GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Barack Obama Is The Worst President In History (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=982099)

Porn Mickey 08-12-2010 01:20 AM

Barack Obama Is The Worst President In History
 
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/im...quayle.cnn.jpg

(CNN) - Ben Quayle, the son of former Vice President Dan Quayle who is seeking a House seat in Arizona, is making a splash with a new campaign ad in which he looks straight into the camera and declares, "Barack Obama is the worst president in history."

"My generation will inherit a weakened country," Quayle also says solemnly in the new 30-second spot. "Drug cartels in Mexico, tax cartels in DC. What's happened to America? I love Arizona. I was raised right. Someone needs to go to Washington and knock the hell out of the place."

Quayle, the 33-year-old son of the former vice president, is one of 10 Republicans seeking the GOP nomination for the third district House seat of retiring Rep. John Shadegg. The Republican-leaning district primarily encompasses Phoenix and its surrounding suburbs.


Quayle recently ran into controversy after admitting to having posted on the controversial website DirtyScottsdale.com four years ago. The racy website features scantily clad women and focuses on profiling the Scottsdale nightclub scene. Quayle told a local TV station Tuesday he posted on the website on behalf of a friend to "drive some traffic."

GatorB 08-12-2010 01:23 AM

Ben Quayle, the son of former Vice President Dan Quayle

/thread

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 08-12-2010 01:36 AM

Ben Quayle is a bigger douchebag than his Daddy...and that is saying a lot.

http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/...nd-Son-Ben.jpg

DirtyScottsdale.com, enough said. :disgust

ADG

Black Ops 08-12-2010 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Webmasters (Post 17409157)
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/im...quayle.cnn.jpg

"Someone needs to go to Washington and knock the hell out of the place."

That's probably enough of a statement to have him locked up forever in Gitmo. :2 cents:

icymelon 08-12-2010 02:17 AM

hope the apple falls far from the tree but some how based on his campaign I suspect its not far

IllTestYourGirls 08-12-2010 04:13 AM

I would like to hear a good argument that he is not. If Bush was the worst president in history and Obama has expanded his policies, how is Obama not the worst?

cambaby 08-12-2010 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409311)
I would like to hear a good argument that he is not. If Bush was the worst president in history and Obama has expanded his policies, how is Obama not the worst?

Dude hes black he cant be the worst, its just not allowed.

ottopottomouse 08-12-2010 04:16 AM

Whoever is currently in power is ALWAYS the worst in history. Then they get replaced by someone else who becomes the worst in history and everybody looks back fondly at the previous one and say's he wasn't that bad really.

seeandsee 08-12-2010 04:24 AM

every president is worst of all time :)

Paul Markham 08-12-2010 04:27 AM

Anyone in power of a Western Nation is facing a lot of problems. For decades the West has grown fat and lazy. Exported jobs, imported crap and believed retail and banking would support a life style they were not earning.

With the collapse of the banks the shit hit the fan.

If you think the emerging nations, the places we keep buying from, are going to trust the Wests banks again you take a risk with your future and your childrens futures. And if the banks move to the emerging nation because they offer a better deal, then times will get worse.

Only time will tell if Obama is the worse ever.

John-ACWM 08-12-2010 04:28 AM

Words won't change much.

BlackCrayon 08-12-2010 04:35 AM

king george the 1st and quayle was a joke of an admin.

The Demon 08-12-2010 05:38 AM

Ironically Obama has done more damage in less than 2 years than Bush did in 8, so if Bush was the worst president in history, Obama has already surpassed him.

Barry-xlovecam 08-12-2010 05:45 AM

Ben Quayle, the son of former Vice President Dan Quayle ? words of wisdom from little Mr. Potatoe Head ...

CaptainHowdy 08-12-2010 05:48 AM

Just passing by...

Dating Port 08-12-2010 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409311)
I would like to hear a good argument that he is not. If Bush was the worst president in history and Obama has expanded his policies, how is Obama not the worst?

IMHO - Woodrow Wilson - he sold out America.

Based on what we now know about our banking industry and our national debt.

My argument (and a short history lesson):
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

Happy Reading :2 cents:

TheDoc 08-12-2010 05:50 AM

Is the guy blaming Obama for the Mexican Cartels? Haha.. come on now. And a Tax cartel? What taxes did Obama introduce?

Wow this man can feed the brain dead sheep like no other... just look a them all taking a bite in this thread.

IllTestYourGirls 08-12-2010 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17409461)
Is the guy blaming Obama for the Mexican Cartels? Haha.. come on now. And a Tax cartel? What taxes did Obama introduce?

Wow this man can feed the brain dead sheep like no other... just look a them all taking a bite in this thread.

