I wish this site was mine
 

I had to post this. I shot a girl named Karma for one of my clients. He emailed me and told me that she was so popular on his site that he wanted to start a site of her own. He had me shoot several thousand photos of her over the coarse of a week. I finally got to see what the site looks like tonight. I think it kicks ass! I wish I would have thought of this. Shit!

Anyway, here she is:

http://www.teenkarma.com/

I can proudly say I shot every photo on the site. Too bad I don't get recurring revenue on it. Oh well. Live and learn.

He needs to set up an affiliate program on it in my opinion.

your sig is a fucking HPA.

page not found.

nice to cater to the pedophiles, that girl looks 10. if that.

she does look young

Yep, but Donovan's spams are getting old.

She probably is. I do not see any nudity on the site. I love it when people exploit children like that.

Class act Donovan.

Like I said, the site doesn't belong to me. And the girl is almost 20 years old. I just WISH it belonged to me 'cause it will probably convert like crazy.

i love you aaron :1orglaugh

Ya'all are just jealous, like me. You wish you'd started Karma's site first. I'm sure it'll make a bundle of cash.

:winkwink:

C'mon now.... admit it. :thumbsup

from the site

hahahaha

'I love sitting with my family at a big gathering and thinking "nobody at this table knows what I really do.'

uh, sure.

:glugglug

Nice looking site and I'm sure it will convert like crazy, but that does border on looking too young!

My granny found out when she was visit I left the puter on..
shes 86 and was cleaning my pit! and found out pretty quick.
he.he. she banned me from pancakes for amonth? go figure.
he.he. the girl above seems borderline to me? just out the tranning bra?

Why exactly would anyone be jealous of a borderline pedo site? Sales aren't hurting *that* badly, are they?

Wait a minute, I don't see you guys jumping all over Lightspeed about Tawnee Stone. If she's almost 20 years old, what makes this situation any different to you ? Is it because the post is by "Donovan" instead of "Lightspeed' ?

:)

people jump on them about tawny all the time.

every content provider who does teens has girls that are similar to this girl. in fact in another thread tonight there were a whole bunch of pix posted of 'teens'. So one of them 'appears' to be 15, another one could pass for 16, another one 17.

the only thing i have a problem with is when somebody puts a young looking model into situations which clearly cater to pedophiles. 18 year old teens don't hug teddy bears, don't have bedrooms that are decorated for a 12 year old girl, don't have crayons etc etc

as far as i know none of that is what Tawnee is about. i didn't check out TeenKarma other than the front page.

Yes.

Why don't people just admit to themselves that it is perfectly normal for men to be attracted to teenage girls under 18? I don't think there is anything wrong with places like Club Seventeen who play on the 'just the other side of legal' fantasy. Most teen sites do it to one degree or another, but no one wants to cop to it.

Pedophilia is a pathology in which ones primary sexual orientation is prepubescent children, not some 25 year old guy who thinks a well developed 16 year old is hot.

the design is great... so smooth.. I'm jealous I don't have such ideeas and such HTML knowledges...

http://wedesignxxx.com/fuckoff.jpg

now seriously, is it "made" by your girlfriend too? :1orglaugh

Just checking how many posts i have...... c-ya :Graucho

'She' says she's 18..

umm.....i do :glugglug

On some sites so does Guage and we all know in the porn world she almost qualifies for retirement benefits and a handicapped placard.:winkwink:

But damn this girl "Karma" does look young.

Upon first glance I thought it was one of those non-nude "model" sites.

Yeah it'll convert but I won't promote it.

You haven't seen pics of Tawnee with teddybears (or bunnies), or pony tails in a little girls bedroom ?

Check Karma's Link Page...now check out the ad copy under the evidence eliminator link:
I guess 1 being the photographer that took these pictures...and 2 being the designer who created the site...LOL

actually no i haven't. i've only briefly looked at Tawnee's site.

all the teen sites, content, are all walking a bit of an ethical moral tightrope.

