Bad idea to mask ccbill link codes?
 

I use a script to mask really long links and the ccbill links are getting hits on my end but when i check my stats on ccbill i see nothin. Wtf. Anyone else experience this with ccbill? Or is it just a bad idea to mask ccbill links?

Maybe the stats are running behind OR your masking script isn't working properly.

Without looking I would say if we are not counting the clicks there is probably something wrong with the code. We would be happy to take a look...

phone: 800-510-2859
email: clientsupport at ccbill.com
icq: 461976098

I though that could be possible but i see clicks in other programs

ok ill try you on icq

pls let us know if there was something wrong with that tech

surfers might be hitting back if the link code is taking a moment too long and they see it is taking them offsite

I've been doing this since 2003 or 4 and I've never seen a problem with ccbill links like this one http://www.silentbucks.com/links/Apple-Cash/

..whenever i do a non ccbill link like this i check stats to make sure the hits are being counted right though

Will you post screen caps of it if there was?

I've noticed the links are kind of long. Is there a suitable way to edit them?

went back and checked it out tried a few things with tech support decided to just use the regular ccbill link till im 100% sure its working the right way, it more than likely a software issue on my side. :disgust

i have no idea what possibly could be wrong

their code just sets a cookie by which joins are tracked. it's very simple and fast operation, which just could not simply go wrong

could there be a situation where clicks are tracked but joins aren't? then your shell should somehow clear cookie on surfer's machine.

just some of my thoughts