I didnt even bother listening to him, he's not worth the time. Personally was making a observation. The left calls Bush one of the worst presidents of all time (rightfully so). But then Obama comes in and expands some of the most egregious polices Bush put in place. How does that not by default make Obama the worst president of all time?

12clicks 08-12-2010 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17409461)
Is the guy blaming Obama for the Mexican Cartels? Haha.. come on now. And a Tax cartel? What taxes did Obama introduce?

Wow this man can feed the brain dead sheep like no other... just look a them all taking a bite in this thread.

those of us with intelligence and an understanding of economics understand that ballooning the debt IS a tax he's introduced.
it will eventually have to be paid.

TheDoc 08-12-2010 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409537)
I didnt even bother listening to him, he's not worth the time. Personally was making a observation. The left calls Bush one of the worst presidents of all time (rightfully so). But then Obama comes in and expands some of the most egregious polices Bush put in place. How does that not by default make Obama the worst president of all time?

Other than the patriot act still going, what bad Policies has Obama expanded on? Rather, what has he kept that has hurt us?

Of course some things are still going that many people do and don't agree with. Anti-terrorism program, border security beef up, prison camps / abuse in them, lots of war stuff, telecommunications shit..

Lots of it sucks, I agree but other than funding of the war most of the stuff really isn't hurting us. Obama keeping some of them, makes him a douche bag. It doesn't make him the worst President or even compare to the person that created the policies and has a stack of other shit to go with it.

Basically, until Obama gets up in front of the American people and lies to them, several times, about why we must go to war and then he murders another Leader, and it's all complete bullshit. Then he tortures hundreds of prisoners that did nothing wrong and murdered some of them too... and then turns around and hides all the money and how it's spent and how it's reported...

I mean really, Obama hasn't even scratched the surface yet.

TheDoc 08-12-2010 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17409552)
those of us with intelligence and an understanding of economics understand that ballooning the debt IS a tax he's introduced.
it will eventually have to be paid.

Speaking of intelligence... you seem confused on who created the debt we have.

MrBottomTooth 08-12-2010 07:20 AM

I bet the owner of dirtyscottsdale.com is loving the added type-in traffic.

IllTestYourGirls 08-12-2010 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17409599)
Other than the patriot act still going, what bad Policies has Obama expanded on? Rather, what has he kept that has hurt us?

Of course some things are still going that many people do and don't agree with. Anti-terrorism program, border security beef up, prison camps / abuse in them, lots of war stuff, telecommunications shit..

Lots of it sucks, I agree but other than funding of the war most of the stuff really isn't hurting us. Obama keeping some of them, makes him a douche bag. It doesn't make him the worst President or even compare to the person that created the policies and has a stack of other shit to go with it.

Basically, until Obama gets up in front of the American people and lies to them, several times, about why we must go to war and then he murders another Leader, and it's all complete bullshit. Then he tortures hundreds of prisoners that did nothing wrong and murdered some of them too... and then turns around and hides all the money and how it's spent and how it's reported...

I mean really, Obama hasn't even scratched the surface yet.

Bush lied?

It is up in the air if Bush lied to get us in the war. Many forget he was using Clintons intelligence.





Many forget Clinton supported war against Iraq. His opinion must have been formed with information he gathered during his presidency right?



http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...2618559385027#

The list is endless of the polices Obama has kept and expanded. You are smarter than that.


Edit: I should add it was what Clinton said during the 1990s about Iraq that made me a supporter of the war when it was first started.

Pics Traffic 08-12-2010 07:31 AM

woot woot

https://gfy.com/image.php?u=30699&dateline=1280114743

Pics Traffic 08-12-2010 07:32 AM

Quote:

Quayle recently ran into controversy after admitting to having posted on the controversial website DirtyScottsdale.com four years ago. The racy website features scantily clad women and focuses on profiling the Scottsdale nightclub scene. Quayle told a local TV station Tuesday he posted on the website on behalf of a friend to "drive some traffic."

sure you did. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dvae 08-12-2010 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409651)
Bush lied?

It is up in the air if Bush lied to get us in the war. Many forget he was using Clintons intelligence.

Many forget Clinton supported war against Iraq. His opinion must have been formed with information he gathered during his presidency right?

The list is endless of the polices Obama has kept and expanded. You are smarter than that.


Edit: I should add it was what Clinton said during the 1990s about Iraq that made me a supporter of the war when it was first started.

I really would appreciate it if you would stop posting videos and links of this type.
We can't have the facts come out and expose the truth!!

TheDoc 08-12-2010 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409651)
Bush lied?

It is up in the air if Bush lied to get us in the war. Many forget he was using Clintons intelligence.

Many forget Clinton supported war against Iraq. His opinion must have been formed with information he gathered during his presidency right?

