GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   .XXX Gets Official Approval (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=975134)

dready 06-25-2010 10:52 AM

.XXX Gets Official Approval
 
Quote:

Official approval has been given for the creation of an internet domain dedicated to pornography.

The board of net overseer Icann gave initial approval for the creation of the .xxx domain at its conference in Brussels.

Icann's approval will kick off a fast-track process to get the porn-only domain set up.

ICM Registry, which is backing the domain, said .xxx would make it easier to filter out inappropriate content.

The decision ends a long campaign by ICM Registry to win approval.

Stuart Lawley, chairman of ICM, welcomed the decision and said it was "great news for those that wish to consume, or avoid, adult content".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10412765.stm

JFK 06-25-2010 10:55 AM

did everyone else, misunderstand what the vote was ? The agreed to consider,considering it. I didnt think it was apporved:2 cents:

Cyandin 06-25-2010 10:59 AM

*sits down* Wow, just wow. Landrush, here we come.

Quentin 06-25-2010 10:59 AM

No, it hasn't.

Good to know we can still count on the media to oversimplify things, though.

colin farrell 06-25-2010 11:01 AM

it has not been aprroved.

dready 06-25-2010 11:03 AM

Well, yeah. The company still has to prove to ICANN that they have the backing of the adult industry... which should be interesting.

Spudstr 06-25-2010 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyandin (Post 17279215)
*sits down* Wow, just wow. Landrush, here we come.

IIRC, you must have the .com to get the .xxx etc. You just can't go buying up every .xxx you can think of.

Regardless much of it is voluntary?

I thik .xxx is the least of everyones concerns, now that the senate approved the creation of the internet kill switch which lets the president nuke public and private networks for 120 days.

I'd be very scared of that one and in fact. I am.

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:05 AM

You just have to go to iffor.org and read what they are all about. They want to control the internet and save the world.

Yo Adrian 06-25-2010 11:07 AM

CNN left out any part of the process to be pending
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/06/...ef=igoogle_cnn

tony286 06-25-2010 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yo Adrian (Post 17279237)
CNN left out any part of the process to be pending
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/06/...ef=igoogle_cnn

yep and this part "Adopting .xxx will be optional. However, some tech blogs speculate a push to make the domain mandatory for adult-only sites." is not good.

Cyber Fucker 06-25-2010 11:12 AM

Excellent! This was what we needed! Now boys and girls prepare your wallets for $XXX preordering fee and $XXX for registration fee! :disgust

baddog 06-25-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 17279206)
did everyone else, misunderstand what the vote was ? The agreed to consider,considering it. I didnt think it was apporved:2 cents:

Ne reason to let facts get in the way.

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17279249)
yep and this part "Adopting .xxx will be optional. However, some tech blogs speculate a push to make the domain mandatory for adult-only sites." is not good.

Just up the religious right's alley. Their way of propagating their hot button agenda's.

baddog 06-25-2010 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spudstr (Post 17279233)

I thik .xxx is the least of everyones concerns, now that the senate approved the creation of the internet kill switch which lets the president nuke public and private networks for 120 days.

Agreed. But the Obama sheeple will never get it.

Cyber Fucker 06-25-2010 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spudstr (Post 17279233)
I thik .xxx is the least of everyones concerns, now that the senate approved the creation of the internet kill switch which lets the president nuke public and private networks for 120 days.

I'd be very scared of that one and in fact. I am.

Nice, I wonder what right has USA to decide about the Internet, isn't it world wide good of all nations? :helpme

Spudstr 06-25-2010 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker (Post 17279275)
Nice, I wonder what right has USA to decide about the Internet, isn't it world wide good of all nations? :helpme

Thats the kicker. I bet we will be seeing level3/etc moving corporations over seas so they cannot be controlled by the US gov. More/less the bill targets the "ability" to do this. Though by doing this, shutting off say Verizons backbone for 120 days will put millions and millions and millions of people without internet or tv. Since services like FiOS go over IP they are all screwed. Not to mention the loss of business etc that would stem from this.

All forms of trading would come to a alt, the economy as we know it would come to a stand still because why? Wall street can't operate. Banks can't do their overnight lending. It would crumble everything.

It truly amazes me that the people in DC really just have no clue, they *think* they are doing something good but in reality they have no concept or idea behind anything or how it works, they just go by whoever lobbies the most and pays the most to get the attention before the gov whether they are right _or_ wrong.

Whats even more funny is 90% of the US gov runs over Verizons network, i.e ELAN/TLS/point to point services. Shutting down private and public networks means the gov in essance, shut itself off.

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:30 AM

This now gives more impetus for the new alternative Internets.

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete (Post 17279327)
That would apply only to those living in the land of the free.

Are you talking about the new Christian States of America?

jollyperv 06-25-2010 11:42 AM

It will be denied once again and that fucking worm will go back into the shadows to plan more scams.

spacedog 06-25-2010 11:43 AM

I love how that fucking piece of shit scumbag Lawley goes around claiming that ICM is a non profit.. What a load of fucking bullshit.. His whole fucking motive behind all this is PROFIT and money.. Mark my fucking words, if this .xxx ever becomes mandatory, I will personally sue him, ICM, IFFOR and ICann.

