FuckYouCash's sites are banned by review sites?
 

what's the point?:helpme

post proof.

What's the point? I don't know. Maybe you can shine some light on this topic. Any ideas on why they would be banned? And, how do you know they are banned?

Why would they be banned, they are 100% legit and pay always and on time every time.

I smell something fishy and drama related going on here....:helpme

i can`t trust you :)

proof below

http://www.rabbitsreviews.com/s5812/40-Oz-Bounce.html
http://www.thebestporn.com/review/40ozbounce/

interesting. would like to know this skinny.

could it be because of all hidden charges?

The quality and amount of their content is just amazing. The Porn Pros network updates daily, has a lot of niche and easy to navigate.


Oh well...it might be the cross sales but not really sure why..

looks like review sites from same owner

This should answer a lot of your questions:

http://www.livereviews.com/1988/Adul...-Teen-GFS.html

That's a joke right or did I miss some announcement?

forcing you to take a trial looks like, I love the way that chick introduces the review, zero emotion as she says sexy girls sucking cock, fucking, getting sprayed with cum or simply getting drunk and stripping naked for the camera.

What's the difference between photo and image updates :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What's the point of these reviews? No one is going to sign up after watch it.

:1orglaugh

definitely no :thumbsup

Yeah, I guess they hope the viewer wont watch all the way to 3:20... ;)

we run a pretty large review site, and we rank them at the very top because they perform and pay the most.

My guess would be to school the surfers into signing up for programs running sites that are clean so they won't be turned off and go to tubes for their jerk-off sessions.

different owners

Is that a serious question? :1orglaugh

Truthful negative reviews bolsters the sites rep and gives legitimacy to the other positive reviews.

Who is going to trust a review site without any bad reviews?

shady selling they do
http://www.livereviews.com/1988/Adul...-Teen-GFS.html answers indeed a lot of questions
Looks to me they do a lot of trouble to rip off people

This is not A FYC site...
http://prettyincash.com/external.php?page=sites&nats=

cmon ppl!!!

And last I checked Rabbits Reviews and the Bestporn are not owned by the same co unless I missed the memo

there's some pretty solid reason for that

way to go for other webmasters

That is called a directory... not a review site... review sites are from a consumer perspective... :2 cents:

these video reviews/walkthroughs are really interesting, nice!

christ, after looking at the livereview they really rake the surfer over the coals during signup....me thinks i might remove my links...

Shady selling or not FYC converts and pays.

pre checked cross sales are bad enough..this is the first time i've seen you actually be forced to click the trial before being given the user/pass for the site you just signed up for, good god. you can't blame people going to tubes when this is the bullshit they have to deal with when they actually want to pay.

i am sorry
but you are wrong

http://www.teengfs.com/ is having in the footer a model sign up link, goes to the same model agency as i see in the footer of http://www.pornpros.com
http://www.modelsplash.com/ is in the center of those 2, logical I can come to the conclusion we have 2 different sponsors, but they are run by the same team.

Sometimes you have to look a little deeper to find the associations
Please check this for yourself if you still doubt me

FYC is also running TeenGFS. Thats all... FYC is not coming inside this thread to make a comment I am pretty sure.

Yes, same gang

They might but hopefully you're trying to stay in this business long term. Consider what happens when a surfer visits one of your sites and then is referred to a site like the one mentioned above. You think they're going to come back to your site again for another referral? So, while you may make a buck now, how much future money did that buck cost you? And me? And every other webmaster in the industry.

I'm all for pre-checked cross-sales above the submit. But the shit they're pulling in that livereview video is, IMHO, a tremendous long-term detriment to the health of our industry.

One thing that was interesting about the live review video - the reviewer keeps mentioning that the videos are shot and sent in by "regular people". Okay but he doesn't mention that 90% of the videos are by Amber Sky, so if you don't happen to like her, you are out of luck.

I know Rabbits Reviews does not review them. There is a notice on their saying they no longer do business with them.

it's because of xsales

:1orglaugh

Just made yourself look like an idiot.

You all suck at playing sherlock holmes.
I am the owner of PrettyInCash. I do not own FuckYouCash, and they do not own my sites or program.
They fly a link at the bottom of their network in accordance to a deal with have.

