GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   16 illegals sue Arizona rancher (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=888313)

shahab6 02-16-2009 08:39 PM

16 illegals sue Arizona rancher
 
=
An Arizona man who has waged a 10-year campaign to stop a flood of illegal immigrants from crossing his property is being sued by 16 Mexican nationals who accuse him of conspiring to violate their civil rights when he stopped them at gunpoint on his ranch on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Roger Barnett, 64, began rounding up illegal immigrants in 1998 and turning them over to the U.S. Border Patrol, he said, after they destroyed his property, killed his calves and broke into his home.

His Cross Rail Ranch near Douglas, Ariz., is known by federal and county law enforcement authorities as "the avenue of choice" for immigrants seeking to enter the United States illegally.

Trial continues Monday in the federal lawsuit, which seeks $32 million in actual and punitive damages for civil rights violations, the infliction of emotional distress and other crimes. Also named are Mr. Barnett's wife, Barbara, his brother, Donald, and Larry Dever, sheriff in Cochise County, Ariz., where the Barnetts live. The civil trial is expected to continue until Friday.

The lawsuit is based on a March 7, 2004, incident in a dry wash on the 22,000-acre ranch, when he approached a group of illegal immigrants while carrying a gun and accompanied by a large dog.

Attorneys for the immigrants - five women and 11 men who were trying to cross illegally into the United States - have accused Mr. Barnett of holding the group captive at gunpoint, threatening to turn his dog loose on them and saying he would shoot anyone who tried to escape.

The immigrants are represented at trial by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), which also charged that Sheriff Dever did nothing to prevent Mr. Barnett from holding their clients at "gunpoint, yelling obscenities at them and kicking one of the women."

In the lawsuit, MALDEF said Mr. Barnett approached the group as the immigrants moved through his property, and that he was carrying a pistol and threatening them in English and Spanish. At one point, it said, Mr. Barnett's dog barked at several of the women and he yelled at them in Spanish, "My dog is hungry and he's hungry for buttocks."

The lawsuit said he then called his wife and two Border Patrol agents arrived at the site. It also said Mr. Barnett acknowledged that he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.

In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury. Mr. Barnett's attorney, David Hardy, had argued that illegal immigrants did not have the same rights as U.S. citizens.

Mr. Barnett told The Washington Times in a 2002 interview that he began rounding up illegal immigrants after they started to vandalize his property, northeast of Douglas along Arizona Highway 80. He said the immigrants tore up water pumps, killed calves, destroyed fences and gates, stole trucks and broke into his home.

Some of his cattle died from ingesting the plastic bottles left behind by the immigrants, he said, adding that he installed a faucet on an 8,000-gallon water tank so the immigrants would stop damaging the tank to get water.

Mr. Barnett said some of the ranch´s established immigrant trails were littered with trash 10 inches deep, including human waste, used toilet paper, soiled diapers, cigarette packs, clothes, backpacks, empty 1-gallon water bottles, chewing-gum wrappers and aluminum foil - which supposedly is used to pack the drugs the immigrant smugglers give their "clients" to keep them running.

He said he carried a pistol during his searches for the immigrants and had a rifle in his truck "for protection" against immigrant and drug smugglers, who often are armed.

A former Cochise County sheriff´s deputy who later was successful in the towing and propane business, Mr. Barnett spent $30,000 on electronic sensors, which he has hidden along established trails on his ranch. He searches the ranch for illegal immigrants in a pickup truck, dressed in a green shirt and camouflage hat, with his handgun and rifle, high-powered binoculars and a walkie-talkie.

His sprawling ranch became an illegal-immigration highway when the Border Patrol diverted its attention to several border towns in an effort to take control of the established ports of entry. That effort moved the illegal immigrants to the remote areas of the border, including the Cross Rail Ranch.

"This is my land. I´m the victim here," Mr. Barnett said. "When someone´s home and loved ones are in jeopardy and the government seemingly can´t do anything about it, I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands. And I always watch my back."

boneprone 02-16-2009 08:42 PM

Fucking Mexicans

421Fill 02-16-2009 08:44 PM

he should just set up land mines along his property lines

Spunky 02-16-2009 08:49 PM

He should get gaurd dogs to chase them back

NickB. 02-16-2009 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 421Fill (Post 15505739)
he should just set up land mines along his property lines

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

DaddyHalbucks 02-16-2009 09:15 PM

Our legal system would astonish Alice In Wonderland.

marketsmart 02-16-2009 09:43 PM

this is a classic example of why you leave no witnesses alive...

