![]() |
Is bounce rate the future of SEO?
Or are we already there?
By bounce rate I mean how long a visitor stays on your page after clicking your link in the SERPS. If he stays for a long time, browses a few pages, then the SERPS will assume that you have some useful information there on the topic and adjust your ranking accordingly. If he clicks the back button right away or clicks an off site link right away then maybe google decides the relevant info is contained in that off site link and not on your page? |
I've noticed good productivity helps in the search engines on my own sites
|
I think it is already here.
Not always for the best either since sites with creative redirects tend to have a low bounce rate. |
Quote:
|
there have been some tests and experiments on the seo sites pointing either way - as usual the only way to know for sure is to do your own tests -
|
How the hell can google know how long the surfer stays on your pages? (unless you're using google analytics)
|
Quote:
|
do tell more info please :)
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
which may mean that you found what you wanted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
a good bounce rate is under 40% and they only have the info if you have analytics on your site. (it is the number of people who leave your site in under x seconds)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good stats, but it lets google spy the hell out of you sites/network. |
google tools owns everything...
|
Google has different ways of determining stats such as bounce rate. The google toolbar is certainly one way. Another is putting cookies in surfers' browsers. Who knows what else.
|
Some google links are tracked when you click them
|
It's already within the formula and from what I'm seeing it's becoming a big deal.
The experiment went like this: Site A had a very crawlable structure, no javascript or whatever and aimed the keyword X. It had a lot of indexed content, but the bounce rate and time spent was very poor. Site B had next to no indexed content (all ajax), yet had very loyal visitors and a bounce rate of under 5% and also targetted the keyword X. Result? B dominated A. |
Quote:
|
I would be surprised if they don't use it, it makes too much sense to use bounce rate info in the rankings...
|
Did you know Google phones home clicks on results, even if you're not logged in? It's not done in an obvious way like Yahoo's redirect URLs; to the browser it's hard linked, but some additional background javascript quietly phones home each click.
|
google is evil
:party-smi |
Quote:
|
Quote:
WG |
I don't think the retention time (bounce rate) has that much of an impact, at least not yet. I've put disable back button code for surfers (but not bots) to increase the retention time and it had no effect on rankings. It does make sense to me though to use that as a guage of relevancy but its something blackhats could abuse pretty easily (faking a hit to google search and another fake hit to your site).
WG |
Quote:
|
SsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssHHHHHhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
Damn....stop fucking telling people about the "bounce rate" and effects on SEO. Now every fucking low life blackhat scum master is gonna exploit that feature. |
I'm sure bounce rate will eventually have a big diffrence in serp listings. It makes since because it would be the best way to gage the value of a page for the surfer.
If no one stays on the page and bounces right off, it's a damn good chance the site is a link farm or a spam page. |
if the only way they can tell is when the surfer returns to google, I think it will only be an issue for seo spammers who sites are nothing but garbage. I have one page sites that are just ads but have very nigh click through rates so the amount returning to google would be very small in comparison.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123