The list is endless of the polices Obama has kept and expanded. You are smarter than that.


Edit: I should add it was what Clinton said during the 1990s about Iraq that made me a supporter of the war when it was first started.

Difference is, Clinton didn't lie. The inspections failed, we went to war with the full backing of the U.N. - Agree with the war or not, he didn't lie.

Bush said Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction that posed a threat to the U.S. - which was complete bullshit, simply because the Bush admin ignored everything that contradicted what they said - and everyone contradicted them outside of our 'own private' intelligence. Bush also said, Saddam tried to buy uranium from one of the shit holes in Africa - ie: Bullshit. Oh we aren't done, a few days later he said a union address: "Our intelligence sources tell us that [Saddam] has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." this is just one of many bullshit lines. Then what happened? Oh yeah... they "shipped out all the weapons...." this is on top of many false claimed reports that never turned up. He then tried to relate 9/11 terrorists as being defectors from Iraq and actually spewed that across the news.

I actually could keep going for an hour.

TheDoc 08-12-2010 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 17409684)
I really would appreciate it if you would stop posting videos and links of this type.
We can't have the facts come out and expose the truth!!

The videos exposed facts we already knew.

We know Iraq kicked out the inspectors, we know it happened many times, we know the U.N. tried to fix it first, we know other Countries and the U.N. backed it, we were told all this and it was all true and we went to war and then came home without murdering the leader.

Vastly different than what happened under the Bush watch.

12clicks 08-12-2010 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17409606)
Speaking of intelligence... you seem confused on who created the debt we have.

Under Bush it reached 1 trillion, under obama its headed for 10 times that. as usual, the only one who's confused is you.

Barefootsies 08-12-2010 08:02 AM


https://youtube.com/watch?v=gJOfZcwznGQ

12clicks 08-12-2010 08:10 AM

I love how the leftists talk about the peaceful country of iraq

Amputate Your Head 08-12-2010 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17409748)
I love how the leftists talk about the peaceful country of iraq

I love how GFY armchair generals talk about Iraq without having ever set foot on Iraqi soil. You wouldn't know an IED if it blew your legs off.

PR_Glen 08-12-2010 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dating Port (Post 17409460)
IMHO - Woodrow Wilson - he sold out America.

Based on what we now know about our banking industry and our national debt.

My argument (and a short history lesson):
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

Happy Reading :2 cents:

very true, but not many look farther back than 10 years into their history before making comments like these :)

TheDoc 08-12-2010 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17409725)
Under Bush it reached 1 trillion, under obama its headed for 10 times that. as usual, the only one who's confused is you.

Again, intelligence? Here let me help, the entire cost of the War was added onto the debt after Obama took office. He corrected the books, I know that's hard for you to gather in that vast mind of yours but blaming Obama for a correction is about the stupidest thing a person could do.

And let's not forget under Bush we have the $280b to Citygroup, $700b asset relief, $25b auto industry, $400b Mae/Mac bailout, $30b Bear Stearns and $20b to the Airline Industry.

That's a lot of Money... 1.46trillion before the illegal war costs or all wars being correctly on the books.

Obama.. $787b bailout, most of the money injected straight into the Economy. Wow, that bad bad Obama. heck, I guess in some far out reach world that some how, some way, in some stupid way.. makes Obama worse than Bush.

Minte 08-12-2010 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17409748)
I love how the leftists talk about the peaceful country of iraq

I have to agree.
With Iran about to become a nuclear power and the next generation of Husseins ready to take power does anyone actually think the middle-east would've been a better place with Saddam Hussein. He clearly showed the world in Halajba that he didn't have any problems using chemical weapons.

xholly 08-12-2010 08:22 AM

that guy in the pic looks like a real cunt. just sayin... carry on.

xholly 08-12-2010 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 17409777)
I have to agree.
With Iran about to become a nuclear power and the next generation of Husseins ready to take power does anyone actually think the middle-east would've been a better place with Saddam Hussein. He clearly showed the world in Halajba that he didn't have any problems using chemical weapons.

theres only one country in the world to ever use atomic weapons on people

TheDoc 08-12-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 17409777)
I have to agree.
With Iran about to become a nuclear power and the next generation of Husseins ready to take power does anyone actually think the middle-east would've been a better place with Saddam Hussein. He clearly showed the world in Halajba that he didn't have any problems using chemical weapons.

I don't understand what you agree with. Most of the "leftist" in those post have actually seen a war zone.

Based on what you said though, we should have kept Saddam in power, meaning Bush shouldn't have killed him, making the war even more wrong, making it the reason why the region is the way it is. Basically slapping the Republicans in the face in this thread.

tony286 08-12-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17409752)
I love how GFY armchair generals talk about Iraq without having ever set foot on Iraqi soil. You wouldn't know an IED if it blew your legs off.

