GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Idiot tea baggars saying idiot things as usual (video) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=972660)

2MuchMark 06-09-2010 05:35 PM

Idiot tea baggars saying idiot things as usual (video)
 

dyna mo 06-09-2010 05:36 PM

gotta give them credit, they are taking action and voting. that's more than what ~70% of the population does.

good for them.

2MuchMark 06-09-2010 05:40 PM


2MuchMark 06-09-2010 05:43 PM


Gouge 06-09-2010 05:46 PM

You cant get much more left than Max Blumenthal, he him self is a radical left wing psycho so its odd that he pokes fun at others when most of his constituents have abandoned him over the years for the same reason. Say what you want about the Tea Party but they got out the vote and had a clean sweep yesterday, come November the burn is going to sting pretty heavy for those on the hard left :thumbsup

sperbonzo 06-09-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17232820)
gotta give them credit, they are taking action and voting. that's more than what ~70% of the population does.

good for them.


No no no!! How DARE they gather together to protest out of control government! They should just stick to working, paying taxes, and taking whatever the government deigns to give them.... leave the government to the political elite that know WAY better than them!!!

You obviously don't understand this vital point.


:disgust

.

jjmerago 06-09-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17232820)
gotta give them credit, they are taking action and voting. that's more than what ~70% of the population does.

good for them.

Tell that to the German Jew in '33 .... "...give the Nazis credit they're taking action and voting ... extermination could be cool."

Tea party members are not Nazis I know this ... Just comparison thinking to the idea that bullshit idiocy is praised on the merits of so called "action".

The problem is too many americans are happy with mediocracy and praise any change rather then actual change that will better their lives. You would rather grease the squeaky wheel rather then replace it with a new and better one.

Spunky 06-09-2010 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 17232843)

Har har,that clip was hilarious

baddog 06-09-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17232820)
gotta give them credit, they are taking action and voting. that's more than what ~70% of the population does.

good for them.

Some people don't understand what it means to not have a monarchy in charge.

jjmerago 06-09-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17232863)
No no no!! How DARE they gather together to protest out of control government!

I want 1 real example of out of control ... just one real example thats it.


Quote:

They should just stick to working, paying taxes, and taking whatever the government deigns to give them....
Yes they should thats called living day to day lives. Its decides not whatever you wrote. I mean you were told to "go to work live your lives" when your government told you ... yes told you ... you had to go to war in Iraq to avoid imminent attack from WMD's. The people protesting that were called traitors. Those people had,what we know now for 100% FACT, legit claims there were no WMD's as apposed to the tea baggers ramblings of bigotry and government oppression.



Quote:

leave the government to the political elite that know WAY better than them!!!

You obviously don't understand this vital point.
I guarantee that if anyone of these teabaggers were approached by special interest and were offered huge $$ to vote against there principals 75% would. There in lies your governments problems. Its not that they think they KNOW BETTER its that they don't think at all and are paid to think by corporate america ... this goes for both parties.

dav3 06-09-2010 06:33 PM

3:03 = lol

dyna mo 06-09-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjmerago (Post 17232905)
Tell that to the German Jew in '33 .... "...give the Nazis credit they're taking action and voting ... extermination could be cool."

Tea party members are not Nazis I know this ... Just comparison thinking to the idea that bullshit idiocy is praised on the merits of so called "action".

The problem is too many americans are happy with mediocracy and praise any change rather then actual change that will better their lives. You would rather grease the squeaky wheel rather then replace it with a new and better one.

everyone thinks everyone else is an idiot. fact is, we have a system in place and they use it. hardly idiotic.

and the nazi comparison is beyond idiotic.

dyna mo 06-09-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17232926)
Some people don't understand what it means to not have a monarchy in charge.

i don't know what you mean, could you rephrase?

jjmerago 06-09-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17232964)
everyone thinks everyone else is an idiot. fact is, we have a system in place and they use it. hardly idiotic.

I don't think there idiots .. I think they are retarded ... I think it idiocy to think that using the system is worthy of praise just for the act itself. Using the system with meaningful reform or actual fact based concerns is worthy of praise.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17232964)
and the nazi comparison is beyond idiotic.

Explanation or you statement is without validity.

dyna mo 06-09-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjmerago (Post 17233125)
I don't think there idiots .. I think they are retarded ... I think it idiocy to think that using the system is worthy of praise just for the act itself. Using the system with meaningful reform or actual fact based concerns is worthy of praise.



