GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   something I hate about Google search (searching for two terms) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=895374)

polish_aristocrat 03-23-2009 07:59 AM

something I hate about Google search (searching for two terms)
 
I think it used to be that when you searched google for

word1 word 2

it used to give you results of sites that contain both of these exact words in the exact form and spelling.
Right now, it's not really the case. Using AND between words doesn't seem to do the job either.

Also, sometimes I search for word1 word 2 and then google either assumes I mistyped one of these words and gives me automatically results for what they think is the correct spelling... or they include just a part of the search, like you'd search for "streetfights" and they'd also include sites containing just 'fights' (random example, not sure if accurate).

anyway, there are more important things to bitch about I know, but sometimes I really hate this..

or maybe I am missing something and there's a way to search google for two (or more) words and get results that feature sites containing always BOTH words in the exact form and spelling that I am looking for?

Helix 03-23-2009 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 15662237)
I think it used to be that when you searched google for

word1 word 2

it used to give you results of sites that contain both of these exact words in the exact form and spelling.
Right now, it's not really the case. Using AND between words doesn't seem to do the job either.

Also, sometimes I search for word1 word 2 and then google either assumes I mistyped one of these words and gives me automatically results for what they think is the correct spelling... or they include just a part of the search, like you'd search for "streetfights" and they'd also include sites containing just 'fights' (random example, not sure if accurate).

anyway, there are more important things to bitch about I know, but sometimes I really hate this..

or maybe I am missing something and there's a way to search google for two (or more) words and get results that feature sites containing always BOTH words in the exact form and spelling that I am looking for?

use advanced search

bloggerz 03-23-2009 08:28 AM

"use these"

polish_aristocrat 03-23-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 15662347)
(streetfights)

thanks, didn't know this one


Quote:

Originally Posted by bloggerz (Post 15662353)
"use these"

I use ".." very often, mostly when I want to search for a whole phrase, like "how to become rich" etc

what I hate as well, often I enter a page and the searched term is not there, it says it's been only found in links to that page or sth like that (in google cache)

Iron Fist 03-23-2009 08:48 AM

Also because of personal search and Google history being thrown into the mix, you really can't accurately SEO for terms anymore anyways.

polish_aristocrat 03-23-2009 01:12 PM

one bump :)

polish_aristocrat 03-25-2009 04:21 AM

final bump

rowan 03-25-2009 04:33 AM

Google does some other shifty things. Can't find the thread but I think it was in reference to google splitting a single word query into two words. You need to do something silly like search for:

word1word2 -"word1 word2"

In the past searching for word1word2 would give you the desired results. (Remember word1word2 is a SINGLE query, but G has detected two sequential dictionary words so it splits them. G obviously knows better than I regarding what I'm searching for.)

rowan 03-25-2009 04:36 AM

Looking again at the OP, streetfights is a good example of the problem I posted above. The blurbs for the first 10 results all contain "street fights", not a single one contains "streetfights"!!!

Voodoo 03-25-2009 04:36 AM

"verne troyer"+"sex tape"

rowan 03-25-2009 04:38 AM

Phase 1 is complete... Google are already making subtle changes to your searches... give it a few years and they'll have moulded our minds into believing everything they tell us.

HB|Sergio 03-25-2009 04:45 AM

Use Advanced serch and set special parametrs there and as somebody write already "verne troyer"+"sex tape" and be happy

polish_aristocrat 03-25-2009 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 15669724)
Looking again at the OP, streetfights is a good example of the problem I posted above. The blurbs for the first 10 results all contain "street fights", not a single one contains "streetfights"!!!

good catch, pisses me off :warning
not really see the reasoning behind it either

hmm I just checked Yahoo, this is how they do it:

We have included street fights results - Show only streetfights

at least that's slightly better/more user friendly

polish_aristocrat 03-25-2009 11:52 AM

same with teensex on google, they show results for teen sex

PornMD 03-25-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 15671318)
good catch, pisses me off :warning
not really see the reasoning behind it either

hmm I just checked Yahoo, this is how they do it:

We have included street fights results - Show only streetfights

at least that's slightly better/more user friendly

Yea, pisses me off too. Honestly, I'm not sure Google's the best anymore...everyone's just been accepting it the past 5+ years but maybe they really aren't anymore. They're obviously being overzealous about what people want in their results now.

who 03-25-2009 12:10 PM

"term1" +"term2"

Agent 488 03-25-2009 12:11 PM

yeah they changed something a few weeks ago and it is impossible to tie words togther now. sucks ass.

used to be able to use "word1 word2" or word1-word2 but those don't work anymore. don't know what happened.

Agent 488 03-25-2009 12:12 PM

plus results are filled with trusted site profile parasite hosting spam.

sex69 03-25-2009 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes (Post 15671378)
plus results are filled with trusted site profile parasite hosting spam.

Yes, I've seen such results dominating the serp recently

rowan 03-25-2009 12:25 PM

I just did a search for "muslin" (a type of fabric)

I was half expecting Google to show results for "muslim" :1orglaugh

Ayla_SquareTurtle 03-25-2009 12:40 PM

I've found ways around the fuckery, but I wish they would go back to just searching for what I actually searched for and not what they guess I might be searching for.

rowan 03-25-2009 12:42 PM

^ I wasn't that far off, after a couple of pages some of the results blurbs do contain the (misspelt) word "muslim." Google even highlights it for me.

borked 03-25-2009 02:17 PM

this is very recent (last 3-4 weeks afaik) - I noticed the same thing.... it used to be that both word1 and word2 had to be present somewhere on that page for the page to show. Now pages are showing up at the top for only word1 and have no word2 at all in them.

When I've noticed this, it's really frikken annoying - if I wanted pages not containing word2, I would have omitted word2 from the query

JamesK 03-25-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 15671349)
Yea, pisses me off too. Honestly, I'm not sure Google's the best anymore...everyone's just been accepting it the past 5+ years but maybe they really aren't anymore. They're obviously being overzealous about what people want in their results now.

My guess is they're going for the masses. And the majority of the people aren't advanced internet users and need Google's help with searches.

Snake Doctor 03-25-2009 02:32 PM

"the" is a common term and wasn't included in your search
"who" is a common term and wasn't included in your search

CyberHustler 03-25-2009 02:35 PM

adapt or die :upsidedow

Reak AGV 03-25-2009 02:38 PM

advance search + '' <content> '' works fine for me.

or define:

Vick! 03-25-2009 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 15669724)
Looking again at the OP, streetfights is a good example of the problem I posted above. The blurbs for the first 10 results all contain "street fights", not a single one contains "streetfights"!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 15671318)
good catch, pisses me off :warning
not really see the reasoning behind it either

hmm I just checked Yahoo, this is how they do it:

We have included street fights results - Show only streetfights

at least that's slightly better/more user friendly

See this:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...r ch&aq=f&oq=

Vick! 03-25-2009 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 15671325)
same with teensex on google, they show results for teen sex

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...rch&aq =f&oq=

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 15662372)
I use ".." very often, mostly when I want to search for a whole phrase, like "how to become rich" etc

If you only use "" when u search a whole phrase, and not use it with single or two words .. its your mistake, not google's.

If you type something, google will show the result that 95% of people are looking for .. and that would be usually teen sex or street fights .. for the rest of 5%, they should know what they are doing.. i.e. using appropriate search operators.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123