Yep and Doc actually served his country.

pornstar2fag 08-12-2010 08:28 AM

to those talking out of their asses:

all of obama's debt is a byproduct of the bush and clinton administrations. if you don't understand the road the country has taken to get where it's at, please don't take part in conversations like this. you just look silly to those who follow politics.

dyna mo 08-12-2010 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17409797)
theres only one country in the world to ever use atomic weapons on people

saved a lot of lives in the process too. and ended a world war.

Antonio 08-12-2010 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409311)
I would like to hear a good argument that he is not. If Bush was the worst president in history and Obama has expanded his policies, how is Obama not the worst?

There's some truth in that - I expected much more drastic changes, at least as far as the foreign policy goes...

The Demon 08-12-2010 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17409651)
Bush lied?

It is up in the air if Bush lied to get us in the war. Many forget he was using Clintons intelligence.





Many forget Clinton supported war against Iraq. His opinion must have been formed with information he gathered during his presidency right?



http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...2618559385027#

The list is endless of the polices Obama has kept and expanded. You are smarter than that.


Edit: I should add it was what Clinton said during the 1990s about Iraq that made me a supporter of the war when it was first started.

Or that that Clinton removed the caps from bank loans to start the financial crisis. Or that the majority of Democrats agreed to go to war when Bush declared it.

The Demon 08-12-2010 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornstar2fag (Post 17409814)
to those talking out of their asses:

all of obama's debt is a byproduct of the bush and clinton administrations. if you don't understand the road the country has taken to get where it's at, please don't take part in conversations like this. you just look silly to those who follow politics.

Lovely rationalization, but Obama has had plenty of opportunity to reduce the debt. Instead, he's going to triple it and more, if he hasn't already(not sure if exact figures). You don't need to lie to yourself.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...722830706.html


It's Bush's fault!!! Stupid liberals

xholly 08-12-2010 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17409817)
saved a lot of lives in the process too. and ended a world war.

no. It cost a lot of Japanese civilian lives and saved a lot of US military lives, but of course a Jap life is not worth the same eh. And the war pretty much over already.

The Demon 08-12-2010 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly (Post 17409841)
no. It cost a lot of Japanese civilian lives and saved a lot of US military lives, but of course a Jap life is not worth the same eh. And the war pretty much over already.

No, the war in the Pacific was nowhere near ending. It was actually getting worse with the Kamikaze bullshit. I have no problems with the nuke being dropped in a time of war to effectively end the war over there. Instead of blaming the US, blame the ignorant Japanese. Even the Emperor wanted to concede the war.

12clicks 08-12-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17409755)
Again, intelligence? Here let me help, the entire cost of the War was added onto the debt after Obama took office. He corrected the books, I know that's hard for you to gather in that vast mind of yours but blaming Obama for a correction is about the stupidest thing a person could do.

And let's not forget under Bush we have the $280b to Citygroup, $700b asset relief, $25b auto industry, $400b Mae/Mac bailout, $30b Bear Stearns and $20b to the Airline Industry.

That's a lot of Money... 1.46trillion before the illegal war costs or all wars being correctly on the books.

Obama.. $787b bailout, most of the money injected straight into the Economy. Wow, that bad bad Obama. heck, I guess in some far out reach world that some how, some way, in some stupid way.. makes Obama worse than Bush.

silly little leftist. putting the war on the books adds $960 billion. by 2015, the deficit is expected to be 20 trillion dollars and you leftist idiots want to explain how the evil George Bush was responsible for 1/20th of it.

don't worry, you're going to get exactly what you deserve for supporting this clown:thumbsup

xholly 08-12-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17409856)
No, the war in the Pacific was nowhere near ending. It was actually getting worse with the Kamikaze bullshit. I have no problems with the nuke being dropped in a time of war to effectively end the war over there. Instead of blaming the US, blame the ignorant Japanese. Even the Emperor wanted to concede the war.

yeah the Japanese were real militaristic pricks for sure and I do blame them too.. I was just making a point and think it wasn't really necessary except to scare the shit out of the russians maybe but its nothing to do with your conversation here so ill leave it alone.

12clicks 08-12-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17409752)
I love how GFY armchair generals talk about Iraq without having ever set foot on Iraqi soil. You wouldn't know an IED if it blew your legs off.

I love how the unintelligent and unaccomplished think that being a grunt elevates your intelligence to the level of the rest of us with a clue.

a grunt is a grunt for a reason. get back to me when you or the other grunts get promoted.:1orglaugh

lazycash 08-12-2010 08:53 AM

Hey if Ben already knows how to "drive traffic" then he's got my vote.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123