Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped
 

i love the site, but the latest fhg seem too over photoshoped.

what do you think?

samples:

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...185250/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...235649/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...713575/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...818175/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...722408/1794391

Not really

Females outside the UK just look that good

looks like met art people are finaly taking this site down with blured shit :)

I've always thought Erro's images looked a bit oversharpened.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

btw, not too photoshopped, as a matter of fact it's on the lower side of nowadays ridiculous photoshopping. I've seen girls without nipples, without bellybutton, girls that look like was statues (just go to most TGP nowadays and you'll see it). This looks more like really good photography and some color correction and minor tweaking. In the first photo I saw you'd even see the net of veins in the girl's leg

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...d/185250/1.jpg

as we are at it: why is that there's not a single site with over-photoshopping that ever succeeded, yet people still continues doing it? It really amazes me :helpme

Great stuff, but yes, way over photoshopped.

i thought so.

top pics spoilt with silly photoshop.

I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!

I will, however, sit down and rub one out.

he he

me too

i just know they were paying shitty low money to the girls

Question is, do people sign up from it? If they do, it's not over-Photoshopped.

Digital artist here ---

I don't think so at all. It's obvious they're photoshopped to me, because I know girls' skin just ain't that perfect -- but most people wouldn't think that. They'd buy it, because it's good, subtle photoshop work.

Overphotshopped is what the chick magazines do on their covers(Cosmo, bazaar, etc). They trim waistlines and make the skin look plastic.

Erotica-archives skin tones look right.

to me they look almost cartoon like rather than real pics.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... I mean, some people go for 3D porn and/or Anime... Do I find that a turn on, not at all... but some people do...

Errotica-Archives, to me, is about erotic nudes in exotic locales. Its goal isn't to appear realistic, leave that for reality sites. Instead I see the goal as fulfilling a fantasy and fantasy doesn't have to be realistic.

A more interesting question to me would be...

In today's adult entertainment world with reality and realism soooo popular, does Errotica-Archives miss out on attracting a large percentage of users because they veer so far away from the some of todays hottest niches?

However everything is cyclic, 80s fashion is coming back in right after retro 70s is fading out. 5 years from now the masses may have tired of the reality niche and may be swinging back into the fantasy realm in which case they'd be poised to dominate the market :P

It is way too over photoshopped. The people that chime in here saying it is fine and creates the fantasy etc are missing the point. A picture can be TOTALLY photoshopped and still have that amazing glamour appearance. Once it looks like a plastic doll it has gone way too far.

I shoot a lot of mainstream and we spend up to 10-12 hours on a single image all the time. But you can't tell by looking at it that is is retouched. All the detail is still there. you can even see pores. But it is very clean.

Here is a sample. Not the best pic in the world, but it illustrates my point ..

http://www.jayscans.com/image/gfy/kylie4.jpg

:2 cents:

I use photoshop for tat removal, if possible, and to smooth out skin blemishes or other unwanted artifacts. However, to enlarge breast, hips or whatever is when things get silly.