Explanation or you statement is without validity.

sure.
you are comparing the tea baggers vote with the outcome/consequences of elections in nazi germany in the 30s.
you think tea baggers are retarded and therefore should not be allowed to vote due to the outcome of that vote.

certainly you can see how hypocritical that is in light of your nazi analogy.

fatfoo 06-09-2010 08:24 PM

After watching this video, I think there might be such a thing as a racist moustache.
Shave it!
http://i49.tinypic.com/23m2d1v.jpg

Vendzilla 06-09-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjmerago (Post 17232947)
I want 1 real example of out of control ... just one real example thats it.

Did you know that Harry Reid has a federally built bridge to his PRIVATE property?

TheDoc 06-09-2010 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17232863)
No no no!! How DARE they gather together to protest out of control government! They should just stick to working, paying taxes, and taking whatever the government deigns to give them.... leave the government to the political elite that know WAY better than them!!!

You obviously don't understand this vital point.


:disgust

.

These people weren't out protesting when Bush was doing billion/trillion dollar bailouts.. of course Bush started most of the bailouts that happened. Yeah, nobody protested his extreme run away spending, let alone his war crimes, murder of a leader, out right lies and basically everything Obama has done, he has done and then some.

It's odd... the only difference really is, race.

TheDoc 06-09-2010 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17233236)
Did you know that Harry Reid has a federally built bridge to his PRIVATE property?

It was near his property, not on it... however it had other added values to the States and rivers they crossed.

dyna mo 06-09-2010 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjmerago (Post 17232947)
I want 1 real example of out of control ... just one real example thats it.


speaking of bridges

2005.

Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. Early on a Saturday morning in August ? the day of the week, and the month of the year, least likely to attract media attention ? President Bush signed into law a highway bill passed by his own party with more than 6,000 earmarked projects.

Bush signed the bill after sternly telling his party he'd veto any highway bill that spent more than $256 billion. He promptly "adjusted" that figure to $284 billion after complaints from party leaders. The bill Bush ultimately signed came at a price of $286 billion, $295 billion if you count a few provisions disguised to make the bill look cheaper than it actually is. Not exactly holding the line.

The Republican Party's wholesale abandonment of limited government principles has been on display since President Bush took office. Government spending under the GOP's reign has soared to historic highs, any way you want to measure it. And in stark contrast to President Reagan ? or even the president's own father?President Bush refuses to rein in spending. He hasn?t used his veto a single time since taking office ? the longest such streak in U.S. history.

What continues to amaze, however, is the sheer arrogance and hubris with which the Republicans have chosen to govern. As Congressman Jeff Flake ? one of the few principled Republicans in Washington ? told the Washington Post, "Republicans don't even pretend anymore."

Consider that highway bill. The bill calls for nearly half a billion dollars to build two bridges in Alaska. One will connect the Alaskan mainland with a tiny island called Gravina (population: 50). It will cost U.S. taxpayers $230 million. In fact, when it comes to pork barrel politics, Alaska is the new West Virginia. That's because Alaska Rep.Don Young chairs the transportation committee. The transportation bill is named after Young's wife. The second bridge the bill appropriates money for ? another $230 million ? will be called "Don Young Way."

directfiesta 06-09-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 17232843)

This was and is so funny ...

ThunderBalls 06-09-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17233240)
These people weren't out protesting when Bush was doing billion/trillion dollar bailouts.. of course Bush started most of the bailouts that happened. Yeah, nobody protested his extreme run away spending, let alone his war crimes, murder of a leader, out right lies and basically everything Obama has done, he has done and then some.

They were to busy taking Viagra and jerking off to the Iraq war on Fox News.

directfiesta 06-09-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17233245)
It was near his property, not on it... however it had other added values to the States and rivers they crossed.

it is not even built ... lol

Quote:

Construction on the bridge is expected to begin in 2010 and continue until 2013.
and it was a bi-partisan project :

Quote:

? Rep. Porter actively worked to get funding for this project, voted in favor of the legislation, and sent out press releases claiming credit.

? Senator Ensign supports federal funding for the new bridge and took credit for the $500,000 earmark in FY04 in two press releases

? Trent Franks, the Congressman who represents Bullhead City, AZ, supports federal funding of this new bridge. Franks is ranked the 5th most conservative member in the House and is member of the Republican Study Committee, but he voted yes on final passage of this legislation.

? Gov. Kenny Guinn supports the Laughlin Bridge: ?I have been and remain strongly supportive of the development of a second bridge over the Colorado River in Laughlin. A new bridge is badly needed to address the overflow of traffic that is now streaming through Laughlin and over the Colorado River as a result of travel limitations that were put on the Hoover Dam and Davis Dam after the attacks of September 11, 2001.? [statement below]
Typical Tea Party deformation of facts ....

