GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   regarding Bieyanka Moore ... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=986119)

facialfreak 09-08-2010 05:08 PM

regarding Bieyanka Moore ...
 
I think that we need to know what the 411 is on this allegation ...

Reality Kings had her sign a release ...

Does the ID she presented when signing the release say "CHARRIDA (or RITA) SMALLEY", or is it another name?

Because CHARRIDA SMALLEY is indeed 15 years old, according to the missing persons report.

People are saying they are NOT the same girl ... they don't look like the same girl ... and what have you ... but the only question I would like addressed, is if in fact, the name on her legal ID that she presented when signing the release is CHARRIDA SMALLEY?

If the name matches, that's proof enough for me to remove all content, but if the ID she presented called her Denise Smith or Janice Edwards, then I am going to wait and see what unfolds and not jump the gun ...

Could somebody from Reality Kings please enlighten us as to this one detail?

Thank You

Socks 09-08-2010 05:13 PM

I'd just wait to see what RK does and then mimic their actions. If they pull her content, I would too. If they leave it up, I'd do the same.

Now if this was Joe Blow's program that started 6 months ago, I'd be yanking that shit at lightning speed. But we all know RK is well represented legally.

cambaby 09-08-2010 05:17 PM

You better remove all content now, I have no idea why you are even THINKING about it. All it takes some hungry news reporter or politician to get a hold of your website and wreak havoc.

OneHungLo 09-08-2010 05:32 PM

Her background image on her twitter page is named char.jpg as in Charrida ?

http://a3.twimg.com/profile_backgrou...84055/char.jpg

Tyler Chanel Evans was used on the fake ID and if you look at the Google cache of her facebook page she changed her name from Rita Smalley ( Charrida Smalley ) to Chanel Evans.

Remove it. Better to be safe than sorry. :2 cents:

candyflip 09-08-2010 06:43 PM

You can't look at the photos provided and say it's not the same girl.

It's her, right down to the tattoos.

chronig 09-08-2010 06:47 PM

:eek2




:error

cambaby 09-08-2010 08:45 PM

So Reality Kings made a porn of a 15 year old girl? wow... dangerous times :(

facialfreak 09-09-2010 02:26 AM

why is everybody except Reality Kings answering in this thread? LOL

I am pretty sure it is her too, yet I have people I trust in the industry telling me to get confirmation from RK first ... or to wait and see how they handle it ..

Could we get an official statement of some sort Reality Kings? :Oh crap

Roald 09-09-2010 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by facialfreak (Post 17483104)
why is everybody except Reality Kings answering in this thread? LOL

I am pretty sure it is her too, yet I have people I trust in the industry telling me to get confirmation from RK first ... or to wait and see how they handle it ..

Could we get an official statement of some sort Reality Kings? :Oh crap

becuase RK is on it and its probably not in their best interest to reply at this point!?!

erooup 09-09-2010 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 17483112)
becuase RK is on it and its probably not in their best interest to reply at this point!?!

Exactly. They need to be 100% sure.

DWB 09-09-2010 02:40 AM

It's not rocket science. RK already did the responsible thing and removed it. What else do you need to know?

Paul Markham 09-09-2010 02:41 AM

I am not a lawyer, just someone who has been around for long enough to know caution is best. So I advise everyone to err on the side of caution and pull the content. If it's resolved in the favor of RK not shooting an under age girl then you can put it back up.

If they did shoot or have content of an underage girl, keeping the content up is dicing with trouble.

And if they did shoot an underage girl expect the Feds to have a long list of people associated with the sponsor.

TheDA 09-09-2010 04:39 AM

The first thread on this was locked. What was in the first thread that that caused that to happen, links, pics, evidence?

MontrealPimp 09-10-2010 07:35 PM

The custodian of records for her porn shoot is located just steps from where the 15 year old run away was found in Miami just recently.

OneHungLo 09-10-2010 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17483123)
I am not a lawyer, just someone who has been around for long enough to know caution is best. So I advise everyone to err on the side of caution and pull the content. If it's resolved in the favor of RK not shooting an under age girl then you can put it back up.

If they did shoot or have content of an underage girl, keeping the content up is dicing with trouble.

And if they did shoot an underage girl expect the Feds to have a long list of people associated with the sponsor.

I'm not a lawyer but i bet most lawyers would tell you to not just yank down the content.

I'm sure that in itself could be a charge of obstruction of justice? No?

Also could Scienter "guilty knowledge" be a defense here if they were charged ( considering the girl gave them a legit ID and another form as backup?)

mchacal 09-17-2010 07:21 PM

I hope this chick it's going to be all right


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123