the latest gem from creationists
 

evolution is complete shit - just check your peanut butter for proof!



:Oh crap:helpme

wow I feel dumber now.. I want my 2 mins back damnit :disgust

Is this the same guy who used a banana to explain how god must exist, because its the perfect fruit?

Makes my fucking head hurt.

:1orglaugh probably!

Behold the peanut butter proof!

It's simply irrefutable.

Conclusion - cousins shouldn't marry.

omg :) :) :)

Conclusion - BROTHER AND SISTER married and that fool is the off spring.

AMEN:thumbsup

lol good find

It's an over simple argument, but evolution is a dumb theory. Sure we evolved but the universe knew what it was making and guided every step. It doesn't matter how many billion years you wait random chemical processes won't make crap yet alone billions of interacting cells in a human body, 30 megabytes of DNA, and dozens of complex organs all required for quality of life.

How did birds get to fly? One day some animal was born with mutant growths under its arms? So it was slightly better at gliding and more prone to pass on it's genes? They got bigger and bigger and one day, look ma I'm fliying. Random mutations that make you better at fucking and voila - wings.

well, they got a point

how come we don't find new life from all kids of shit?

That is too funny. He has done a billion experiments a year for 100-years (2.7 million experiments a day!!!!).

Creationist always fail (epically) to factor time into the evolutionary equation. 100-years is such a small measurement of time in evolution, it cannot even be registered.

Evolution is simply time, chance, and selection. Creationism is thinking a wizard created the world!

Yea, that was a really dumb video.

Had to look up the banana one, its a different guy.



Oh btw, thats retard boy Kirk Cameron beside him.

wow.........

I guess the concept of microscopic slipped past him.

Surly you can explain which part of evolution is a theory...


And with birds and your other questions of life... We have proof in fossil records that birds mutated over millions of years. Along with humans....

time is not ignored, it just not assumed to be infinite.

evolution only keep pointing to proof that has an intelligent design (expriments in a lab) as proof that evolution and all intelligent design theories are absolutely wrong.

if you were to leave the chemicals in seperate vials how much time would you need to go by before life spontaniously grew in the empty petre dish.

we have created more technological advancements by questioning assumptions then by accepting them blindly.

the electon microscope was created because we questioned the theory that atom was the smallest particle of matter.

it is theoretically possible that GOD is the scientist who looks back thru time to the big bang to actually prove that GOD does not exist. (assuming there are only 4d of space time a possibility of Einstein's duality of time theory which is pretty much being ignored)

Quantum mechanics is way more complicated in an assumed 10d space time. There is far more to deal with, and a lot of potential practical applications are decades, if not centuries away from being developed because of that.

I personally would like to see the experiments funded, instead of both sides simply calling the other idiots.

Holy shit

woooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

This thread has dropped my IQ to a very dangerious level.

I'm gonna have to watch a season of "blues clues" to bring it up to a safer level.

Creationists make me laugh.

Wonder if they left the peanut butter open for 1,000,000,000 years their might be new life from it.

I do not think you can consider 100-years to be infinite. 100-years is 100-years. That is 4 human generations -- and from an evolutionary point of view, four generations is nothing. You might see evolutionary change over 1,000 generations, but only if selection and chance combine with time.

Many creationists would be well served to read some books dealing with evolution, such as Making of the Fittest, or Climbing Mount Improbable to have a better understanding of the time and chance involved in the selection process.

I want some peanut butter.

As a result of watching that video, I have accepted Jesus Christ as my lord and savior. How could we have had it all so wrong.

:321GFY

What a backwoods tool.

And for the record, back in college, when I introduced a loaf of bread to a few months of heat by not realizing it had fallen under my dorm room bed, new forms of life DID appear inside that bag. And believe me, I was very careful not to break that bag once I discovered it. Bread soup, anyone?

I knew I would flush out at least one creationist whack job.

The problem is you can't prove something that is invisible doesn't exist. We can't prove something that isn't there ISN'T there.

Invisible Pink Unicorn.

I'll stick with evolution.

The pink unicorns are all yours.

OK, in 200 words or less, explain how random genetic mutations created the eye!
Or you just believe evolution because it's what you've been told?

BTW I know evolution is real I just don't believe all the modifications are random.

Evolution isn't random, it's adaptive. That's why you have animals such as the mole and deep cave and sea-dwelling animals that are eyeless -- where they live, you don't NEED eyes.

What is so glorious about the eye? If god was so great in designing eyes why do some people need glasses or can't see color?

Evolution is blasphemy! Repent before the Lord and Savior and you shall be saved from your sins!

Holy shit! I just opened a new jar of peanut butter and sure enough... ALIENS!

Click here for more important info...

http://www.Slidism.org

This clip proves there is life after peanut butter, and it even involves a banana!...



https://youtube.com/watch?v=Nruh8TdHDyE

It is just like plying the lottery. A genetic mutation is a lottery ticket. Most genetic mutations do not work out, over thousands of generations they appear again and again and do nothing to increase the reproductive successes for the organism they occur in. But some members of a species have winning lottery tickets in the genetic mutations, and these increase their reproductive successes, and they pass that genetic advantage on to their offspring. Over the course of thousands of generations -- that small genetic mutation gives them a slight advantage in reproduction and that genetic mutation becomes prevalent in the species and those without are overcome by those who do. In the case of the eye, it was most likely a genetic mutation that formed a patch of pigment on the surface of the organism which had nerves attached to them. This genetic mutation gave those that had it an upper hand, and that mutation was the winning lottery ticket. Future generations of that species would under go countless other mutations - most of which would not work out, but those with a mutation that started forming a very primitive eye again got he upper hand, etc. etc. etc. (all of this taking place over the course of countless millions of years).

It is all down to chance, time, and selection.

http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb...4-C3F00EE8.jpg

All arguments aside I think we can all agree on one thing in this thread

Peanut butter is God-given. :D

stop this blasphemy!

Ok neat diagram. Regardless of the number of generations, it's still fantastic to believe the great complexity of the human body just made itself.

Evolution is a simple theory that only requires Newtonian mechanics. The frontier theories of quantum mechanics tell us that particles react with each other over great distances, perhaps we are all united! And that possible futures exist that affect the present, perhaps a deity could see human's final design? Einstein suggested time was a dimension in a 4D universe we flow through, why not look ahead?

Looking at samples of evolution in progress and concluding "ah that's how it works" is overuse of Occam's razor, the simple solution is not always the right solution.

Deal with it. It's because we're not evolved to innately understand the complexity involved. We're evolved to deal with throwing spears, not quantum mechanics, which is why it's such a mind fuck.

This statement makes no sense. A hammer is a simple instrument but it still does it's job on the nail. What you're saying is "A hammer is too simple - it only requires newtonian physics, what about multi-dimensional string theory??? Maybe we could look into putting superheated dark matter in a worm hole 500 thousand years in the future to collide with the nail" ie. retarded.

You see a hammer hitting the nail, I see someone holding the hammer :)