![]() |
Adult Conversion Ratios, 2000 - 2020
- Assuming +25% per year (which seems about right)
- General Adult Traffic (Niched traffic will be about 50% - 80% of these ratios) - Raw clicks to sponsors 2000- 1:200 2001- 1:250 2002- 1:313 2003- 1:391 2004- 1:488 2005- 1:610 2006- 1:763 2007- 1:954 2008- 1:1,192 2009- 1:1,490 2010- 1:1,863 2011- 1:2,328 2012- 1:2,910 2013- 1:3,638 2014- 1:4,547 2015- 1:5,684 2016- 1:7,105 2017- 1:8,882 2018- 1:11,102 2019- 1:13,878 2020- 1:17,347 Doesn't look like it's that much off based on past data and seems realistic for future data. Thoughts? |
And where are these statistics coming from? I'm getting mostly 1:400-1:650 nowadays.
|
Quote:
You are doing very well. What were your ratios in 2000? |
dude, you made those statistics up...
how do you figure 25? why not 35% or 50%? |
lol there will be no affilates by 2020. none.
|
Using the previous ratio figures, here is the total traffic you would need to send to sponsors to make the same amount of money.
(1,000 raws / day is the baseline in 2000.) 2000- 1,000 2001- 1,250 2002- 1,562 2003- 1,953 2004- 2,441 2005- 3,052 2006- 3,814 2007- 4,768 2008- 5,960 2009- 7,450 2010- 9,313 2011- 11,642 2012- 14,552 2013- 18,190 2014- 22,737 2015- 28,422 2016- 35,527 2017- 44,409 2018- 55,511 2019- 69,389 2020- 86,736 Today you need 931% more traffic than you did in 2000. In 2015 you will need 2,842% (this is correct there is no error) more traffic to make the same as you did in 2000 from the pay site model. edited it to simplify it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It appears even if one group were to take over the entire online adult market completely in 2020 they will still not make near as much that year as they could have made in 2000 with only 33% of the market. Amazing. |
and thats why we stick with SE traffic for the majority
|
people live in the adult bubble too much. affiliate and internet marketing is alive and well outside of it ...
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
please do you have some stats from 2810?
|
Quote:
Also your ratio is in function of your sponsor. New stuff= better old stuff = worse |
No sense to asume that ratios will grow by the same speed as till now, first because we had the huge influx of free porn which increased the ratios. I don't think we will see such free porn influx in the future, because its already 100% freely available.
|
Raw's do not mean much to me. Let's see what you get applying the same formula with uniques.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
right now 1:7000 is normal :(:disgust:Oh crap
|
Quote:
but it's like 1/800 in 2008 (raw), 1/1000 in 2009, 1/1200 in 2010 for the same sponsor. With a new one, it would be 1/850-900 now, and because of the crisis not because it is possible to find the content for free. Also even if you can find the content for free, what would you bother searching this content during hours if you have enough money to get it now. For me your conversion ratio in 2000 is probably exagerated. 1/500 for a sponsor that converts now at 1/1500 ? The one who answered that the content is still available for free and that it shouldn't affects our conversion ratios is probably right. |
Quote:
Or 95%. People hardly buy vinyl records these days, and they were 100% of the market at one point not so long ago. Technology is going to accelerate the rate of change. I feel the old fashioned .htaccess style pay site has maybe a couple of years at most. In fact I would say the way people use the web with IE, Firefox etc. is on the way out now. |
Quote:
|
When more people start to leave this business the ratio will go up. Less competition.
|
Quote:
For reference see this thread from late 2004: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=397135 The numbers aren't too far off. Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd back those numbers up, they're obviously estimates but give or take a few hundred, this is pretty close to what I've experienced with targeted traffic over the last 10 years as well as what i've seen from the affiliate ratios i've looked at. I'd add a couple years: 1998: 1 in 30 1999: 1 in 60 I remember getting a dozen signups a day just off the hun It's hard to predict the future but I'm thinking the scale might slow down a bit after 2017, there will always be some opportunities to convert people, your scale seems to fly off the charts after 2017 |
Quote:
The funny part is that because affiliates are so hung up on the fat PPS payouts the programs we have now are too scared to offer anything that would convert better but leave less to share. This is one of the main reasons that all but a few programs will phase out affiliates all together. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This isn't intended to be affiliate versus sponsor versus tube site. The change in conversions should affect everyone in the industry. More than likely similar trends will emerge for dating and cams as free alternatives and other factors emerge. Quote:
The numbers go crazy as they increase because it compounds. 25% of 15,000 versus 25% of 200, etc. I hope shit doesn't get this bad either. If it does I can't see most people staying past 2012 when things start to almost double again from where they are. Most of the industry can't handle that. No way. |
Quote:
I'm pretty sad about this industry as a whole. There are self destructive companies all over online but I've never seen it with the same intensity as I do in adult. The constant shooting of ones self in the dick is pathetically sad but also hilarious. |
Quote:
Trust me, your stats ain't reflecting what's happening right now. It's going down wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy too fast now. |
By the way, mobile is the market that is in the process of booming. Promoted right it wouldn't be ridiculous to see conversions of 1:10 again. It just aint going to work on a 1997 style paysite with a $30 per month price tag.
