Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11
 

Note: this does not reflect my personal views, but is an interesting article.


FULL ARTICLE: http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-si...ding-7-on-911/

A bit about Silverstein...

Wikipedia: Larry Silverstein

Posted this yesterday, went right over people's heads. Instead of debunking jessie ventura this article just proved what he's been saying all along.

People are truly brainwashed and it doesn't matter what you show them, they'll stick to the bogus offical story no matter what. You could have Bush come out and say it was an inside job and people would say "wow bush is a loon, give me some of what he's smokin". Basically cause they wouldn't know what to do if the "conspiracy theory" was actually true so they live in la la land.

he's paying 10 mill rent a month, on a vacant piece of land in the former trade centre complex, OUCH :2 cents:

Why would you destroy something and then legally have to rebuild it for more money than you got from insurers?

hearsay is hardly proof of anything, he heard third hand rumours. Why would all these guys know who he was on the phone with anyways.

But lets just suppose it is true, it merely proves larry was more worried about money than saving people, that kind of goes without saying.

From what I read it was a reporter that was there. They tend to be credible. Maybe I'm missing something.

fire yeah right

Sources? re. Silverstein's phone call to the insurance company.

Because, although many witnesses and recordings recall that it was known the building was going to fall, it has been flatly denied since the Silverstein "pull it" comment was pointed out...

:D

what r firefighters saying?

This story will never go away.

The government account is not true, and the truthers accounts, although more believable, will never be fully accepted either.

Reminds me of this type of story...

An alien ship lands in Smalltown USA. Everyone in the town saw it, and many tell of the alien creatures and ship that they saw removed by the government.

Rather than dispute this straight on, the government blurs the story by adding absurd information to the mix.

Pretty soon a known drunk is talking about how the little green guys did a dance for the townies, complete with music and lights. Another "witness" reports having been anally probed by the aliens, and so on.

In the end the story becomes so far fetched that is is no longer credible.

Even if it was originally true....

Dont forget the tax rright offs.

Can we blame Obama somehow?

:1orglaugh

I'm confused, Paul Watson and Alex Jones have been on Coast to Coast several times talking and debating the very subject matter of Building 7. So why now would they need some Fox News contributor who gets paid $50 a piece to support the original claims that they themselves have been saying for years?

Alex Jones hates Fox News and bash's them every chance he gets but now hes going to use an article they posted of supporting proof of what he has been saying all along. Nothing in the Fox News article is new or even compeling, its all rehashed shit thats already been said by hundreds of people so whats the big deal all of a sudden?

Anyone else think this just doesn't feel or sound right?

Because usually people wont believe something unless its said on a mainstream source. The fact that Silverstein had the option to demolish his building that day has never ever been brought up in mainstream media. Before this, it was only by "conspiracy kooks" that had this assumption. What do you mean its the same ole shit being rehashed?

Alex is cool but he will never talk about the 95% israeli involvement in 9/11 which makes me wonder about him.

Owner of Trade Center - Jewish
Writer of our patriot act - Michael Chertoff (dual citizen)
Head of 9/11 commission - Dual Citizen
Company in charge of airport security- israeli
Mossad agents arrested with explosives on 9/11 detained and released after 71 days.

Lots more israel "coincidences" Here
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/...php?f=6&t=5367

Glad that we have dual citizens writing our laws and investigating attacks on our soil.
Strange indeed. Anyone who thinks these facts are racist is obviously not a true american.

Sort of like the government calling the tea parties racist radicals.....

Building 7 is the smoking gun.

So if Tower 7 was already rigged with controlled explosives, one would assume that the other two towers were rigged the same way.

Until Larry Silverstein himself states that the building was rigged for demolition and he ordered it to be demolished there is no smoking bomb and even if he makes said statement there still will not be a smoking bomb...as it had been determined that the building was probably on the verge of falling.

Right! even if he states it himself that he had explosives already placed in the building, that will make no difference. Are you serious? Some people are born to be cattle.

the two main towers were completely rigged... see explosions here..

Yea, there's been video of him saying 'Pull it' on the net for years.

j$tyles WN4L

Educate me...what difference would it make as to the events of 9/11...if he indeed had the building rigged for demolition...which I will never believe until he himself states it to be true.

I have been saying this for years.


.

Did anyone die from the tower 7 fall?

It's true because we all know the brothas don't have tea partys.

Call me nuts, but I think it would indicate a bit of foreknowledge of this whole event taking place. Unless building owners rigging their buildings with explosives is the "in" thing these days.

ok you're nuts.

I am aware and have been aware of the video...but in what context was "pull it" used. Did he mean pull the firefighters and police out of the building to not and try to save the building as it appeared the building was on the verge of collapse. Others that have claimed to have spoken with him about this matter say that is what he was referring to.

If he in fact had the building had been rigged for demolition I am satisfied that his insurance coverage would be voided...and there would probably be a criminal investigation since I seriously doubt that it is legal to pre rig a building for demolition while that building is exposed to the public for use and has people employed there.

Beat me to it.

I can't believe I even had to explain that to you. You actually imply that there is nothing weird about larry having his buildings wired on 9/11.

No I did not imply any such thing...re read my posts. We were attacked by a foreign entity and whether or not he had a building rigged for demo would not alter that fact.

Then he would have said something like 'pull them'.

It makes a huge difference cause it shifts the blame of who was truly behind the attack.. Unless Bin Laden rigged his building. Actually, people would probably believe that one too if wolf blitzer or sean hannity said it was so.

I can't believe you shot your dog! You fucking ass wipe!


.

oh my god

""Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel - Samuel Johnson

From Wikipedia

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere."

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted[citation needed] and the proposals included in the plan were never executed.

Building7 tenants:

Tenant Square Feet
Salomon Smith Barney 1,202,900
IRS Regional Council 90,430
U.S. Secret Service 85,343
C.I.A. N/A N/A Government
American Express Bank International 106,117
Standard Chartered Bank 111,398
Provident Financial Management 9,000
ITT Hartford Insurance Group 122,590
First State Management Group, Inc 4,000
Federal Home Loan Bank 47,490
NAIC Securities 22,500
Securities & Exchange Commission 106,117
Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt 45,815

source http://www.wtc7.net/background.html

Never executed...are the keywords. Ever heard of brainstorming and the methodology used to brainstorm. The US has think tanks...civilian and military...that propose all types of plans and contingency plans...verging from the ludicrous onward. Get over it.

Yeah if it was executed, you'd be the first one calling for castro's head and calling people like me retarded for questioning the events.

The guy in this video would know better than you or the writer of that site:

Hey king, executed ..... like your loyal dog? You fuck!


.

Well...it is clear that you are begging for my attention. It was my dog...it is my way...it is my life. I do things as I choose to and do not need...want...or ask for your approval...thank you very much. You are now dismissed.

Why would he say "pull it" to mean "get the firefighters out" - that makes no sense in that context.

Not begging for attention, just reminding you you are a total douche.


.

this guy talks more sense than official story ever did..

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...