If I was them I would want those sites removed from Rabbits and Pinks.

They are targetting out the FYC sites on the sites, and using your sites names to bounce traffic to their niche pages.

If they weren't doing business with you, they should pull those landing pages down. But they won't, cause they want that traffic generated.

DMCA that shit.

deleted
the next post proves it

orly?

Hey xxxxxxx,

We wanted to let you know our program is now finally being rolled out. If you haven't heard of PrettyInCash.com - you will shortly. Please check out our first site TeenGFS.com - This site is doing incredibly well, converting at under 1:500 overall and paying out PPS, the only site within that niche we know of with real amateur content paying out a PPS on trials! We also have rev-share for those that enjoy those payouts.

Your username is below. If you're a member of FuckYouCash, your password should be the same.
If not, or you've forgotten your password, we have included a link for your to get your password.

not that i care. i like both programs.

yarly :)
we share some resources, but FYC does not own PIC, and PIC does not own FYC.
I'm not sure why this is being argued, seeing as I'm the owner of PIC, but hey.
FYC and PIC are not even on the same continent :winkwink:

The fun never ends at GFY.

Dear Would Be Hardy Boys:
 

Domain Name: PRETTYINCASH.COM
Registrar: MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, INC.
Whois Server: whois.moniker.com
Referral URL: http://www.moniker.com/whois.html
Name Server: NS.ISPRIME.COM
Name Server: NS2.ISPRIME.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 10-dec-2009
Creation Date: 02-jul-2007
Expiration Date: 02-jul-2011


Domain Name: FUCKYOUCASH.COM
Registrar: MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, INC.
Whois Server: whois.moniker.com
Referral URL: http://www.moniker.com/whois.html
Name Server: NS.ISPRIME.COM
Name Server: NS2.ISPRIME.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 12-jan-2010
Creation Date: 16-feb-2006
Expiration Date: 16-feb-2011

Please draw your own conclusions, and feel free to post PROOF.

Your friendly [pen name] author,

Franklin W. Dixon

I like that Live Review.Com It opens yours eyes as to what goes on and why surfers get so pissed at adult

To be very terse, we can't cater to everyone. Right now we are focused strictly on performance and conversion. The review sites that care about that, love us. To keep things strictly about the #s, our lifetime value with these review sites particularly mentioned hover at $25 (that represents a $17.95 full with approx 1.5 months retention), before even getting into affiliate payouts, processing fees, and everything else. If you want to run the #s, take out 60% for affiliate payout, 10% reserve, and 15% for overall processing fees, and you can see what you are left with. When we looked at the complaints on their sites, we saw many ppl saying their download managers cant download our entire members sections quick enough. These surfers tend to represent the most educated surfers, and given the #s and the amount of joins sent, it simply makes sense for everyone to go off on their own ways. I'd prefer not to link back to them as well, and risk their reviews actually ranking in Google for our site names, where the join gets filtered to a lower revenue model with discount pricing. For us it didn't make sense, and apparently for them it didn't make sense.

I wish those guys nothing but the best of luck. This wasn't a big deal for them to remove us, and it wasn't a big deal for us either. Really at end of day its about being focused on your core business and you can't keep everyone happy 100% of the time. :2 cents:

That's a bitch move on rabbit's part to send the link back to the page rather than just removing it.

Who's the idiot now? Straight from the horse's mouth.

i didn't think people could do much worse than prechecked crossales under the submit button but your program managed to..wow. Do you have any concern that while the money from the forced crossales may be nice now they are going to ruin any future customers? I wonder how much conversions would improve if the sign up process was stress free and you didn't always have double check you're not getting fucked.

I think our conversion process would improve by 0% and in fact, I've tested this. My statistical analysis have shown that porn buyers tend to be impulsive, there tends to be more new buyers coming in and leaving in a very fast circular door situation, vs 1 time buyers in the business picking and choosing a new porn site every month to purchase. I think the amount of free porn out on the market proves that theres a lot of free alternatives and little incentive to buy month after month, especially since very few people even have a product that is better than a tube site. I won't even go into the details of increasing rebill decline rates and everything else that prove what I'm saying is factual. Those are the #s we see. I am now officially done here. :2 cents: