![]() |
Digg announces NOFOLLOW links for submissions
http://blog.digg.com/?p=864
We?ve made a few changes to the way Digg links to external sites that may impact some folks in the SEO community. These changes reduce the incentive to post spammy content (or link spam) to Digg, while still flowing ?search engine juice? freely to quality content. We?ve added rel=?nofollow? to any external link that we?re not sure we can vouch for. This includes all external links from comments, user profiles and story pages below a certain threshold of popularity.My comment: Big impact on those using digg to get indexed quickly. As for SEO value, getting the link's no follow tag removed depends on the popularity of your content. Popularity = 'real content' Unpopular content = spam. I'm not sure the distinction is that black and white. :winkwink: |
Did NoFollow fuck up the web? Here's Matt Cutts on NoFollow links
|
Seems like a good move for them.
|
Huge impact
|
This will annoy the ones spamming for link-juice for sure.
|
This will stop a lot of the spam, not any time soon though.
|
hmmmm ....
|
Does anyone know if GFY use the nofollow too?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That said, sig links seem to (I suspect-I am not sure) carry less weight than in content/in post links. Let me know if you know otherwise. |
I'm surprised all the big 2.0 properties haven't dropped the nofollow bomb. seems like an obvious way to cut back on the superspammy backlink spam...
|
More and more sites will make this the default...
|
Quote:
|
The more sites do it, the less important nofollow will become. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123