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:

Over the past four years, ICM has worked with the key constituents within the
Community to develop support for the concept of a non-profit entity
representing responsible members of the online Adult-Entertainment community.
At the time of submission, many of the world�s leading adult-entertainment
companies have expressed support for this application. In particular, as
specifically requested in the RFP, ICM has detailed letters of support from
major providers in the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, and Continental Europe,
expressing support for the sTLD, for the sponsoring organization and for the
proposed policy-formulation process. These supporters either supply services
to, or themselves manage, the majority of adult entertainment on the Internet.
Ahemm...who are they?

gumdrop 06-25-2010 11:46 AM

BTW, you can read the entertaining document here:
http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/xxx.htm

Rather long but an interesting read.

baddog 06-25-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spudstr (Post 17279287)
It truly amazes me that the people in DC really just have no clue, they *think* they are doing something good but in reality they have no concept or idea behind anything or how it works, they just go by whoever lobbies the most and pays the most to get the attention before the gov whether they are right _or_ wrong.

They figure if China has the ability to do it there, they should have the ability to do it here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 17279368)
Mark my fucking words, if this .xxx ever becomes mandatory, I will personally sue him, ICM, IFFOR and ICann.

Right.

SCORE Ralph 06-25-2010 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gumdrop (Post 17279234)
You just have to go to iffor.org and read what they are all about. They want to control the internet and save the world.

Save the internet. Save the world. :1orglaugh

u-Bob 06-25-2010 01:12 PM

fuck the .xxx tld

Fob 06-25-2010 01:56 PM

Why would anyone use the .xxx domain? Might as well use a .info....lol

BlackCrayon 06-25-2010 01:58 PM

when will .porn and .sex be introduced?

seeandsee 06-25-2010 02:00 PM

ICM has said it expected the first .xxx domains to go live in early 2011. It said it had more than 110,000 pre-reservations for .xxx domains.

Spudstr 06-25-2010 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17279377)
They figure if China has the ability to do it there, they should have the ability to do it here.

the difference is china is communist, and they have only one ISP. China telecom.

If the US thought they could put up a great firewall, they would put Verizon, at&t qwest/everyone else out of business.

Chosen 06-25-2010 05:48 PM

Spudstr, you're wrong, China have many ISPs :)

Zorgman 06-25-2010 05:59 PM

I will not be registering .xxx - I prefer my .com names anyway.

crazytrini85 06-25-2010 06:34 PM

Ah yes . . . the Free Speech Coalition once again shows how totally useless they are.

SpongeBub 06-25-2010 07:57 PM

If it is true that you have to own the .com to register the .xxx, then they have shot themselves in the foot big-time. Just no one register any .xxx that you own the .com to and problem solved. The whole TLD will wither and die on the vine.

Spudstr 06-25-2010 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chosen (Post 17280131)
Spudstr, you're wrong, China have many ISPs :)

yes, this is why all their ips belong to the same organization. There is only one controlling entity that controls everything at their great firewall of china.

Brujah 06-25-2010 08:40 PM

Must I hold a name in another TLD to request a reservation for the name in xxx?

In order to use the reservation request process, you must hold the registration for the requested name in another ICANN recognized Top Level Domain, including .com, .net or a country code domain for example. That name must have been registered and in use as an adult site prior to Feb 1 2010. You may submit an expression of interest in names you do not own in other TLDs.

dan@noof 06-25-2010 08:53 PM

So, we can't register yet, right? Currently we are in the reservation phase, yes?

inabon 06-25-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 17279206)
did everyone else, misunderstand what the vote was ? The agreed to consider,considering it. I didnt think it was apporved:2 cents:

yeah i saw it too. they agreed to pass the ball down to some other peeps and talk about it in colombia.

CynBabes 06-25-2010 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spudstr (Post 17279233)
IIRC, you must have the .com to get the .xxx etc. You just can't go buying up every .xxx you can think of.

Regardless much of it is voluntary?

I thik .xxx is the least of everyones concerns, now that the senate approved the creation of the internet kill switch which lets the president nuke public and private networks for 120 days.

I'd be very scared of that one and in fact. I am.

Current law already provides the president with broad authority to take over communications networks, the committee said, pointing to Section 706 of the Communications Act. That portion gives the president authority to "cause the closing of any facility or station for wire communication" and "authorize the use of control of any such facility or station" by the federal government. This can be done if a state or threat of war exists, it does not require advance notification to Congress, and can continue for up to six months after the threat expires.

source: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365709,00.asp

Dirty Dane 06-25-2010 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CynBabes (Post 17280427)
Current law already provides the president with broad authority to take over communications networks, the committee said, pointing to Section 706 of the Communications Act. That portion gives the president authority to "cause the closing of any facility or station for wire communication" and "authorize the use of control of any such facility or station" by the federal government. This can be done if a state or threat of war exists, it does not require advance notification to Congress, and can continue for up to six months after the threat expires.

If Obama turn off porn for 120 days then he will declare war. Not stop it. :pimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123