|
Quote:
My CCBill ratios for the last few years (rounded to nearest 100) : 2010: ~ 1:1,600 (to october 1, 2010) 2009: ~ 1:1,800 2008: ~ 1:1,300 2007: ~ 1:1,300 I'd say overall my NATS/MPA3/custom programs are doing worse than CCBill. Verotel is slightly better than CCBill but I am doing more targeted niches which skew things. I couldn't provide good data for these without a lot of digging due to various glitches in the way stats are done. For comparison one program I use posts their total stats monthly. They are at 1:3,300 and I don't question his honesty although I'm not sure if he is counting FHG raw hits (which I suspect). I won't name the program so as to not embarrass them. If anyone (preferably affiliates with no conflict of interest) else wants to post their (honest) ratios for past years that would great. Perhaps it would help to get a handle on where things are going. |
Don't worry we're all going to die in 2012.
|
depends on the sponsor
|
Quote:
|
Bump.
So almost one year later does it seem to be following the trend overall? I think it is. If not worse. What do you all say? This model would suggest an average affiliate ratio somewhere around 1:2,500 raw at the moment. |
wonder what the ccbill ratios are like on uploaded.to.
In this thread ill listen to Quiet RIP |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The conversion ratio decreases as in the 2010 table but we have to remind that in 2000 there was no indian, egypt, chinese, turkish, brazil, russian traffic as today, instead 99% of clicks it was from HQ countries = north america + australia + west europe. Let's say today only 33% of traffic is from those HQ countries, this reduce of 1/3 the ratio automatically. It should be made a ratio calculation on same countries base clicks, for example filter US traffic only and say, from US traffic it was 1:X on 2000, 1:Y on 2010, and is 1:Z on 2012, I bet this make it look 2 to 3 times less the drop in ratio (to be even more precise, I can tell 20%+ of US traffic is proxies from iran or other countries whose ISPs censor adult, so I talk of real US traffic this is even less then geotarget reports).
Further, in 2000 there was not as many under 18 people online.. if you look at alexa or compete.com age stats on pornhub, it says 20% to 30% is under 18's (that's faults of their parents, not accusing sites of this), and these do not pay now as was not paying in 2000 if had internet. So if you re-make the table considering only real US traffic of people who is over 18, I bet this make it look 3 to 5 times less the drop in ratio. Last obvious thing to consider is the worldwide crisis after 2008, where most businesses reduced sales/ratio, so you find same drop out of adult and out of online biz, simply is everywhere and can't avoid it, what's recession % you can find on google or wikipedia. Still there is a drop in ratio even after the above corrections, this includes the easy availability of unlimited quick warn content from tubes and collector hd content from torrent sites, both of which unstoppable as technically and legally doable in some countries at any time by any people. It is even available free naked cam shows via myfreecams and its cloning trend sites. What to do? Find how to get paid for traffic no matter anyone pays. I see advertising in big sites is sold prepaid per spot in bids, no more rev share really. Also programs paying for free user signups, leads, email verify. That should not drop ratio being free, issue is just program may not be able to pay much or forever this free way, see chaturbate switching $1 per lead to revshare on 10 April. Also the cheaters in free signups are more then stolen card chargebacks in pay mode. We tried pay per free new program since a month at tubecamgirl.com and nearly half the affiliares are cheaters! Exotic countries kids will solve captcha with differet proxy per user, plus stay online hours to earn the minutes usage bonus we give, so it take quite some extra time to find and manage those cheaters every day, and time is money too. |
Quote:
|
So glad my ratios don't look like that...
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123