Coup 06-10-2010 02:34 AM

Tea baggers are amerikkka personified.

Coup 06-10-2010 02:48 AM

fun teabagger game:

ask your local tea bagger if the government should cut spending

when they say yes, show them this and ask where alot of spending could be cut from
http://www.linkydinky.com/images/budgetgraphics.jpeg

http://www.linkydinky.com/images/budgetgraphics.jpeg

be prepared to stand there for a a few minutes while they search for "muh tax dollars being given to lazy niggers and spics"

Ethersync 06-10-2010 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 17232814)

There are idiots on both sides of the isle...







Here's another Republican idiot...


Serial Pervert 06-10-2010 07:09 AM

idiots are so idiot!

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17233253)
speaking of bridges

2005.

Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. Early on a Saturday morning in August ? the day of the week, and the month of the year, least likely to attract media attention ? President Bush signed into law a highway bill passed by his own party with more than 6,000 earmarked projects.

Bush signed the bill after sternly telling his party he'd veto any highway bill that spent more than $256 billion. He promptly "adjusted" that figure to $284 billion after complaints from party leaders. The bill Bush ultimately signed came at a price of $286 billion, $295 billion if you count a few provisions disguised to make the bill look cheaper than it actually is. Not exactly holding the line.

The Republican Party's wholesale abandonment of limited government principles has been on display since President Bush took office. Government spending under the GOP's reign has soared to historic highs, any way you want to measure it. And in stark contrast to President Reagan ? or even the president's own father?President Bush refuses to rein in spending. He hasn?t used his veto a single time since taking office ? the longest such streak in U.S. history.

What continues to amaze, however, is the sheer arrogance and hubris with which the Republicans have chosen to govern. As Congressman Jeff Flake ? one of the few principled Republicans in Washington ? told the Washington Post, "Republicans don't even pretend anymore."

Consider that highway bill. The bill calls for nearly half a billion dollars to build two bridges in Alaska. One will connect the Alaskan mainland with a tiny island called Gravina (population: 50). It will cost U.S. taxpayers $230 million. In fact, when it comes to pork barrel politics, Alaska is the new West Virginia. That's because Alaska Rep.Don Young chairs the transportation committee. The transportation bill is named after Young's wife. The second bridge the bill appropriates money for ? another $230 million ? will be called "Don Young Way."

The Tea Party was not formed yet, this thread is about the Tea Party. I believe that the Tea Party will go after any big spending like this. Regardless of parties.

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17233245)
It was near his property, not on it... however it had other added values to the States and rivers they crossed.

I know it's not on his property, but isn't funny how he profited from this legislation?

dyna mo 06-10-2010 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234265)
The Tea Party was not formed yet, this thread is about the Tea Party. I believe that the Tea Party will go after any big spending like this. Regardless of parties.

dude asked for an example of gov out of control. i provided one. i chose it because the fact is gov has been out of control for a while now and it doesn't matter whether repubs or dems are in charge.

the tea party has formed? i wasn't aware it's now a legitimate party in our 2 party system, thx for the update!

TheDoc 06-10-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234273)
I know it's not on his property, but isn't funny how he profited from this legislation?

He didn't profit from it... he could have, might have at some point... but didn't so far.

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17234284)
dude asked for an example of gov out of control. i provided one. i chose it because the fact is gov has been out of control for a while now and it doesn't matter whether repubs or dems are in charge.

the tea party has formed? i wasn't aware it's now a legitimate party in our 2 party system, thx for the update!

you know better, they aren't a party, they just call them selves one on the name. They say they are against all out of control spending, I'm with them on that. I see the big push with the GOP to get back to conservative roots. I also see that has made a difference this last Tuesday. We'll see what it does in November, but I see alot of incumbents packing their bags. Back to the Tea Party, I hope they can pull together some kind of structure or they will fall apart. I would hate to see that
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17234316)
He didn't profit from it... he could have, might have at some point... but didn't so far.

You're saying the value of his property didn't go up?

TheDoc 06-10-2010 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234383)
You're saying the value of his property didn't go up?

Well they say "it might" increase the value of his property, however it's safe to say everyones property value in the area will increase then - much like normal construction does.

Dirty Lord 06-10-2010 09:00 AM

euaheauiheuaha
funnie

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17234412)
Well they say "it might" increase the value of his property, however it's safe to say everyones property value in the area will increase then - much like normal construction does.

