IBill or Epassporte. Which one is going to be bigger?
 

Looks like Mallick cut off everyone from accessing their transaction history and even the cc number that we will need to access account with St Kitts bank.
This is flat out fraud. :Oh crap

damn it hurts. sig spot

iBill stole more momey IMHO.

ibill, iagree :2 cents:

I'd say iBill was much bigger due to all the rebills lost.

Ibill got away with more.

That's a toughy. Hard to say which one caused more damage because both were privately owned companies. Hence, their financials remain undisclosed.

ibill , rebills etc..

ibill was probably more money because of missed rebills

but epass caused problems for many more

iBill... countless people lost millions a year & they paid most affiliates - like ccbill does today. It was an all around hit just like epass was but iBill was much bigger.

ibill was far bigger, even if another dime never comes out of epass. but damage, in some ways epass was more damaging to a lot of small and mid-level people.

Easily answered - do a fast thread count of the word "I-Bill" vs. "E-Pass". You'll easily find that IBill will go down in history more for screwing webmasters out of more money along with their arrogance in post responses - EPass at least had the decency to asked us to step away from the ropes and ladders before pulling anchor and sailing off into the sunset.

iBill was worse. :2 cents:

ePass hit gambling harder ... and iBill adult.

I think IBill hit adults wallets the hardest with rebills and ext... but epass effected more people overall.

ibill were worse

At this point, anyone that hadn't copied all that information down was just stupid... Several people made posts that everyone should download all that info weeks ago.. I myself fell into the stupid category at the start as well... But the day the bank cut off epass from reading the visa information, I downloaded every damn listing page of my transactions etc.

iBill was the gift that kept on giving in adult. To add insult to injury they kept coming back again and again.