![]() |
Which tour do you like more?
We just recently put out our new HD lesbian site and we did a pretty fancy tour:
http://tour.jennyandjill.com/ But I'm not really sure it worked so we did a more simple one: http://tour2.jennyandjill.com/ Which do you like better? |
I think you will do better with #2. :2 cents:
I would reduce the background some more though, it's taking focus off what's important. |
Both are good. First one leaves a very warm impression. Second one is better for SEO. Good job.
|
I like them both but prefer #2.
#1 also seems to take forever to load. |
I like the scrolling on #1 but if I had to choose I would pick #2.
Can't quite put my finger on what I like better... probably first impression and familiarity of the layout style. _ |
They were both very slow loading... (on 24mbps)
#2 looks like your typical boring profile with description so my vote goes to #1. |
split test
. |
Quote:
|
They both look nice but if I had to pick one I would go with tour2.
|
I agree that #2 will most likely do better on SE and so forth, and probably better in sales, which is your goal, but the question was which one do I like the best and I like #1 better, so I voted that one. :)
Both are very nice though. :) |
Tour 2. I gave up waiting for tour 1 to load.
|
I think tour 2 by a long mile. Just get rid of the background, it adds a lot of noise and nothing in return :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
First tour is better because of more high quality sample photos.
|
I voted for #1. They were both kind of slow, 1 looks better.
|
Thanks for everyone's input. I guess simple sells.
|
#2 one (loads better, looks better...)
|
Quote:
|
#2 seems to hold the attention better
|
#1 is more original, so I think it will be do better
(even though I think the design of #2 looks better) |
both great designs, a little too much going on in number 1 though, number 2 follows the Z eye flow method better
|
Takes too long to load No.1 I voted for No.2
|
Who gives a fuck about what anyone likes Test them and use the one that sells better.
jeeeez |
#2 by a long long way plus it loads 4 times faster too.
|
Hi Jay,
A/B testing will give the right answer. |
I like #1 better. It looks like you are loading 15 scenes in that scrolly area vs. 4 on version #2. This is probably why #1 loads slower.
|
I like simple tour more!
|
second tour looks good, better than #1 I think.
|
#1 loads much longer. #2 color usage is questionable. I'd say #2 anyway.
|
Thanks for everyone's input!
|
Quote:
|
I like the simple one better, but my reaction might be different with a bit of retouching on the top pic for the fancy one.
|
I agree with #2
|
Quote:
1. Simple one converts better 2. Fancy one gets more join clicks |
I like them both but prefer no 2
|
Quote:
|
#2 > #1
8char limit gfy pisses me off |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123