The guy above though had it right though, men, all of us look at hot teenage girls sexually. It doesn't mean anybody is a pedophile. A pedophile gets off on children, pre-pubescents and girls right on the cusp of becoming a woman. Once a girl's secondary sex characteristics are all there, menstruation, breasts, pubic hair - she's biologically an adult. But we as a society have decided that unlike in many other cultures young adults 13-18 aren't ready for sex, especially with an adult. So we've now I think gone overboard, we now look at guys who enjoy looking at a hot 16 year old as a pedophile. No way - that's a normal guy. Even a 30 year old guy who starts a relationship with a hot 16 year old isn't a pedophile, he's an idiot and he can be charged with statuatory rape but he's not a pedophile.

i think any content that takes a young looking legal model and tries to create the impression that she is pre-pubescent or barely pubescent is wrong.

Stuffed animals are sorta hard to make judgements about, if you go to a college dorm, most college girls do bring a stuffed animal or two with them.

Yeah, about that "Links" section:

This is where my very first photosets were published on the Internet. If you like girls like me (who look younger than they are) you should definitely check out ...

You are dead wrong. Tawnee is being made out to look 12. She has Disney toys with her in certain photos. She wears kiddy PJ's and is always holding stuffed animals etc..

She is 18 so its legal, but they are trying to make her appear as young and child like as possible.

Reading for comprehension is a good thing. I already told you a client created this site. It comes from the same people that bring you TeenFlood.com, if you must know.

:)

I don't.

I think people need to stop confusing "innocent" for "young" --- our goal with all our photography is to make our models look innocent and wholesome, no tattoos, no piercings, no high heels, no thongs, no fake tits, and not a lot of makeup.

If you guys think Tawnee looks underage, then all I can say is:

I'm sorry my pornstars don't look used up yet!


Steve Lightspeed

Steve, the dictionary gives this definition for "innocent".

A person, especially a child, who is free of evil or sin.
A simple, guileless, inexperienced, or unsophisticated person.
A very young child.

The key word there is "inexperienced" -- we shoot mostly first time models, and we cater to guys who aren't into girls who take 18 facials, fists in their ass, or piss in their mouth.

We are very careful never to insinuate that any of our girls are underage -- all our sites are clearly labled, and even the names imply 18 and over (university, sorority) -- those terms don't exist in a child's world

Do I think Tawnee Stone looked underage ? Yes. I thought the same with all the spam I get for xxxRaimi site. When I first got one, I actually thought thats what it was.

Some people will feel uncomfortable mixing porn with girls that APPEAR to them to be under the legal age. If the models look underage to a handful of webmasters, you can bet they look underate to a lot of surfers. There's no doubt that you'll get plenty of signups from guys looking for that "underage" appeal of a model or models on a site.

I'm not talking about LightSpeed's sites specifically, but any site that has models that may look underage to the surfer.

This shouldn't be viewed as a moral rant of any kind either, just my observations. Personally, it doesn't bother me as long as it's legal. My presence in this thread was to call out hypocritical views. People here like to throw stones at others if they're not popular or threatening. Then end up overlooking it when someone else who is popular or threatening does the same thing. Whether it be running sites with young looking models, supports spam, questionable meta tags, celeb sites, bestiality, etc.. You know the deal.

Brujah--
I agree with what you are saying.

There is a definite push in most of the "teen sites" to make girls look as young as possible. Stuffed animals disney wallpaper etc. I've seen that stuff on Tawnees site, and other "teen" sites.

Mutt I haven't seen softcore teens that are promoted any differently, matter of fact. I guess the big thing is if they look like that "$$$$$$$$$" teen look (ie they are 20 and look 12).

:2 cents:

This debate always confuses me, mainly cos it's bullshit.

What is the fuck is the difference between a girl who is 17 years 364 days old and a girl who is 18? Zero.

Except the law.

This isn't a moral debate, it's a legal one but people come in here and bag on Lightspeed or Donovan Whothefuckever because they cater to guys who like young girls.

It's the same as blaming guys who run big titty sites for women who have messed up body images.

Get off your moral high horses, because you're full of shit.

A 19 year old girl with diapers on is still 19 and perfectly legal no matter how young they 'make' her look.

again, i've seen many different threads bitching about tawny's 'young' look.

it's the first time i've seen anyone mention this karma site.

so where's the hypocrisy?

