Man Sues Over Genital Amputation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brassmonkey
    Pay It Forward
    • Sep 2005
    • 77390

    #1

    Man Sues Over Genital Amputation



    LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) - A Kentucky man who claims his penis was removed without his consent during what was supposed to be a circumcision has sued the doctor who performed the surgery.
    pic of Genital Amputation

    Phillip Seaton, 61, and his wife are seeking unspecified compensation from Dr. John M. Patterson and the medical practice that performed the circumcision for "loss of service, love and affection." The Seatons also are seeking unspecified punitive damages from Patterson and the medical practice, Commonwealth Urology.

    A woman who answered the phone at Commonwealth Urology would not take a message for the doctor Thursday. But the Seaton's attorney said the doctor's post-surgical notes show the doctor thought he detected cancer and removed the penis. Attorney Kevin George said a later test did detect cancer.
    TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
    DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com
  • Spunky
    I need a beer
    • Jun 2002
    • 133978

    #2
    I'd rather be dead if I didn't have the big balboski

    Comment

    • sicone
      Retired
      • Jan 2004
      • 18453

      #3
      why is 61 yr old getting circumcised?

      fucked off in any case tho

      Comment

      • brassmonkey
        Pay It Forward
        • Sep 2005
        • 77390

        #4
        Originally posted by sicone
        why is 61 yr old getting circumcised?

        fucked off in any case tho
        im thinking the wife
        TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
        DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

        Comment

        • Iron Fist
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2006
          • 23400

          #5
          He can still get it up looking at that old wrinkled pancake? Well, I guess we will never know now huh...
          i like waffles

          Comment

          • gecko
            ******
            • Jun 2002
            • 21846

            #6
            Damn that has to suck
            [email protected]

            Comment

            • cosis
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2001
              • 5292

              #7
              only in Kentucky

              Comment

              • baddog
                So Fucking Banned
                • Apr 2001
                • 107089

                #8
                As well he should.

                Comment

                • kaori
                  Confirmed User
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 1569

                  #9
                  "thought" he detected cancer??
                  Sounds like they should have just done the circumcision, and then a lot more tests before amputation!

                  Comment

                  • TidalWave
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 2706

                    #10
                    Attorney Kevin George said a later test did detect cancer.

                    But I would still like to have been woken up and asked first ... a few hours won't make a difference.
                    www.SwiftNode.com

                    Comment

                    • tiger
                      Confirmed User
                      • Apr 2002
                      • 6986

                      #11
                      Why the fuck would anyone get circumcised much less a 61 year old man?

                      Comment

                      • Davy
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2006
                        • 4323

                        #12
                        I'd rip peoples heads off if that happened to me.
                        ---
                        ICQ 14-76-98 <-- I don't use this at all

                        Comment

                        • L-Pink
                          working on my tan
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 39151

                          #13
                          Originally posted by sicone
                          why is 61 yr old getting circumcised?

                          fucked off in any case tho
                          Tired of the ant-eater look.

                          Comment

                          • brassmonkey
                            Pay It Forward
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 77390

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Davy
                            I'd rip peoples heads off if that happened to me.
                            hahaha
                            TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
                            DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

                            Comment

                            • cam_girls
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 2968

                              #15
                              I'll donate a few inches. Reminds me of the chinese VD joke, chinese doctor says
                              "no you don't have to amputate, dick will fall off all by itself in 2 weeks"

                              Comment

                              • k0nr4d
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2006
                                • 9231

                                #16
                                That man can't possibly sue them for ENOUGH.
                                Mechanical Bunny Media
                                Mechbunny Tube Script | Mechbunny Webcam Aggregator Script | Custom Web Development

                                Comment

                                • IllTestYourGirls
                                  Ah My Balls
                                  • Feb 2007
                                  • 14311

                                  #17
                                  Tort Reform NOW! hahahahaha

                                  Comment

                                  • CaptainHowdy
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Dec 2004
                                    • 94081

                                    #18
                                    I wouldn't mind that...

                                    Comment

                                    • PlugRush Sascha
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jan 2004
                                      • 2772

                                      #19
                                      That is completely fucked up.
                                      Plugrush - Push ads, native ads, banners & pops. Buy & sell adult and mainstream traffic.