You sound like a BP spokesman trying to tell us that the oil spill was a good thing because it pointed out a need for safer drilling.

http://www.moneyteachers.org/images/...eid-finger.jpg

If you look into Reids dealings with the help of his sons and all the money he has made while in office, you would know he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him.

Poindexterity 06-10-2010 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234265)
The Tea Party was not formed yet, this thread is about the Tea Party. I believe that the Tea Party will go after any big spending like this. Regardless of parties.

exactly the point.
these people were still alive then, still watching the news then, still of voting age then, but it was a white guy doing all the evil shit, so they were cool with it.

soon as a black dude jumps on the same evil horse they ALL been riding since jefferson, NOW all of a sudden they care.

jus dun smell right to me, eh?

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poindexterity (Post 17234484)
exactly the point.
these people were still alive then, still watching the news then, still of voting age then, but it was a white guy doing all the evil shit, so they were cool with it.

soon as a black dude jumps on the same evil horse they ALL been riding since jefferson, NOW all of a sudden they care.

jus dun smell right to me, eh?

WTF are you talking about?
So I guess the black Tea Party members are just tokens?
It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, it's about how he's fucking up, are we suppose to give him a pass based on his skin color, are you a fucking NUT?

directfiesta 06-10-2010 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234499)
WTF are you talking about?
So I guess the black Tea Party members are just tokens?
It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, it's about how he's fucking up, are we suppose to give him a pass based on his skin color, are you a fucking NUT?

Dind't see any blacks in the first video ... neither other races to that effect ....

... So Reid is making money ... how awfull ... lol .. on a bi-partisan bridge.. Good to know that the TP is against wealth ... :1orglaugh

TheDoc 06-10-2010 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234452)
You sound like a BP spokesman trying to tell us that the oil spill was a good thing because it pointed out a need for safer drilling.

http://www.moneyteachers.org/images/...eid-finger.jpg

If you look into Reids dealings with the help of his sons and all the money he has made while in office, you would know he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him.

Of course he has done things that benefit him, every single politician does this. It is a business after all.

Anyway, someone else said build the bridges here and here, he simply suggested the funds that would pay for it.

If I owned property in the area that someone else proposed a bridge, I would support it too - any logical business man would.

TheDoc 06-10-2010 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17234499)
WTF are you talking about?
So I guess the black Tea Party members are just tokens?
It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, it's about how he's fucking up, are we suppose to give him a pass based on his skin color, are you a fucking NUT?

Not everyone is racially motivated.. however 99% are.

Obama hasn't actually fucked up anything, he has done things you don't agree with though. Obama hasn't done nothing that can compare to Bush, not even 1% compare to the damage Bush did to your nation and our image.

It's sooooo racially motivated, that it's actually pathetic and makes me feel sad that I'm American.

Vendzilla 06-10-2010 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17234571)
Not everyone is racially motivated.. however 99% are.

Obama hasn't actually fucked up anything, he has done things you don't agree with though. Obama hasn't done nothing that can compare to Bush, not even 1% compare to the damage Bush did to your nation and our image.

It's sooooo racially motivated, that it's actually pathetic and makes me feel sad that I'm American.

When are you going to give up on blaming Bush, Obama owns the office now doesn't he?

And please take off the rose glasses, Debt went up how much? Unemployment rate went up and stayed there, he fucked that up. The only new jobs are government jobs that put a bigger tax burden on those that STILL have jobs!
He won't even talk to the guy in charge of the oil spill.
He's scrambling to figure out how to get out of the Seestak mess.
He's a racist, remember the beer summit, he has done a real good job with the Arab nations and Israel, showing his Islamic Up bringing.


And the best you can do is defend him because he's black? These people are made of of a bunch of citizens that are pissed, yeah, some may be racially motivated, so what? Why do you think Obama is against the Arizona law? Why does he want to make them citizens? Because the Mexican voters will vote for his party.
Letting the Mexican President bash Arizona in front of congress, I would have stood up and told him to fuck off! Good thing IM not a congressman!
I don't give a flying fuck what party is in control as long they work for the country and do some good, 94 to 2000 was pretty good, we had GOP controled house and senate and a dem for a president, even though that asshat bypassed congress and the senate to loan Mexico over 20 billion dollars with the help of Goldman Sachs, they made money on that, but thats the kinda shit that bothers me.

I'm not happy with what Bush did, but let it rest and clean up the mess, Obama has just made it worse

Ethersync 06-10-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17234538)
Dind't see any blacks in the first video ... neither other races to that effect ....

... So Reid is making money ... how awfull ... lol .. on a bi-partisan bridge.. Good to know that the TP is against wealth ... :1orglaugh













All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123