Crazy how much she spent... Can't imagine pissing that much cash down my leg to be a fucking governor. Personally I'd spend the money on booze, hookers and gambling...much more fun!
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
Maybe I'm missing something, but it went under her control when it had only 30 employees and was doing $4.7 million a year. Are they worse off?
Not that I give a shit...I don't think she would have been a GREAT governor, but doubt she'd be worse than Jerry Brown.
Yes it did but by none of her own doing. The story is a long one but if you want to read it then here is a good summary. I looked for a less partisan source but the Google is currently filled with election crap.
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
She probably would have one if her campaign cost 1 Million and donated the rest to the state since it is in need of the money. That would have been a good campaign.
Brown has already proven he is incompetent as a governor. You just don't pay attention.
Or he has a very bad memory... Brown fucked up the state his last time in office. Round 2 should be the nail in the coffin.
Im glad I left Cali long ago.
I just feel spending $160 million leads to corruption. Which ever party spends it. The system is so open to corruption and it's good the voters spoke on this one.
I'm racking my brain trying to figure out a scenario where it would be worth spending $160 million just to sit in the governor's chair. The only thing I can think of is if your kid brother is on death row.
I'm racking my brain trying to figure out a scenario where it would be worth spending $160 million just to sit in the governor's chair. The only thing I can think of is if your kid brother is on death row.
I'm certain she intended to use the governorship as a stepping stone to the White House and the fact that she lost does not necessarily take her off that path.
I really wonder how it came about that she made that gaff about California being so great 30 yrs ago. Did someone write that? Did she ad lib it? wtf was she thinking, lol.
I'm certain she intended to use the governorship as a stepping stone to the White House and the fact that she lost does not necessarily take her off that path.
Well someone removed the stepping stone and she just fell SPLAT on her face in the creek.. Sorry Crazy Sally
The Slut Boat soon will be making another run
The Slut Boat promises something for everyone
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
goes to show you can't always buy your way into power. there should really be a cap of what can be spent all around. its such a horrible waste of money.
lets go even further, people who are so rich shouldn't be allowed to even run for political positions. why? because people with kind of wealth have little connection to reality and what life is like for the average voter.
I'm racking my brain trying to figure out a scenario where it would be worth spending $160 million just to sit in the governor's chair. The only thing I can think of is if your kid brother is on death row.
Got to be a big profit in there somewhere. I'm sure you could buy a pardon from the right person for much less than that.
I just feel spending $160 million leads to corruption. Which ever party spends it. The system is so open to corruption and it's good the voters spoke on this one.
It would actually be the opposite. What leads to corruption is when lobbyists donate to a campaign and then the candidate is beholden to their special interests once in office. If she spent her own money, she's less likely to take outside money and doesnt have to answer to anyone.
I'm a dem mainly due to social issues but tend to side with the Republicans on fiscal policy. I just find that the Rep party has been taken over by right wing nuts. So I guess I could be called a moderate Democrat.
That being said what California needs is a bitch (not that Meg Whittman is one, just using the OP's term). Someone who will come in and make the hard choices and tell it how it is. They dont need a handout liberal who wants everyone to feel all warm and fuzzy inside. They have real problems and they needed someone who wasnt afraid to ruffle a few feathers along the way.
what if you allready had and did everything you wanted to do in life ?
Originally posted by CDSmith
I'm racking my brain trying to figure out a scenario where it would be worth spending $160 million just to sit in the governor's chair. The only thing I can think of is if your kid brother is on death row.
Comment