                                      Skype plugrushsascha

                                      Comment

                                      • area51 - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Aug 2009
                                        • 3163

                                        #20
                                        Why does he even need a dick at 61

                                        Comment

                                        • brassmonkey
                                          Pay It Forward
                                          • Sep 2005
                                          • 77390

                                          #21
                                          is he considered the second lady of the house
                                          TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
                                          DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

                                          Comment

                                          • Libertine
                                            sex dwarf
                                            • May 2002
                                            • 17860

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by sicone
                                            why is 61 yr old getting circumcised?
                                            Considering his age the most likely reason was balanitis. Chances are the man in question was overweight, had diabetes type 2, and waited too long before visiting a physician. By the time he finally did visit a physician it was too late to resolve the issue without surgery.

                                            It was not a routine circumcision, since they'd probably have used local instead of full anesthesia for that and possible cancer would have gone unnoticed with a simple procedure like that.

                                            So the patient's dick was almost certainly an inflamed, infected mess, the patient himself wasn't in great health, the surgeon was performing a non-standard circumcision and there probably was a suspicion that more might be wrong. When he did find something, it almost certainly wasn't something small that could have been removed by less drastic means.

                                            Of course, the surgeon still should have informed the patient and gotten his consent before the amputation. Not for medical reasons (it's quite possible that he saved the patient's life), but to cover his own ass.
                                            /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                                            Comment

                                            • eroticsexxx
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2006
                                              • 3133

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Libertine
                                              So the patient's dick was almost certainly an inflamed, infected mess, the patient himself wasn't in great health, the surgeon was performing a non-standard circumcision and there probably was a suspicion that more might be wrong. When he did find something, it almost certainly wasn't something small that could have been removed by less drastic means.
                                              The most likely scenario might have been that decayed tissue may have been found once the surgeon began performing the procedure.

                                              Instead of leaving the damaged tissue exposed, the doctor then made the decision to amputate the diseased organ to save time and to prevent further spread of the infection (which would have been exacerbated by the removal of the foreskin).

                                              The case will not go very far once the doctor presents his finding to a medical tribunal and they back his decision.

                                              Comment

                                              • Libertine
                                                sex dwarf
                                                • May 2002
                                                • 17860

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by eroticsexxx
                                                The most likely scenario might have been that decayed tissue may have been found once the surgeon began performing the procedure.

                                                Instead of leaving the damaged tissue exposed, the doctor then made the decision to amputate the diseased organ to save time and to prevent further spread of the infection (which would have been exacerbated by the removal of the foreskin).

                                                The case will not go very far once the doctor presents his finding to a medical tribunal and they back his decision.
                                                Or maybe it was squamous cell carcinoma which at first was thought to be lesions caused by severe but standard balanitis. During surgery, the physician may have found subcutaneous lesions which convinced him that the only course of action was excision.

                                                Either way, I think we can safely say that the media once again managed to turn what may well have been a sound medical decision into a medical horror story.

                                                And for those who say "but nothing warrants cutting off a dick!":


                                                Squamous cell carcinoma of the foot, now imagine having that below the skin on your dick.


                                                DO NOT LOOK IF YOU ARE SQUEAMISH




























                                                /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                                                Comment

                                                • Libertine
                                                  sex dwarf
                                                  • May 2002
                                                  • 17860

                                                  #25
                                                  A note to those who just lost their lunch: it could be worse. I could have posted a picture of the same thing on a penis, instead.
                                                  /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                                                  Comment

                                                  • eroticsexxx
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Aug 2006
                                                    • 3133

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Libertine
                                                    Or maybe it was squamous cell carcinoma which at first was thought to be lesions caused by severe but standard balanitis. During surgery, the physician may have found subcutaneous lesions which convinced him that the only course of action was excision.
                                                    Indeed...

                                                    Comment

                                                    • VeriSexy
                                                      Join The Royal Family
                                                      • Apr 2002
                                                      • 25463

                                                      #27
                                                      sucks to be him
                                                      Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
                                                      Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos
                                                      .
                                                      With TOP RATIO Sites like


                                                      ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com |
                                                      TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com


                                                      Comment

                                                      Working...