m.yoursite.com or mobile.yoursite.com
 

or does it really not matter?

i would just use your regular url, just render a mobile version without redirecting

I use the m. & mobile. just in case, figure it can't hurt and it's easy to preview.

why not both? and 301 mobile. to m. ?

im an idiot .. never thought of just using both lol

most people just use the m.

This is my answer too

What woj said.

mobile internet is farce

http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/manifesto/


Transcoders MUST not reformat sites with URLs matching one of the following patterns:

m.*
mobile.*
wap.*
*.mobi
pda.*
avantgo.*
iphone.*
wml.*
wireless.*
xhtml.*

Note: In the spirit of erring on the side of non-reformatting, vendors are also welcome to support the following exclusion patterns, where "/" represents the first slash in the url PATH:

*/mobile/
*/iphone/
*/wireless/

I'd say go with m since the fewer characters someone has to type on their phone the better.

Doesn't matter.