Wow! California Must Release Up To 40% Of Prison Population!
 

And they are all ready to start tube sites. Scary.

They'll release the rapists and keep the potheads in.

sounds about right :warning

And the rapists will start tube sites.

Scary thing is they probably will.

prisonrapetube.com

So fucking true.

Xpays is selling it on HuntingGoon.com for 25k or first to post sold. :2 cents:

"Those who would be released would be very low risk"
>Who determines shit like that I wonder ?

Yet another reason why drug sentencing laws and drug laws in general need to be reengineered. On the upside--I wonder how much money the State of California will save since they are $40B+ in the hole right now.

:2 cents:

This ruling could be a good thing...

this is an outrage.. a prision was my next step once unemployment reached my doorstep.

i think it costs the state around 2-3k per month for each inmate.... they'll save some nice $

it will for sure be non violent drug offenders

People are already fleeing California in droves, because of the illegal aliens.

reminds me of a rage against the machine song..

maybe ex prisoners realesed to deal with immigrants ? Any californians left ?

Or

these 40% all the people arrested for smoking weed?

Well, hopefully they make the right decision with who to release.

prisons and churches ftw

You most people in ther on drug charges are in there on OTHER charges. If someone gets high on pot and robs my house even if I think pot should be legal I still want the fucker in jail for robbing my house. Mnay are in ther for DEALING. Sorry HUGE difference between a occasional user and a dealer.

the answer is more prisons. You'll created jobs building the prison and having to staff them. that's great for the economy. Non violent offenders need to be in seperate prison than violent prisoners. Lifers and long term inmates need to be held in the same area as death row inmates and away from inmates that will be getting out soon.

:mad::mad:

:Oh crap

well if you area has 1000 criminals and your jail only holds 500 then yes you need more jailspace. Simple math really.

bullets are cheaper than room and board. line em up in the desert and get it done...

why should taxpayers pay to imprison murderers and rapists, when there is a cheap efficient method for dealing with these people?

There goes the neighbourhood

yeha how about releasing people who are not a danger to the public....

So it's better if those criminals are a danger to society than violating the rights of a person who committed crimes?

:2 cents:

What about investing in education, prevention or social reinsertion ?

Those maths aren't as simple as you think they might be.

Thank you!

The first post is so often overlooked. Not with me, baby. Not with me.

Good stuff...

:thumbsup:thumbsup

"Bubba raped me and now he's invading my personal space, MY RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED!!"

bwhahahhahaha

" Low risk " would mean not being a danger to others but that's not the only reason someone is put in prison.

You commit a crime and get convicted you are sentenced to incarceration. You lose certain rights like your freedom until your debt to society has been paid.

Seems to me the ONLY justification for keeping someone in jail is if they are a danger to someone else. :2 cents:

schools :(

How about deporting all the illegals and saving a lot more money?

a good point.. wonder what the taxable income the state lost?

They are fuckign illegals. They shouldn't have any rights.

Drugs are not a criminal offense. It is a health issue that needs to be treated by docters. Pot should be legal.

We should release all of these criminals to Mexico, I call this a fair exchange:1orglaugh.

:Oh crap:Oh crap

Why do prisoners have rights?