GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   First ever British PM tv debate about to start (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=963694)

Sarah_Jayne 04-15-2010 12:23 PM

First ever British PM tv debate about to start
 
My predictions are that Clegg will come off the most reasonable because most people haven't heard much of him in the past and he doesn't have to worry about actually being PM. Brown will pull a Nixon and will suffer from not looking as good on tv as the other two. Cameron will come off too slick and polished.

Nobody will really change their vote based on it.

David! 04-15-2010 12:27 PM

It's the first time they have a TV debate for PM in the UK? wow!

Domain Diva 04-15-2010 12:29 PM

I was reading about him yesterday..I didnt know he had a glass eye due to a detached retina he sustained playing rugby as a student....:( (the PM)

flashfire 04-15-2010 12:47 PM

are they debating who has the worse teeth

Sarah_Jayne 04-15-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCO_David (Post 17035944)
It's the first time they have a TV debate for PM in the UK? wow!

Yes because in a parliamentary system nobody is voting for the actual party leader apart from his (or her) own constituents. You vote for your local MP and then whoever has the most MPs is the ruling party. The party then votes for their leader and that leader is the PM. Things are taking a much more presidential path these days (many would say not for the good) and these debates are reflecting that.

David! 04-15-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 17036017)
Yes because in a parliamentary system nobody is voting for the actual party leader apart from his (or her) own constituents. You vote for your local MP and then whoever has the most MPs is the ruling party. The party then votes for their leader and that leader is the PM. Things are taking a much more presidential path these days (many would say not for the good) and these debates are reflecting that.

Ah, but I take it if you vote for one party, then you expect that party to name its leader as PM if they win a majority... Still surprising they haven't had a PM debate, makes for some good TV moments :)

Sarah_Jayne 04-15-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCO_David (Post 17036029)
Ah, but I take it if you vote for one party, then you expect that party to name its leader as PM if they win a majority... Still surprising they haven't had a PM debate, makes for some good TV moments :)

Yeah, that is how it works really. Which is a bit sad because then people don't know who they are actually voting for which is their MP. I actually had a bit of an angry exchange today on Facebook (of all places) with my local Labour candidate on why she hasn't even visited my area in her campaign. Yet, we are suppose to vote for her. It allows MPs to be 'faceless' and get away with things they couldn't if people actually knew their face.

borked 04-15-2010 02:00 PM

pfffft. That wasn't a public debate, but more like a sterile round robin Q&A session.

pathetic all of em.

scarlettcontent 04-15-2010 02:22 PM

was a joke, all talk no action as usual.

Sly 04-15-2010 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 17036017)
Yes because in a parliamentary system nobody is voting for the actual party leader apart from his (or her) own constituents. You vote for your local MP and then whoever has the most MPs is the ruling party. The party then votes for their leader and that leader is the PM. Things are taking a much more presidential path these days (many would say not for the good) and these debates are reflecting that.

I guess one can say that the electoral college is somewhat similar to that.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123