Bush, the worst president in history
 

When it is all said and done, Bush will be remembered as the worst president this great country has ever had. And by the way, he will be re elected for a 2nd term, which sais more about the people of this country than it does about Bush.

I ask each and everyone of you good folks to bookmark this post and refer to it in a few years to see if I end up being right or not.

so how bout you blow me?

Yea I agree.
Damn Gore should have ran for 2004.

Its not just Bush, its the people surrounding him.
Rumsfeld , Ashhahahahaha, Chaney ..

They need to go.


As matter of fact, fuck the Republicans. They've never done the world any good anyhow.

as bad as your president-select is, he doesn't compare to some of the losers that were presidents in the 19th century, particularly prior to the civil war.

I don't like blowing men...But I bet that if George w Bush actually posted on GFY, that would be his exact response to my thread as well.

yeah, maybe I should not say "worst president in history"...But definetly the worst president since the 20th century

Well it would be cool if Bush came clean on what he claims to know on Iraq. It's a bit freaky that he is ready to pound some ass without offering up proof. My support is drifting since it seems he is alot of talk and no cold hard facts. Time will tell I guess.

You know who would have been an ideal president, one that all of America could be proud of?

Powell, or John McCain
Those are 2 truelly good men who have the countries best interest in mind. If it was not for Powell btw, we would have already invaded IRAQ. I know most of youguys would like that very much because Bush has said it's a good thing, but Hussein is fucking crazy...

If we invade IRAQ, he will give chemical weapons to alqada, he will torch all the oil fields so we can't use them, and he will kill alot of his own people and a unacceptable amount of U.S. soldiers. You can write that one as well, and see if I am right.

OOOHHHHH RRREEEEAALLLYY!!!!!!!!

Who do you think your customers are? Democrats?? NO!! Becuase DEMOCRATS know how to fuck thier wives, and they know how to get pussy.

Your sales are 99.5% republican. Republicans only fuck their wives for procreation, and even then they only do it missionary. They signup to see "How filthy America has become" so they know what they are fighting against. They sign up (secretly) to jack off, and have a good time. If they get caught they blame it on thier illegal mexican maids.

bring back clinton!!

bush must go in 04

Man... you ever play chess? you ever think we have the proof and are merely stalling until adequate troops/logistics are in place?

left wing numbnuts:1orglaugh

By the way, Do you know how long Saddam has been preparing for a war with the U.S.? Since september 11th. He has everything planned. Yes, the U.S military will easily defeat him, no question about that, but hussein is a sneaky dirt dictator...All men who fit that description do not go down witout a fight...I am afraid He will do something which wich will cost many American lives in the future, and it will eventually be on Bush's hands.

something has to give... pressures building... a world war may occur.... but better now than later:2 cents: while its moderate as oppsoed to out of hand

and not to mention that if he could, Bush would imprision all pornographers on this earth. That is not the main issue here, but I hope you all realise that.

Which is why Vivid put up a decent amount of money and ran a internet awareness campaign against bush in the last election. They knew what was up. Larry Flynt knows whats up too, as he is now voicing alot of concern about what is about to go down with this administration and pornography.

Im not accusing you, but this industry is long over due for a rehaul. If you need to be deceptive in order to sell a product/service well then it sucks! Im so tempted to give prime examples!

Liberals attempting to be serious make for funny reading.

I agree bro, but this is not the American way to do it...
here is the thing, Bush is a tough guy...He wants to put meat into anything he does. He wants to show everyone up....I know that what I am saying is kind of simplifying things, but that is basically his deal, if you simplify it.

Why on earth would Iraq use a nuclear weapon on ANYONE, when they would be nuked to hell themselves? Why on earth would they give a nuke to alqaeda to use, when they know that the U.S. will find out, and would Nuke them to hell? Saddam is a survivalist(sp), he doesnt want to be nuked.

Do you think a truly good man belongs in the US presidency?

