GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Please review this gallery (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=96861)

beemk 12-30-2002 06:01 PM

Please review this gallery
 
i didnt make this gallery but can you guys review it for me before i submit it? http://www.idthumbs.com/ms/01

thanks

dirtyone 12-30-2002 06:06 PM

Tired of site out there ... should be sites

and I dont really care for all that text at the top anyway

looks a little bland color wise

otherwise it looks ok to me

:2 cents:

ZoiNk 12-30-2002 06:07 PM

The person is marketing that name of the paysite a lot with those pictures... Max Softcore. With softcore, about that hardest you will find is dildo penetration... which is what that gallery is. No incentive to buy, since you are giving them basically what you will get in a paysite. If you are showing pics like that, emphasize movies, not teen softcore pics. Just my :2 cents:
ZoiNk

Libertine 12-30-2002 06:18 PM

I think this content is not really suitable for promoting a softcore site. If you target the softcore audience, insertion close-ups might not be the best thing to show.

Niki 12-30-2002 06:22 PM

now, that's some softcore gallery :)

WendyB 12-30-2002 06:57 PM

I just for the fun of it ran your gallery URL in one of my tgp's submission checker.

There were some elements that would get you declined.

302 redirect(s) detected from link on your page.
"pop-ups/CJ"
The baned words "enter here" detected
Banned HTML deetected.
There were a couple images that would be considered too graphic for the catigory suggested.

The top and botom banner.

Although your gallery on the surface looks better than most that I spot review, I would have to pass on adding this one, as presented. There's an old saying. Less is sometimes better.

galleriesx 12-30-2002 07:12 PM

Design is good.... but the girl is damn ugly :(

Nikkey 12-30-2002 07:29 PM

That chick is nasty, put a bag over here head!

demented 12-30-2002 07:36 PM

Yeah I agree... Site is designed well, But that bitch is just gross.

Marcus 12-30-2002 07:51 PM

Great design, I dont like the text.

I wouldn't use the words "Ultra Hot Babe", "Luscious body" or "hot" in the same page as this girl.
The surfer is going to think you're lying to them and they won't buy.

I think it's best to just be honest with the surfer or instead use a model who really is hot.

If you insist on using this model then I would talk about how she's truly 18 and how she's an amateur.

I would do a little fake bio like they do on the other girls in the tour.
But unless youre promoting a greasy hair site, I don't think she'll sell many memberships to anything looking like that. No offense to you : )

Saintgames 12-30-2002 07:55 PM

Butt Ugly Girl... my 2 cents. Seems others were paying closer attention to the design. =)

Marcus 12-30-2002 07:56 PM

And I wouldn't list a gallery that said "High school seniors"
unless it had something on the bottom that says "All models are 18 years old or over"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123