Why don't you do your own research? Last I checked, the forum had a search feature. Look it up and see for yourself. If you take the time to look instead of pretending I'm making it up, I will bet that you find people bitching in this very thread about the Karma site, while supporting the Lightspeed sites in other threads.

quiet--

As long as it is legal do your thing, it is hard to debate ethical/moral standards in an industry such as this. Or any competitive industry for that matter.

I didn't like lightspeed's whole tirad on maxhardcore's stuff, just like I don't like folks saying this teenkarma site or tawnee's site is different than any other "softcore teen" site. I guess folks don't see the irony in attacking other's ethics on the way they promote legal content. Other folks will attack you in a different niche. ("teen softcore" v. "mature adult extreme hardcore")

In a way it is like the mp3 stuff (although this is legal) don't use bullshit about about some common ethical system that we all share. Because we don't all share a common ethical system, especially in a competive marketplace.

If it is legal, then it is legal. People will push to the absolute edge.

In that way I agree with jimmy's statement.

Well while she is legal I think these guys are walking a thin line.
While Tawny looks like she could be 16 at the youngest I am more apt to believe 18-19 when I see her, however this girl looks 12 at the youngest in some pics.

No moral high horse here on my part...I'm a staunch believer in first amendment rights and as long as it is legal then you do as you wish.

But I would not want the headache of running such a site because I guarantee you they will be getting a knock on the door from some law enforcement agency at some point and they better hope they are running everything on the up and up and not a single model release is missing :)

dizzam she is young looking

No headaches when you are on the "up and up".

I was thinking the same thing !
:)

Girls who look younger than they are have a right to work, too.

If she appeals to a pedophile, perhaps he'll jack off instead of molesting a child.

Our culture has a wacky way of dealing with peds. Probably a lot of the kids who get killed are killed by peds fearing discovery.

I don't know if I have the answer, but the way we do it certainly isn't the answer. The peds molest the kids, and when the peds are done, our guilt- and shame-oriented culture does the rest. The kids get harmed twice.

Instead of inculcating into the victims the idea that what happened was some sort of mind-bendingly bad thing, we should help them shrug it off with "Sorry that happened, but it's no big deal."

I studied pedophilia quite a bit when I was dating a woman who had been molested (or claimed as much), so I read up on it.

One of the biggest sources of guilt for the kids is that frequently, the kids are not passive victims. They discover that, hey, sex feels good. (I'm not talking about infants here, obviously, but the kids who are a bit older and are capable of a purely physical response.) When the abuse get discovered, they suddenly hear that all this stuff that was happening was HORRIBLY BAD, and when they reflect on the fact that it felt okay to them, they get this feeling of being dispossessed and evil and full of shame.

We need to tell them that what they were doing wasn't wrong, it just wasn't time for it yet, that sex is for older people, not kids, and that what happened happened to them not because of them and that eventually they'll have a good sex life, but that sex is not a healthy thing to do at their stage of life. And that is why the molester was bad, but you (the child) were not bad.

Unfortunately, after molestation is discovered, there's such a climate of hysteria surrounding the abuse that the kid gets traumatized a second time.

Not debating anything with you but next time if you quote me quote me correctly...you ended my quote with a period when there was no period and it continued on to the most important part.

My quote in it's entirety:

With the key part of that quote being at the end...."AND NOT A SINGLE MODEL RELEASE IS MISSING"

Hell anyone can make mistakes I just wouldn't want to be on the end of an investigation into a site like that one and one of those kinds of mistakes occurs. So when they do come a knockin' because someone is going to damn well complain about that site they had better hope every T is crossed and every I is dotted.

Because if not you may be still found innocent in the end, but the financial, emotional, and possibly physical pains you suffer from spending a night in county lock up arrested on possible cp charges could harm you for life.

That is complete and total bullshit.

When the cops come to your door with a search warrant, seize your computers, lap tops, records, checks, etc and then tell you that you'll be hearing from them in six to 12 months after they get around to going through all your shit, you tell me how happy you are being on the up and up.