Easton stop stealing my photos
 

fucking-around-and-business-discussion/888259-stephanie-cane-available-custom-exclusive-content.html

I shot those photos for Gold Star Modeling and it looks like you are trying to pass them off as your own.

I did not get that feeling from the thread but...

nice pics

oh snap..

Thievery on GFY? Never~!!!

I didnt think he was claiming he took those, only showing what she looked like. Nice pics anyway.

He seems to be lining up buyers for when he's shooting her in a few weeks

sig spot installed

you're a clown for even thinking that Easton would "steal" your pics. (they aren't yours, they are Goldstars, according to you). He is trying to get these girls more work and I am pretty sure that Joel is happy about that. And I am also sure that Joel has no issue with Easton using a few pics to drum up more business for him and the girls.

My 2 cents

Sebastian

That's what I got too...

:thumbsup :thumbsup

Easton is a good guy, he was merely showing the girl. I do the same thing. I don't send people on gfy to an agency site, that would be dumb.

Really? I sure did.

wurd:thumbsup

Maybe steal is not the right word but he's advertising his content production services with photos that are not his own. How is that not misleading? It also looks like he is trying to represent her as well.

You don't own the pics and this really has nothing to do with you as Easton never put them up as his.

next thread

I do this sometimes and so do others because of this reason.... if its a girl that I am flying in and have not met her yet and didnt shoot with her yet, how could I show pics that I shot? You need to show prospective buyers something. Maybe next time I do that I'll be sure to mention that these were not my pics and maybe he could too but perhaps that will make sense to you.

Actually I do. It was a content trade shoot. And advertising your content work with someone else's work is extremely misleading.

this part is correct. it is.

dont listen to these idiots they know what you meant and most of them are doing the same kind of shit.

then the second it happens to them they are on here whining.

I sure did too! :thumbsup

I understand where you are coming from. I'm not against anybody here trying to get themselves or the model work. I felt like he was trying to pass off his work as my own. That's all. If it was clear he did not shoot the photos I wouldn't have brought anything up. I don't even care if he credits me, just that it's not misleading that those are his photos.

I didn't see it that way.

that chick will be drinking a beverage mixed in her ass soon- a big step on her downward spiral to the bottom of the pr0n industry.

Easton is a top notch stand up guy. I doubt he has time to steal any images and I would be willing to bet some money he did not steal these....geesh.

Brandon, if it was my pics I would be pissed as well. The least he could have done is credit you as the photographer or indicated they came from the modeling agency which I assume has your credit listed with them.

Could have been handled better.

cry me a fucking river...
the photos are the ones on goldstarmodeling web page
you'd fucking assume that the purpose of having those photos on their modeling/agent website is to promote her as a model for the purpose of adult modeling...
if goldstar does not credit Brandon, he should take it up with Joel.
:2 cents::2 cents:

Nice pics Brandon. :)

Not a cry me a river statement at all JP.

If you haven't had your work stolen or credited to someone else yet, get ready for the nice feeling of having your rectum stretched wide open without lube. I have had it done multiple times and it pisses me off to no end each time it happens.

We all work hard to promote ourselves day in and day out. I would absolutely want my name next to my shots, especially if it's another photographer using them in any purpose.

The Internet has made everyone feel like once a picture is put up it's public domain. At the very least, Easton should have put a credit indicating the pics were taken from the GoldStar Modeling site.

I can see your point but I think your out of sorts for no real reason


either way, nice pics :)

Yes, it's to promote the model. NOT HIS WORK!

I don't care about him crediting me. That's not what this is about. It's about misleading people to think the photos there are his.

i wonder why some of the goldstar model pics are watermarked and others, like these, are not.

Easton goes to webmaster shows. He is a stand up guy!

:1orglaugh

I'm not hating the guy. I'm sure he's great as a bunch of you are atesting. I just don't like seeing my work showing up from another content shooter when he is advertising his own services with no mention or indication those are not his photos. I have no ill will towards the guy, just the situation.

There was a period when they had different workflows. I used to agent, do the site, and shoot for them a while back. If there weren't watermarks on the photos it was because they had someone in the office that wasn't trained on how to do it.

He should have said the pictures were from Gold Star Modeling. I am surprised that they did not put their logo on the images.

what's with the blantant bot posts on here?

pornguy I did not get that feeling from the thread but...
Jon Clark oh snap..
Davey Jones sig spot installed (where is your sig?)
Sebastian wurd

and a few more ...

To be honest, i think it was just some people in the thread who assumed it was Eastons photos, not Easton trying to make people think they were his. Unlike some people on here, Easton doesn't have to stoop to such low levels for business... :2 cents:

1 2 3 4 I declare content war!

Yup if the post is less than a paragraph it HAS to be a bot! You fail at the interwebs... :helpme

I'm bookmarking this thread and adding it to my folder marked "Things That Can Easily and Effectively Be Handled Better On ICQ Or Email Than On GFY."

That thread didn't say "here are examples of my work", it said here are examples of what the model looks like. It didn't say "I just shot these pics" it said I am GOING TO be working with this model. That seems very clear to me....

If it didn't seem clear to you, send Easton a message on ICQ or email, his email address is IN THE THREAD you are upset about. Then the two of you can handle the matter like gentlemen. :2 cents:

yup that's how i see it too.. I've known Easton for many years and he is a stand up guy. He does this type of thing a lot where he will post agency photos to get work for a model he is shooting soon. I don't think he is trying to claim he shot anything and if you should be mad at anyone it's Gold star for not watermarking these photos like they did others to clearly show..

Brandon: I grabbed the pics from Goldstar's site to showcase her, as I have never even met the girl yet. Therefore, I didn't take those pictures. It seemed better than just putting up a link to her GSM profile. Since you say that you took the pictures, then any credit is due to yourself and Goldstar.

There's no disclaimer about the photos not being his. That's the major malfunction.

Then he should state that he did not take those pics. Simple but yet it was not done.


Easton should have known that people would think he shot them the way he passed them off on his post.


Easton, say sorry and lets move on:2 cents:

Yay!!!! we can all be friends again!! lol


Stephanie cane is good people.

thieves are only on those boards we are here not allowed to link to

Thanks Easton. I didn't expect it to turn into this much drama. I guess in the future, just make it more clear if you took the photos or not.

nice pics

Good god the collective stupidity on this board has reached an all new level.

i shot those pics