Did I just witness the most ironic banning ever?
 

Regarding this thread: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=934916

CLIFF NOTES: The OP's post was that you should steal content from the GF sites to start your own instead of sending them traffic.

He suggested you steal from the very sites who steal their content, then Eric, the guy who takes ad money from companies who actually do steal content, bans him and closes the thread, while "Sex In Your City" is skinning GFY, who is owned by Brazzers, who is stealing everyones content for their tube sites!!!

EPIC IRONY!!!!:thumbsup :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Incredible.

That banning was fucking odd but well history wise he had already been walking a razor's edge around here with previous rule breakings and issues.

That assclown was looking for a banning.

must be slow over at the other place.

i agree.. no loss to see him banned, but the reason for it was lame... especially considering the whole skin debacle...

no it was clear, dont you see that one guy there was crying and wanted to bann the op? looks like thats enough to be banned here ...

Stolen content is stolen content. Doesn't matter f it's stolen directly from the original site or 16 times over from those who stole it in the first place. Anybody who suggests you should steal content in any form deserves to get their ass banned.

I keep hearing how ex girlfriend sites steal all their content. I find this strange considering that I have been selling to these types of sites for YEARS. Yeah, I'm sure there are some that do steal...But not all of them do.

The thread was about as fucking lame as the one from a few weeks ago where somebody was saying to link to the tube videos and steal their bandwidth because they steal content.

Steal steal steal...Seems to be the only way a lot of people know how to "do business" these days. :(

Barefootsies does exactly same thing - resells stolen content (stolen celebrities photos and vids)

Why is he not banned then?

guess that loan is outta the question.

epic irony!!!! :Graucho

The most ironic part? "Domain Broker" posted the Area51 So Fucking Banned thread, and that's possibly area51's fake nick:

Of course it was a lame thread, I'm not debating that. It was the irony of the banning that I found odd, considering all the latest skin nonsense, paid for by companies who steal content.

Your next.

I sense another epically ironic banning coming as the result of this thread. :winkwink:

well of course the one question, but just like jon clark... well, nothing like jon clark, but the banning was similar in reasons.

Just needed to happen.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

DWB I have a ton of respect for you. Just thought you should know that.
Not many around here, but you're one of them.
Carry on :thumbsup

Aaron M,

Can you hit me up sometime on ICQ please?

Just a few questions when you ain't busy :)

I think this is how we thin out the surfers on GFY...

DWB, you are always a good read. Carry on.lol

I don't know much about ex girlfriend sites but with respect to tubes, the phrase fighting fire with fire comes to mind here.

Leaving the recent drama aside, it was a very justified ban. :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Learn some English, you uneducated eurotrash retard.

Hold me tight, DWB...

in before the lock

I think you should re-read the original post. I think he is saying that if everyone who supports stealing would be banned. The mods should ban themselves based on the skins they have used on GFY over the last month or so. He wasn't really agreeing or disagreeing with the poster of the theft thread.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What I get from this board is; It's ok to accept money from content thieves, and to be one, just don't talk about it and you're cool.

:thumbsup

Perhaps this will be an opportunity for GFY to up another sub-forum.