years. http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pa...ome-taxes.html I would of put the top 1% over the million a year mark. So lots of people in the top 10% including me up till a few years ago. :thumbsup |
Quote:
:pimp Although, I would place a wager 50% of the visible adult online industry is under $36,000 and 85% under $50,000.00 annually. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
so household income of $100k/year = $33k per person, which is fuck all... :2 cents: |
Quote:
Top 1% ? $277,983 this is from 07 but sure its not that far off today |
Top 0.1% — $1,134,849
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Quote:
I would pay way less in taxes and no insurance premiums... |
It's probably only 1% of the people in our Industry that could pay themselves 'personally' $300k+ a year.
Most people in this Industry suck the Company dry every chance they get just to make that type of money. To safely draw an income like that, you need a Company earning $3 million or more a year - depending on expenses, with a million liquid cash in the Corp bank and a personal net worth for the owner. Otherwise, you're just being a poser and putting your Company in danger. So realistically, less than 1% in this Industry safely pays themselves that much year after year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd rather give 5% of my wealth to a doctor than to the government. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fund wise... If you take the money, it's taxed. if you give it to the Corp, it has a debt to you or you lose the money. One way or another, it's a loss. In the reverse, you could have invested the money, delayed the tax, possibly increased the pool of money, and pulled it when needed. Or if you're doing it to grow business, you could have done a loan to share holder or to the new corp, giving it a debt to start with - passing some tax relief down the chain - without costing you personally. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123