GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What About This Girl? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=91652)

PerfectionGirls 12-03-2002 09:42 AM

What About This Girl?
 
Whats your thoughts on this girl. Just launched the site a day ago


http://www.jennateenhottie.com/CrisDayOneCover1
I Wanna Be A Porn Star

PaulSweet 12-03-2002 11:03 AM

Seems cute, blurry photo esp her face

Cheshire 12-03-2002 11:10 AM

Girl = Good

Photography = Not So Good

PerfectionGirls 12-03-2002 11:10 AM

Yeah.. that damn Nikon CoolPix 5700. haha! Great camera.. to many bells and gadgets. Something to do with the focus plain on the camera.. It targets an area of great focus then some of the other area blur a bit. I know there is a setting to fix that.. I think its the "Landscape" setting. LOL! It was my first full shoot with this new camera. Thought is did ok.. but what do I know? Thanks for the input so far.

J

Supercharged 12-03-2002 11:21 AM

I think its called aperature setting ( or F stop ) ... and yes setting it to landscape would help that ( give it infinity focus, or a very small aperature), but it also changes the perspective of the image, I came across a website that showed some clear examples of this but can't recall it right now.

I believe using a small aperature for a large depth of field give you a "flat" image, where a larger aperature setting will cause some of your image to blur, it will give the image a 3 dimensional feel to it.

For 2-3k get yourself a Fuji S2, a couple of portrait prime lenses ( Nikon AF ) and a good flash with bounce SB50-DX, and read the instructions or buy a Nikon/Fuji guide booklet.

There is also some pretty good book out there for Portrait and Nude photography, break down and read a couple, shit even just looking at what some more experienced photographers do in terms of poses and angles would help alot.

vending_machine 12-03-2002 11:29 AM

Sorry, that design is horrible. Unless you intended for broken images that overlap each other all over the place that is... :)

SteveLightspeed 12-03-2002 11:30 AM

Hey PerfectionGirls

please contact me at icq 27295695, I have some ideas for ya

Steve Lightspeed

railz 12-03-2002 11:31 AM

Beautiful girl - terrible design and too high compression on the pics.

Drop me an ICQ if you need any help.

Kiko_Wu 12-03-2002 12:13 PM

Quote:

For 2-3k get yourself a Fuji S2, a couple of portrait prime lenses ( Nikon AF ) and a good flash with bounce SB50-DX, and read the instructions or buy a Nikon/Fuji guide booklet.
Primes are for film purists with no digital experience or people who parrot them without knowing the reason. The only reason to use primes is they have less chromatic distortion near the edges. Not an issue with the S2 because the CCD film plane is smaller then 35mm and crops well short of any possible distortion. On top of that multiple primes means dirt on the CCD and spending time to clean it off, or touch it up in photoshop. Unless they are using medium format no pro-digital photographer I have ever met still uses primes.

The SB50-DX is a good flash but an on camera flash is your worst possible option for shooting content. If you can't afford strobes go for halogens and a white foamcore bounce.

Juge 12-03-2002 12:54 PM

She's hot. Go for it!

Supercharged 12-03-2002 01:08 PM

I had actually suggested the primes cause you can get a fast ( F 1.8 or F2.8 ) lense for around $100. Instead of getting a shitty zoom and have to shoot with ISO400+

asuna 12-03-2002 01:10 PM

more pics

UncleJimmy 12-03-2002 01:11 PM

gotta see a nice sloppy facial to give an honest critique...but from the looks of it she'd look amazing with one...

Kiko_Wu 12-03-2002 01:51 PM

Quote:

I had actually suggested the primes cause you can get a fast ( F 1.8 or F2.8 ) lense for around $100. Instead of getting a shitty zoom and have to shoot with ISO400+
No, you suggested them because it was something you heard and you didn't know better then to repeat it and let someone else waste their money. You can get a perfectly good fixed aperture 2.8 zoom lens for under $500. None of the factors that distinguish the higher end Nikon glass from Sigma and Tamron even show up on digital images let alone on jpegs compressed for the web. If you can only afford a $100 for glass you should not buy a $2500 camera- makes no sense. You'll get better results from a pro-sumer camera with a fixed lens.

PerfectionGirls 12-03-2002 03:18 PM

Great info guys.... Yeah I know.. Damn Frontpage wants to set its OWN templetes sometimes. If you are looking at the site in High Rez... You will have some troubles. We are getting there boys.. Got pretty good girls and tons of content, but a few bugs yet to work out. We are converting though.. 1-250 almost right on the button since we opened eight months ago. Just started our affiliate also..

Thanks for the help!

