Would you consider this type of content to be "non-nude"?
 

Would you guys consider this non-nude? Please give your reasoning...

http://www.omgzilla.com/karbon/karbon003_01.jpg

No, I see nipples. That's bare tits.

A hot girl nonetheless ;)

I'd consider it nude, because it is nude.

In laymans terms anyway.

I'd call this topless.

Love those mesh tops.

Yes, topless... nipples showing has to be considered topless...

do you see parts of a naked woman? duh...

Topless... Can see nips...

nude or non-nude, I'd consider it "lacivious exhibition" and thus falling under '2256/'2257

:2 cents:

topless, not non-nude imo.

If it makes her feel better about herself you can tell her it is NN.

its topless for sure, but if you ask in worldwide view, it depends on country if its nude or not :winkwink:

Tell her it's non nude but tell everyone else it's topless :)

Oh and we need to chat CF :)

Have her walk into a library or school.... if no one says anything, it's non nude.

Anything that shows nipples, bare ass or pussy = nude to me.
WG

Definitely not non nude.....nice boobies btw! :)

Just topless....nice tits :winkwink:

:thumbsup

:2 cents:

:upsidedow ɥsɐɹʇ ɹǝןıɐɹʇ

semi nude

(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;


i wouldnt consider breasts genitals, important distinction in this case, i would think


genitals = The reproductive organs

Yep this dude got it right..

She has impeccable fashion taste, and her vajayjay is covered - therefore, she's not nude...def consider it topless though.

http://www.asiandivagirls.com/gfy/adg_6232.jpg

Is Ashley (pictured above), whose breasts are fully covered in bodypaint, non-nude in the photo below?

http://www.asiandivagirls.com/gfy/adg_7850.jpg

ADG

topless for sure. Non-nude? not quite.

:2 cents:Topless :2 cents:

Nice nips!

Topless.

But I actually like baddogs answer on this one.

nope. cant show nipples.

Bringing an age old NNM topic to GFY?

can you see the nipple?

What make u think it could/may be nonnude?

Hmm, to me she is wearing clothes, so the answer is yes. To be nude is to be without clothes :-)

*hugs and kisses*

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Topless seems to be correct.

the whole NN/Nude/Implied Nude/Artistic Nude definitions are a joke.

go take a look at what some people classify as Non-Nude - CalistaModel with a dildo up her ass, Peachez giving a blowjob with a thong on - hysterical.

I don't even try to sell girls on NN modeling because it's far pervier than honest nude modeling.

there's Non-Nude/Implied Nude modeling and that means no nipples, no open leg showing any part of the genitilia - there's Playboy style nudes which is full nudity NO open leg shots, there's open leg nude modeling without pink, and then there's open leg nude modeling showing 'pink'.

that photo is topless - semi-nude. it's not NN.

Put it this way, if you were a content buyer wanting non-nude-only, and the seller tossed in a bunch of shots like that, would you pay for it?

I used to produce and sell a lot of non-nude bikini & lingerie content years ago and believe me no client of mine back then would have accepted see-through to the nipples shots like that.

That shot = definitely not non nude.

lol thats nude

Nipples = nude IMO

nipples = nudity.