How to easily remove bad tubes from google
 

sign it , send it to google. simple.


more HERE

simple removal template
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sworn Statements
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described below as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Signature

Signed on this date of:



LOCATION OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL (where authorized work is located):

http:// mysite.com/some-page.html

LOCATION OF INFRINGING MATERIAL

http:// abadtubesite.com/infringing-page.html

Thumbs up man!
Duke

Just be careful when submitting complaints to Google and be 100% sure the site you are submitting is violating copyright rights because if you are wrong you are the one liable.

so one can assume by next week all bad tubes will be removed from google then right?

if this works... and is effective

lol yeah all but the new ones posted by the informants lol

Us folks that shoot our own content for our own sites have no problem being sure. :)

Google has a DMCA info page (google.com/dmca.html) outlining the steps needed to file a DMCA complaint. In the absence of legal counsel or DMCA experience, this will cover all the basics.

When dealing with any big company on DMCA/abuse issues, it helps tremendously if your follow their format.

Google even asks:
Send in your complaints to Google using their exact template. This will make the work of their employees much easier, increase the likelihood of your complaint succeeding, and should help reduce turn time.

says the guy who claimed that the only way to use his content in a fair use parody

was to not use his content at all

you have to consider all the fair use rights that people have to the content too

I still say that. A "parody" isn't intended to use the actual footage. Yes I know the Hitler one that you always babble on and on and on about. But a real CREATIVE parody shoots it's own footage. Of course since you don't have a creative bone in your pissant body, and have never owned or built or created ANYTHING ever...you wouldn't realize that. You cheap piece of shit freeloading son-of-a-bitch. Now get the fuck out of here dumbass.

says the guy that thinks he creative/innovative because he copies waynes world in porn

http://tsfiles.files.wordpress.com/2...ttle-black.jpg


btw i never said anything about creative i said it was fair use

i agree with you parody which use other peoples footage are not truely creative, it a derived work at best, but it is still protected fair use.

It no more creative then say wow waynes world did a comedic product placement




i am a genius for doing the exact same thing in porn

real creativity is doing something that no one else has done before but it doesn't change the fact that your are legally obligated to respect that fair use when you send out your takedown notices.

Not really. There is nothing new under the sun. Or as the Beatles sang: "There's nothing you can do that can't be done"

Creativity is taking something and making it your own to where it comes out unique. Like when the Rolling Stones started out they were trying to copy Muddy Waters, but being young English guys it came out "wrong" and became their style.

Nobody re-invents the wheel. But creative people can build on the things that came before, put a new twist on it and imprint their own style and make something of it.

Now as far as parody goes...yeah you can take somebody elses footage and change the words. And that Hitler shit that was done about the GFY fiasco was pretty damn funny! :1orglaugh And definitely creative too.

But as a guy who has spent his whole life in the entertainment business...I consider a real parody to be something you made yourself. Like Weird Al. I guess it's a thin line.

But you still have no business here. You do make me laugh though.

that just a justification of a copycat

there is a huge difference between building on something came before and taking it in a whole new direction.

while many people painted in that style before and after Michelangelo
No one did what Michelangelo because he created a special rigging so he could paint that ceiling while the church was still open.

Every other painter had to close the church down for years to accomplish the task

that is miles away from wayne's world did so i will do the exact same thing in porn.

if anything it way closer to what was done with that "hitler parody" (i would say that downfall parody is actually more creative-- well at least the first one)



so one second using other peoples footage is not creative, but when somone for GFY does it with someone elses content it is.

make up your fucking mind, o wait i guess that the point, if it your content the rules are totally different.

Thank god your not in charge of defining what is and is not the legitimate fair use of parody.

I can only laugh at your "interpretations" of what I say. You truly are a complete idiot. Now get off the internet. Your parents are gonna put you on restrictions again.

so the 37 copy of someone elses idea is creative.

but taking a porno of your saggy wife and layering in parody soundtrack of snows "legal"
(legal tender and fine becomes legal saggy and old) to protest the stupidity of 2257 requirements for clearly over age content is not.


copying wayne's world comic product placement is creative (when you finally realized i would work)

but telling you that product placement will work in porn when everyone (including you) says it impossible to work is not


out of all the downfall parodies there are only two creative ones

the very first one (becuase it change the direction from a serious movie to a comic parody)

and the eff one (from a parody, to a takedown trap that proved the media company was falsely certifying that it was an infringement)

like "micheal angelo" or the rolling stones even though they based it on something else they created something new, they were just not the next copy of same basic idea.

lol

My saggy tit wifes videos are just copies from the first caveman who ever picked up a piece of charcoal and drew two neanderthals fucking on the side of a cave. None of us invent anything new. Creativity is a concept that you don't understand...or at least from the insanity that you post on GFY you don't seem to grasp it.

Carry on with your trolling fool.

THIS is exactly why I tried to tell Eric to SHUT THIS SECTION DOWN EXCEPT FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN PROVE TO THE MODS THAT THEY ARE IN THIS BUSINESS.

And gideongallery posting in this section at all is a complete and utter abomination. And it's the reason that this section...like every other section of GFY these days, is only good for mild entertainment purposes. And not fulfilling any usefulness to the industry as a whole.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
it amazing how far you got try and justify the idiotic statement that copying waynes world in porn is somehow creative

in your world micheal angelo didn't invent a new type of scaffolding so that he could paint the roof of the chapel without closing it down.

i am a computer programmer, and as such know the difference between your made up definition of creativity and real creativity.

HTTP, html, tcp/ip, xml, silverlight, NAS, Bit torrent, and hundreds of other technology were creatively built from the simple 1 0 of binary.

they all did something new, something that was not done before. something that was creative.


you mean like advicing people they can blindly ignore all the fair uses you don't consider to be valid even though the court have already established that they are valid.


btw what really funny is that you keep trying arguing that taking someone elses idea (wayne's world )and applying it exactly to porn is some how more creative,

then taking a video and changing it entire meaning via a custom subtitles or soundtrack.

btw

"There's nothing you can do that can't be done"

the statement is not a true statement

want proof

be the first person to run the 4 minute mile

someone did that, and no one else can do it, being first doing something different then everyone else in the world could do, that is the only place of true creativity.

Everyone else is copycatting losers.

Guys I have sell content for years and created hundreds of site but what I do went I see a simple shity website using one of my sets they even posted completed with even my logo on it.

nice things :thumbsup

Here's one for you GOOGLE:

Just put your lips together and BLOW

if you want to get illegal content off a site first contact the webmaster if that doesnt work submit a DMCA complaint works everytime

Sorry, but it does not work every time. We never send notices to webmasters (unless agreements have been made) because 99% of them don't do shit. Go straight to the host's registered agent.

Glad I read this, I wonder does this work in general? Its so much stuff stolen off my site it's crazy and it seems there is nothing I can do about it

I did not know that google would do this.

ROFL.. no seriously i lol'ed.. They can file a notice of defence if they wish to fight it.
You can dmca whole forums force takedowns if you had the time

The abuse of the dmca can go both ways.. You can just say you made a mistake as long as some of your content is on the site it would never get past discovery

now thiefs well they just go back into the hole..