See ya at the show!! The girl above will be there with me... so keep your nasty hands off her!! LOL I dont she would mind if you touch alittle! haha! By the way.. we have TONS of facials of her! haha

dig420 12-03-2002 03:34 PM

No, you suggested them because it was something you heard and you didn't know better then to repeat it and let someone else waste their money.
-----------

Kiko you can come over here and slap me around next...

maxcom 12-03-2002 03:38 PM

Quote:

I am eighteen as of the 24th of November 2002. Yes.. thats today!
um....

Supercharged 12-03-2002 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kiko_Wu


No, you suggested them because it was something you heard and you didn't know better then to repeat it and let someone else waste their money. You can get a perfectly good fixed aperture 2.8 zoom lens for under $500. None of the factors that distinguish the higher end Nikon glass from Sigma and Tamron even show up on digital images let alone on jpegs compressed for the web. If you can only afford a $100 for glass you should not buy a $2500 camera- makes no sense. You'll get better results from a pro-sumer camera with a fixed lens.

At least I suggested something... you only opened you big mouth to critisize me... so how about you Go Fuck Yourself ?
:321GFY

PerfectionGirls 12-03-2002 04:02 PM

No need to argue.. lol We shoot all digital.. Nikon Coolpix 5700

Martin 12-03-2002 04:13 PM

She game wood! Your Gold bro,,:thumbsup

Kiko_Wu 12-03-2002 05:09 PM

Quote:

so how about you Go Fuck Yourself
No freebies- I earn a living fucking myself :thumbsup

L0stMind 12-03-2002 06:00 PM

Dayum.

Why do I get turned on when a cute girl gets all intelligent and knocks everyone around?

railz 12-03-2002 06:02 PM

Frontpage? OWCH!

You added me to ICQ so drop me a message if you need some help.

PerfectionGirls 12-03-2002 08:15 PM

Turn on you icq then man. haha

Saintgames 12-03-2002 08:42 PM

She's a hottie, however, I agree the photos just aren?t clear and sharp enough and that'll hurt sales.

Martin 12-03-2002 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Martin
She game wood! Your Gold bro,,:thumbsup
Anybody know what I was trying to say there.. Damn wake and bake.. :stoned

LiveDose 12-03-2002 09:31 PM

Man, fix up the photos and design and you will do awesome. That girl is a looker...

good luck!

booker 12-03-2002 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UncleJimmy
gotta see a nice sloppy facial to give an honest critique...but from the looks of it she'd look amazing with one...
you said it!

Mogul 12-03-2002 10:08 PM

She looks nice.

As EVERYONE else has pointed out, the site and pics blow just like her :)

If you can clean it up, you should do fine.

Good luck!

Mogul
Mogul Networks Inc.

rowan 12-03-2002 10:14 PM

You need to resize the images in your preview, for example CrisPageTwo2.JPG has width=121 height=161, but the image is actually 288x384. If you let the browser resize it then it looks spotty or jagged, like it's not properly resampled.

Looks like CrisPageTwo2.JPG was already resized by something else that didn't do a good job (see the copyright notice) - what do you use? I bet the original pic is much better, but you've taken two big quality hits (for that particular pic anyway) on your tour pages...

dnsmonster 12-03-2002 10:32 PM

I want to know the name of the curly font that's used on that site.

Pornwolf 12-03-2002 11:06 PM

Kiko Wu's kinda feisty and smart too! I think I'm getting turned on... now where'd I put that kleenex?

PerfectionGirls 12-04-2002 07:40 AM

Yeah.. I see that what I am using to resize and watermark BLOWS ASS! haha! A "friend" of my is a programmer so he did this custom program for me. Bad Idea! Any sugestions? Something that will watermark and resize all in one shoop? I guess I need to resize each photo for my tour area one by one instead of doing one size then resizing it in Frontpage. God.. good shit! Learning more in one day then I have in the last eight months.
Yeah.. the original photos look great.. Hell there off a Nikon Coolpix 5700. 5.0 Mega Pixels baby! The resized ones are fine also, but when I resize the resized in my tour, thats where they get fucked up. I can fix that.
With all the bitching about photos and design.. we still are converting 1-250 right on the button since we opened eight months ago. Just think.. fix the design and photo glitch..... whoa... you guys best join my affiliate program. Just opened it by the way.

Really guys... thanks for the help and shot.

Anyways.. got to go... Lots of pictures to take

icq me if you wanna chat or whatever.

icq 176384083

ControlThy 12-04-2002 07:53 AM

She looks sexy.




http://delta3.bigcash.com/12070.gif
BigCash.com: Your Gateway to Serious Bucks!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123