Will anyway.
Wouldn't you?
What's a crafty dictator to do in the shadow of the U.S. and U.N. Armed Forces techno-leviathan?

I gotta qualify this though. A full scale war is stupid. We should just throw special forces at this.

Kennedy showed the world pictures of the missiles in Cuba. No doubt it was there. And USA got support from the whole world.

Bush just says HE knows that they have WMD. Thaty should be enough. Did he ever think of taking Cleo's place... He sees what nobody else sees...

I agree with the part about people being deceptive in this industry, but when they come for one, they come for all. You can bet that. One bad apple forces rulles to be put on everyone...So even if its a good thing that these bad apples are exposed, the good apples will be punished as well

yeah, look at how times have changed
Kennedy thought he was gonna be nuked, and had proof of it, and he still showed restraint.

Bush sais(no fucking proof yet, where is the proof?) that Iraq is building a nuke(so they dont even have one yet) and for that reason, we should invade right fucking now, because of a possibility that he will have one in 2 or 3 years.

You use a nuke = you get nuked
Im pretty sure saddam knows that. You really think he will use a nuke, or give one to al qaeda to use?

and if you answer 'yes' to that question, please tell me why saddam has not given biological weapons to alqaeda yet? Proper use of a biological agent can kill as much as a nuke, so why hasent he done that yet?

Gore knew he had no chance against Bush. In times of great conflicts, people will want stability.

Bush will be re-elected, and Gore will run in 08.

WTF?:helpme What kind of fucked up statistics are these?

This situation reminds me how fucked we are. Aren't 'We The People' supposed to be able to do something about this!? This really ISN'T a democracy at all. Our numbnuts President that we DIDN'T elect is needlessly causing havoc around the world and we are collectively sitting on our hands saying 'that's not right.'

This is bullshit man. I'd rather be Canadian and just not have a government instead of being an American and having a government that doesn't listen to me.

So true!

cuz in his realm of business, eastern eurpope seems the most likely and logical conclusion he has.

Sadaam is a dictator : he wants to pile up money ( like Khadafi, IdiAminDada, Romania's Cescasu, etc...). He wants to live like a billionnaire, which he probably is.

If you stop to think about what Sadaam has done to date, before being the agent of the USA in the war against Iran ( after tthe Shah - another millionnaire dictastor), he invaded Koweit to take over a rich country= be richer.

The US intervene to protect their interest, so it ended up being a Iraq-US war. Thats it, nothing more.

Now Bush blames Iraq for everything, without any proof: alquaida, Nuclear weapons, and so on.

North Korea= not important ( no fucking oil , and near China).
Iran ( has nukes) = old enemy that could now be our ally . Why not: the ennemy of my ennemy is my friend... Isn't Riussia today an ally?.

And the USA citizens bekeive all this , coming from a president that his own election is way from being "kosher".

War is going to happen, and the americans are going to live with the shame.

By the way, can anyone tell me why the fuck Everyone refers to Saddam Hussein has "Saddam"?

Do you call your president "George"?
Do you call Tony Blair "Tony"?
Do you call Vladimir Putin "Vladimir"?

Even if your goverment brain-washed most of you into thinking Iraq is "Evil" (I'm not saying they're not, I'm just saying you guys don't need a lotta proof before accusing), you shouldn't call a country leader by his first name, Evil or not.

When the media started calling Hussein "Saddam", it gradually tricked people into thinking they don't have to respect him or his country.

Anyways, I'm not saying Iraq is good or bad. If they plan to attack and they are "Evil", then disarm them, and make sure they don't get any more weapons.

yes, well, I plan ond oing something about it, but It prolly will not make a difference. I don't care though, I would rather get off my ass and take action then sit on my ass like these hypocrytes who would rather just accuse me of being a liberal making trying to be serious

Every person on this board should be ashamed of Bush and a s h c r o f t for this great attack on evey american's civil liberties...I would think pornographers of all people would understand the situation, but I guess alot of these pornographers are just consertive republicans in disguise

Get over the election already. Who would want a president that couldn't even win their home state or the home state of their former boss. If the democrats would have put a half way decent candidate out there, they would have won easily. But they didn't.


