Homeowner's gunfire foils invasion (video)
 

He's damn lucky or else just another statistic

pretty slick if you ask me :)

Probably would have been thrown in jail longer than the robbers if he killed one of them

In California he would have. I don't know about Arizona. Out here in the Midwest, I have the right to kill you if you are on my property. No questions asked.

Its definatly some dudes trying to jack drugs or somthing from this dude why whould he have survaliance and why whould people come in with ak's?

Wow... :1orglaugh

Did you just seriously ask why someone would have surveillance cameras?

Well some people rollin up with sparklin rims with ak's arnt there to jack his tv and vcr. Im just sayin dealers be havin servaliance and was just pointin out it wasent a casual robery.

You have spelled surveillance not only differently both times, but also wrong each time.
Now you are judging motives on someones rims - which just about every 20 something seems to have nowadays - hell cars now are coming stock with those things.

So only real thing is they must be after something illegal because they are running with an AK. They could of been after anything for all you know. Could of been something as silly as them knowing the house had some jewelry or guns it it, to something more sinister as a possible hit put on the dude by someone who just wanted him dead.

I have surveillance around my property and I would be surprised if many others on here did not as well, and we sure in the hell are not drug dealers.

I had the same thought when I was watching the video. I wouldn't think that thieves going to rob a house at noon on a weekday would need automatic weapons.

I dont care about spelling the net's short hand killed it and i dont care... And like i said it wasent a casualy robbery.. Yes it could have been a hit but why go in the house just wait tell they come out side..

Well no shit they were not no killers. Then again just how many idiots think they are again?

They had no reason at all to bring an AK either way. If your robbing the place you do not need a riffle - makes it hard to carry your loot. If your there to off the dude you practice better swarm techniques and do not flee the moment someone fires a round. They also did not check the place out beforehand much or odds are they would of noticed camera's.

quick grab and bounce is what they up to..

and they should have backed in too except then the car doors whouldent be there to block them if they were to have to hide behind them.

Same with Texas. Other states have a rule where you have to run to your house and only if they physically enter the house can you blast them.

You do not bring riffles to one of those. Maybe a handgun, but come on.
Suckers did not even have room in the car for much of anything.

These guys did it...

http://i42.tinypic.com/2duwhmg.gif

Not sure what video you guys are looking at but I don't see any "AK's" in it. I see what appears to be either an AR-15 or an M-4 "shorty" and only one at that. :error

I made assumption it was an AK when I viewed it and then saw all of the chatter with that name. Though I am sure I never made it plural.
Still see no reason for them to have brought it.

sorry i dont speak google look up for somthing you really dont know anything about to get a answer..

Yet another example of why the left needs to leave the guns the fuck alone. The US is in for a few really rough years when things actually head to and hit bottom. Having a democratic president may not be good for gun rights when people are really going to need them.

Hiding behind car doors does not work out well...

The man had balls and luck at the same time