Aspartame has been renamed and is now being marketed as a natural sweetener
 

In response to growing awareness about the dangers of artificial sweeteners, what does the manufacturer of one of the world's most notable artificial sweeteners do? Why, rename it and begin marketing it as natural, of course. This is precisely the strategy of Ajinomoto, maker of aspartame, which hopes to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with its rebranded version of aspartame, called "AminoSweet".

Over 25 years ago, aspartame was first introduced into the European food supply. Today, it is an everyday component of most diet beverages, sugar-free desserts, and chewing gums in countries worldwide. But the tides have been turning as the general public is waking up to the truth about artificial sweeteners like aspartame and the harm they cause to health. The latest aspartame marketing scheme is a desperate effort to indoctrinate the public into accepting the chemical sweetener as natural and safe, despite evidence to the contrary.

Aspartame was an accidental discovery by James Schlatter, a chemist who had been trying to produce an anti-ulcer pharmaceutical drug for G.D. Searle & Company back in 1965. Upon mixing aspartic acid and phenylalanine, two naturally-occurring amino acids, he discovered that the new compound had a sweet taste. The company merely changed its FDA approval application from drug to food additive and, voila, aspartame was born.

G.D. Searle & Company first patented aspartame in 1970. An internal memo released in the same year urged company executives to work on getting the FDA into the "habit of saying yes" and of encouraging a "subconscious spirit of participation" in getting the chemical approved.

G.D. Searle & Company submitted its first petition to the FDA in 1973 and fought for years to gain FDA approval, submitting its own safety studies that many believed were inadequate and deceptive. Despite numerous objections, including one from its own scientists, the company was able to convince the FDA to approve aspartame for commercial use in a few products in 1974, igniting a blaze of controversy.

In 1976, then FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt wrote a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy expressing concern over the "questionable integrity of the basic safety data submitted for aspartame safety". FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill believed that a grand jury should investigate G.D. Searle & Company for lying about the safety of aspartame in its reports and for concealing evidence proving the chemical is unsafe for consumption.

Despite the myriad of evidence gained over the years showing that aspartame is a dangerous toxin, it has remained on the global market with the exception of a few countries that have banned it. In fact, it continued to gain approval for use in new types of food despite evidence showing that it causes neurological brain damage, cancerous tumors, and endocrine disruption, among other things.

The details of aspartame's history are lengthy, but the point remains that the carcinogen was illegitimately approved as a food additive through heavy-handed prodding by a powerful corporation with its own interests in mind. Practically all drugs and food additives are approved by the FDA not because science shows they are safe but because companies essentially lobby the FDA with monetary payoffs and complete the agency's multi-million dollar approval process.

Changing aspartame's name to something that is "appealing and memorable", in Ajinomoto's own words, may hoodwink some but hopefully most will reject this clever marketing tactic as nothing more than a desperate attempt to preserve the company's multi-billion dollar cash cow. Do not be deceived.

that's such horseshit that they can do that! i am allergic to aspartame but can tolerate some other artificial sweetners (though i try to avoid them all as much as possible). what happens to the people that don't get this info and have a reaction to the it? sucks for them.

Does anyone here remember real sugar? I think they stopped making it in the 80's but that was some good shit.

That shit rots your brain...

drinking soda with aspartame is worse than the regular stuff

GD Searle's CEO at the time when aspartame was approved?

Donald Rumsfeld.

:mad::mad:

the problem (IMO) is people see it as an "all you can drink" soda solution if it is "diet." Ive seen this a lot more and more when i go out to eat. people will order a huge meal and stuff their face, but feel safe that they ordered a diet soda.

For example, lets assume your at the Olive Garden...
12oz of Coke is 144 calories & 39g carbs.
1 bread stick is 150 calories, 28g carbs & 2.5g fat.

So if you were to pass on having a 4th bread stick with your meal, you could just drink a soda with dinner.

Personally for me, I like the taste of diet coke and drink it for that. ive tried coke zero and regular and has a bad after taste for me. Pepsi isnt to bad, but still prefer the taste over diet coke.

I used to drink diet soda like it was my job until I read about Aspartame dangers, now I will only drink it here and there in moderation or with rum :thumbsup

everyone needs to become a diligent label reader...
it's tough, but important
don't be fooled by fancy box covers and marketing hype. There is a lot of information out there...unfortunately, the internet being what it is, a lot of it is bad....but if you do enough research from MULTIPLE sources, it is easier to wade through most of it.

Just stay away from that shit, use normal sugar if u have to, but pls dont use this shit!

thats bullshit. in a study of rats it was proven to cause cancer.

shirley has cooties

stevia is a great natural sweetner that as far as i know doesnt cause cancer...

note: not to be confused with salvia which will make you see jesus.... :2 cents: