![]() |
Linux or FREEBSD for hosting? and why
Linux or FREEBSD for hosting? and why
What do you use? |
linux, because it is easy to maintain
|
FreeBSD all the way :thumbsup
|
For web hosting there's probably not that much difference, make the choice based on who is going to be looking after the server...
|
yeah thats great
|
Quote:
I wanted to hear your answers and compare it with theirs |
Linux cent os 5,beacuse it easiest.People promote freebsd beacuse of it's security,but freebsd doesn't have thing anything special when it comes to security except many disabled features which sometimes make it hard to manage it.So if you want linux with security of freebsd,you just need to harden system with things like bastila and grsecurity plus firewall,mod security and many other things.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, what email server are you planning to run? |
Quote:
The email will be on my local MS exchange server here in denmark, just need a smtp relay on the server |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wont go in to details about the setup for obvious reasons. The mail lands on MX A (smtp) and relays it to MX B wich is my exchange server. MX B Only accept incomming traffic from MX A. That keeps the ddos attacks and scriptkiddies away. I love to far out in the country to get anything bigger then a 5/5mbit connection. A larger ddos attack would block access to the Cisco VPS consentrator and customer support That is why I dont have email or webtraffic go straight to the server. The outlook webaccess aitn even hosted locally either. Its just the frontend on a remote server When sending email from my Outlook or outlook-webaccess, it is send out by MX B (domain.local) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i always liked linux over freebsd..
|
Others have said it best, go with whatever the folks maintaining the server are most familiar with with. In the end, there isn't a lot of difference performance wise and such, if ran by competent sys-admins.
I prefer Linux, simply because I *know* linux. If anything happens on Linux, there is a good chance I can recovery/fix it. FreeBSD however, I only know the basics. If ran by competent folks, you will have a good experience with either. -Phil |
freebsd always
|
freebsd 7.x
|
FreeBSD is my preferred choice. the ports system is pure bliss. its also true UNIX and I find there is much more consistant documentation. Some of the highest uptimes (3-4 yrs) are systems running BSD.
|
Quote:
|
Thank you very much for all the honest feedback.
I conclude there is no big diff in limits, so I will use whatever they reccomend. thx |
Quote:
|
i don't have the why for you but over the years my techs have told me freebsd is the most secure... shrug
|
I prefer FreeBSD, just because I've been using it for over 10 years and am used to it.
|
Even though I said earlier it doesn't matter, I may as well put in my +1 for FreeBSD. Been using it since 1996
|
I run OpenBSD, but I'd pick FreeBSD over linux.
|
Personally fond of CentOS.
|
vote for *BSD
|
Solaris 10, because it blows Linux and BSD.
Otherwise, just Linux. |
Quote:
|
We let customers pick the OS, we normally work with FreeBSD however.
If managed, setup and configurated correctly both linux and unix (freebsd) are a stable and good choice. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123