DarkJedi 02-16-2009 09:47 PM

Quote:

Roger Barnett, 64, began rounding up illegal immigrants in 1998 and turning them over to the U.S. Border Patrol, he said, after they destroyed his property, killed his calves and broke into his home.
why didnt he just shoot hem?

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-16-2009 09:53 PM

So when do illegal immigrants have rights in this country?

LiveDose 02-16-2009 09:58 PM

That makes me sick. Fucking lawyers.

Pics Traffic 02-16-2009 10:52 PM

Only in the america. Whats next?

Dirty F 02-17-2009 10:50 AM

What a fucking retarded story. Is there any way those Mexicans can win this? That would be insane.

Rochard 02-17-2009 11:39 AM

This is bullshit.

First of all, these people don't have any civil rights in America. They aren't Americans.

Second, they were here illegally, and trespassing on his property. He's had to arm himself to protect himself, and has suffered millions of dollars in property damage in the past decade.

What he did is called a citizen's arrest, plain and simple. He found a bunch of people breaking the law on his property.

Fuck this, these illegals should be thrown away in prison and locked away for a decade.

Tom_PM 02-17-2009 11:44 AM

Hell, he even installed water spigots for them to steal his water without destroying his cisterns and they still destroy his cisterns.

Nikki_Licks 02-17-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 15505926)
this is a classic example of why you leave no witnesses alive...

And toss them down a mine shaft when finished. There are allot of abandoned mines from Tucson to Phoenix. It wouldn't be hard to dispose of their asses and no one would have a clue they were at the bottom.

These fuckers have no rights here and they deserve nothing....PERIOD!

What gets me, is that there is a "NO Trespassing" law in effect in AZ and you technically can be shot for trespassing....maybe he should just posion the water.

pornguy 02-17-2009 12:18 PM

He is in a sticky spot, because of the idiot in Texas that pistol whipped a illegal immigrant. That immigrant now has his citizenship AND OWNS the guys ranch.

DrChango 02-17-2009 12:21 PM

Remember when the families of a dozen retards sued the US government because their relatives wandered into Death Valley after crossing the border and there weren't any water stations there?
Fucking bullshit. If I illegally crossed into, say, UZbekistan, I'd be shot before I even opened my damn mouth.

tranza 02-17-2009 12:22 PM

Whatever, hehehehehe.

BradM 02-17-2009 12:23 PM

This pisses me off. :)
I just threw a pale of shit on the LA Times for a recent illegal sob story piece. This one is even worse. If these fucks win... god damn this country.

John-ACWM 02-17-2009 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 421Fill (Post 15505739)
he should just set up land mines along his property lines

:1orglaugh

doridori 02-17-2009 12:25 PM

haha fucking crazy

escorpio 02-17-2009 07:20 PM

When you enter the country illegally you are subject to arrest and deportation, you do not lose your right to not be assaulted. Barnett is famous in Cochise county for his abuse of illegal immigrants. If he simply detained trespassers that wouldn't be a problem, but he takes it too far.

Moose 02-17-2009 07:24 PM

TUCSON, Ariz. ? A federal jury found Tuesday that a southern Arizona rancher didn't violate the civil rights of a group of illegal immigrants who claimed that he detained them at gunpoint in 2004.

The eight-member civil jury also found Roger Barnett wasn't liable on claims of battery and false imprisonment.

But the jury did find him liable on four claims of assault and four claims of infliction of emotional distress and ordered Barnett to pay $77,804 in damages ? $60,000 of which were punitive.

Barnett declined to comment afterward, but one of his attorneys, David Hardy, said the plaintiffs lost on the bulk of their claims and that Barnett has a good basis for appeal on the two counts on which he lost.

BusterBunny 02-17-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moose (Post 15512739)
TUCSON, Ariz. ? A federal jury found Tuesday that a southern Arizona rancher didn't violate the civil rights of a group of illegal immigrants who claimed that he detained them at gunpoint in 2004.

The eight-member civil jury also found Roger Barnett wasn't liable on claims of battery and false imprisonment.

But the jury did find him liable on four claims of assault and four claims of infliction of emotional distress and ordered Barnett to pay $77,804 in damages ? $60,000 of which were punitive.

Barnett declined to comment afterward, but one of his attorneys, David Hardy, said the plaintiffs lost on the bulk of their claims and that Barnett has a good basis for appeal on the two counts on which he lost.

even if he can't get the shit that stuck overturned someone will pay the fines for him i'm sure....but it sucks he has that on his record:winkwink:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123