![]() |
If PR matters....
www.pornhub.com is #1 in google for "porn" and PR0.. I don't understand, if PR is important.. then why is a PR0 #1 ? ?
|
its actually a pr5
|
Quote:
I see.. http://www.smartpagerank.com/result....ww.pornhub.com This fucking thing must be broken. I notice that it doesn't show reports from a pile of data centers like it use to I was thinking that maybe it was because of the sesining or seasoning ... being so old and all Adult sites just don't go above PR5 except for extreme exceptions, right? |
Pornhub is #1 because if their BLACKHAT SEO campaing... but the thing is Google do nothing against them!
|
smokey where is a page rank checker that actually shows valid page rank?
|
Quote:
|
Try google toolbar, I think they get it from the source :)
|
Quote:
But again, Black Hat don't mean it won't last. It all depends what practices and barriers are set in place. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All of the PR checkers I have been to are putting it at a PR0
Where can I find a good pagerank checker??? |
All of the PR checkers I have been to are putting it at a PR0
Where can I find a good pagerank checker??? This one at least says it's a PR3 http://oyoy.eu/google/pr/?url=http%3...r-tool.html&#r DC: 64.233.161.18 Marlfield-Farm PR: 3 0 DC: 64.233.167.184 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 53 DC: 364.233.169.133 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 1 DC: 64.233.161.184 (no name yet) PR: 3 23 DC: 64.233.163.189 (no name yet) PR: 3 37 DC: 64.233.171.18 white-snow PR: ? (Retry) 54 DC: 64.233.179.19 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 73 DC: 64.233.183.17 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 90 Working ... 108 DC: 64.233.187.19 Xanadu PR: ? (Retry) 124 Working ... 139 DC: 66.102.1.44 (no name yet) PR: 3 149 DC: 66.102.7.18 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 161 DC: 66.102.9.18 (no name yet) PR: 3 181 DC: 66.102.11.99 (no name yet) PR: 3 196 DC: 66.249.81.18 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 202 DC: 66.249.83.19 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 219 Working ... 234 DC: 66.249.89.19 Mikey PR: 3 246 DC: 66.249.91.18 (no name yet) PR: ? (Retry) 258 |
Quote:
|
they've been a pr5 for a long time now.
|
|
Mr Maxwell, download the google toolbar. Install if on a browser you dont use often, or right on your main one, either way, it will give you current rank.
|
Pagerank Results for: http://pornhub.com
# Data Center Pagerank 1 209.85.225.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 2 209.85.229.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 3 64.233.161.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 4 64.233.161.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 5 64.233.169.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 6 64.233.169.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 7 66.102.1.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 8 66.102.1.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 9 66.102.1.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 10 66.102.9.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 11 72.14.203.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 12 72.14.213.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 13 74.125.113.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 14 74.125.153.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 15 74.125.155.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 16 74.125.157.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 17 74.125.159.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 18 74.125.159.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 19 74.125.159.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 20 74.125.19.104 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 21 74.125.19.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 22 74.125.47.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 23 74.125.53.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 24 74.125.65.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 25 74.125.67.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 26 74.125.67.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 27 74.125.79.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 28 74.125.87.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 29 74.125.91.147 5 / 10 [5 / 10] 30 74.125.93.99 5 / 10 [5 / 10] How come all of the other ones called it PR0 and some call it a PR3? Are there rogue datacenters fucking off lying to us, or what? |
Quote:
|
Google toolbar has it at 5...
http://www.domainpagerank.com/ says... Results: Google PageRank for pornhub.com 0 PageRank validation for pornhub.com http://www.pornhub.com: 302 http://pornhub.com: 302 This site's PageRank may be fake. |
|
I got the google toolbar and I hate it and it wants to phone home..
This would be fucking perfect if it worked with newer firefox.. anyone know if anyone made anything similar? With the PR in the bottom right of the status bar? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2007 |
Here we go.. this is it
Look at this, it's great http://pizzaseo.com/firefox-pagerank Is this what you were talking about, dave? |
Are PRs for the site.com and www.site.com sometimes different?
|
Quote:
|
Just did a quick one of these..
link:http://www dot pornhub dot com They have an ass load of backlinks. A very big ass load. The result you get from that doesn't even do it justice. That goes about 44 pages deep. They probably have double or triple that amount. That's one of the reasons they're #1. Also, they probably have a very low bounce rate. That doesn't hurt either. |
Why are you making a fuss dont you look at alexa website they got like 1,300 back links and redtube has over 3,000 backlinks . They maybe also doing something shady as well but that should do em for a pr5 and porn hub is like 8-9 years old.:2 cents:
|
yes they were insanely aggressive link building for that site. people can bitch but they sinply just out worked the competition.
Quote:
|
Quote:
:Oh crap |
Quote:
|
Unfortunately she's an old fashion girl that google, she needs to see some love before she fucks you.
|
it has a PR5 for a long time... check Google toolbar.
|
the stupidity in this thread is unbelievable.
anything not "organic" by google's terms is blackhat.... |
age, backlinks, frequency of updates, unfortunately they deserve it.
|
I see it as a 5 as welll.
|
www.bigtits.com is PR7 but nowhere in google
go figure. that "seo guru" who was doing the optimization for them, fucked it up royally |
this thread is a prime example of how dumb this industry is.
They've been a pr5 for a long time. PR matters a lot. people misunderstand completely WHY it matters. their sites do well because someone is out there hustling back links day in and day out. he does it on forums, he does it by icq, he's relentless and he doesn't stop. buying links, trading links well etc. thats why a few tube sites are on top for almost every relevant phrase (keez, pornhub, tube8 et al). same people. same guy. same tactics. there is nothing "black hat" about it. very simple methods exercised with fanatical consistency over a period of time. in the meantime, in 2009 ... 98% of this industry is totally baffled by SEO 101. what a fucking joke. |
there is no such thing as "irrelevant backlinks."
Quote:
|
Everything about SEO:
number of one way links |
Quote:
|
considering the success of their link building campaign do you really think google considers those links "irrelevant?"
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123