"And by the way, he will be re elected for a 2nd term, which sais more about the people of this country than it does about Bush. "


Yes, the american people are morons. It is the only way to explain how bill clinton could have been elected twice. The scary thing is, people would still vote for him.

sinmce when does Bush care about europe? he does not give a damn about europe, which is why no one in europe likes him. I am sure everyone is aware of that

Saddam is insane, and Bush is insane as well, just in another way. Iam sorry, but I am just disgusted by what this guy is gonna do to this country when it is all over and done with.

Dude... I voted for the guy! I am glad he is there, but information is key. I'm not saying show all your cards here at all. I'm just saying that there should be better level of understanding. The American people are either going to support the war financially through their taxes or support it by putting their life on the line. Don't you think we might want to know whats going on? Should we walk into this blind? I don't think so.

I have been a voting Republican for 21 years. This is the first time I have every felt that information was being withheld because someone had there own personal agenda. I could be wrong, but that is the impression this Admin. is leaving with me.

no, in Canada he is called "moron"

I would say bush cares about europe, and specifically eastern europe because it is the last bridge before establishing a truly global economy.

Its all about money.... always has been, always will be. pull politics out and all thats left is the bottom line.

Clinton was a better president then Bush could ever be. Yeah, he liked putting his dicks in girls...So do I...I am sure so do you guys...That was his one fault...Clinton may be a sex addict, but he is smarter then the 2 Bush's put together

which world would you rather live in:
the clinton lef 1990's
or the Bush led 2000's

I second that... Look at the economy while Clinton was there.

And during clinton's 8 years, there wasn't a lot of prosecutions against porn...

yes, I agree...it is all about the money...Why do people continually think that invading Iraq is about nukes? It is all about the money, which should make what Bush is doing a criminal act(you know, trading soldiers lives for oil)

yeah, exactly. Also wasn't coolidge just a front man for a bunch of other creeps???

yeah, so under yor theory a president magically walks into office and makes a great economy suddenly appear.....lollolololololol

LOL Exactly!!

lol, clinton had nothing to fucking do with the economy. You see, there was this thing called the internet that went mainstream. People invested millions and millions of dollars in faulty business plans , mostly with the idea of spending money for market share and hoping to turn a profit later.

The economy was already coming down when clinton is in office. Then it was magically bush's fault. Long term economic cycles dont happen in 6 months.

Same thing with all this enron type stuff. It was all happening when clinton was in office.

Take the blinders off.

You really think I said that?

So under YOUR theory, whoever the president is, the economy is the same...

:helpme

Bill Maher said it best when he said that "iraq" is like saying "i love you" to a girl....No matter what kind of deep shit you are in, you can just say "i love you" to your women, and that will solve most things

Iraq is the same thing...your popularity rating is down...economy is the worst that it has been in 10 years...war in afghanastan coming to a slow stop...no problem, just put the focus on iraq, all will be well.

And when there is no Iraq, well, we will just go after the pornographers. I am sure that will help with my ratings. Or maybe we will nuke cambodia, I heard they grow pot there

Probably???????????

LOL too much truth Meta....though I think it goes far deeper than some president guy

All I'm saying is that I think Clinton was better for the economy.

I'm not saying he was the king of economy, I'm saying he did a better job than Bush. If he was still in office, he'd still do a better job than Bush.

and what kind of 'smart' or frankly 'sane' man wouled ever elect John A s h c r o f t to anything, let alone the department of justice?? That man looks to be the second coming of hitler....

I am glad that 8 years is the maximum a president can serve, because this world will not be able to withstand anymore than 8 years from the Bush administration.

I have nop hard proof.... ask Bush, he will say