![]() |
its the auto unions fault
oh wait nissan doesnt have unions to deal with hmmmm
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/09/nis...rss_popstories |
blah blah. The unions do carry a lot of fault with the mess. Though it does not allow itself to fit perfectly into most peoples black and white views. Sales are down in general for automakers. So people are talking about surviving. Unions have gotten in the way of that here time and time again.
On Nissans behalf - no bonuses as well as payroll cuts for board members/officers, aside from firing 20k workers. Does it show anywhere how well they would be doing paying union wages, retirement plans, family health care and everything else attached or would they even still be around if they did that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The transition will be painful. To get back in the black, Nissan plans to reduce its head count by 20,000 employees, to 215,000 worldwide, by March 2010 and reduce labor costs in what it calls high-cost countries by 20%, to $7.8 billion." There is no worldwide healthcare I am aware of and there are plants in the US - which I would assume is a high cost country. |
Quote:
|
You have stressed over and over again your pro union and nothing at all will change that stance. No point in going back and forth on that. We are at fairly strong polarities on this. I dislike unions and while at it I also would destroy the board of ED, strip teachers of their unions as well and then make them all reapply for their jobs.
Also strongly think that seniority should not be a factor in auto jobs or most others and should be one of the lowest factors in keeping someone employed when a company needs to fire people. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123