![]() |
Is HD porn the future? only for you or every one? (HOT PICS INSIDE)
What do you think about hd porn. I think it sure can be the future and should be the future. still i see not that many sponsors switching to HD. It does cost more yes, does it pay more. I not that sure as many other content providers on the web are not shooting in HD so there are still niches where you don't even have a HD choice. But would you as surfer go for HD Porn? I would be then again my pc and IP allow it.
So my conclusion is that it all about the internet speed and for webmasters it is all about how much money more they make with turning their sites into HD sites. I think it is still a tricky thing in the industry. What do you think? O yeah here is some eye candy if you think this thread blows :pimp http://images.xcoreclub.com/pr/bonuspromo/059.jpg http://images.xcoreclub.com/pr/bonuspromo/024.jpg enjoy the pics :) |
youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level...
I wonder when there will be illegal tube offering HD video for free. |
i hope some illegal tubes do move to hd, and then we can laugh at their bandwidth costs.
|
there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.
the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not. |
Pretty nice babes!
|
Hot babes but even those have been squashed by the system here and dont look HD any more.
|
Nothing like shooting with an HD cam and squishing everything down in WMV.
And some things were never meant to be shot in HD. Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD. A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD. |
Nice nenas!
|
HD is the future
|
HD is the future and it is our only salvation against this much free porn on the net. That is why we have converted more than 20 of our sites to HD.
|
hot looking girls
|
Quote:
|
I would HD those two anyday of the week, that's for sure...
|
Quote:
just because YOU dont want to see it in HD, doesnt mean the ts lovers dont ese |
Cute girls
|
well all some good points here. But i guess we will not even be able aviod the HD train it is coming if you want it or ot. I happy that we are HD from the start and many years to come.
How about the prices, is profit just going donw or are memebership prices going up. I think there is a third solution, get the money you lose (earn less) some where else, like from an upsell or exit trades etc. May possible ways to maximize your profit off your members. What do you think? |
nice content
|
thanks man. we are trying to be the future. lol
|
pretty babes :)
|
Nice content, these girls are very hot! :thumbsup
|
We have been shooting in HD for a while and putting alot of our content out in HD lately. I think it's worth it if you have a good customer base.
|
Nice pics there, mate!
|
Quote:
The members want good porn first and last. Not HD. dirtymind there are so many things wrong with your second picture that I find it amazing you put it up as a sample to spam your work. The first girl is all right but I suspect a lot of Photoshop has gone into that picture. Do you do the same correcting with video? :Oh crap If you don't see what's wrong, a HD camera is not the solution. Lastly most people shooting in HD are clueless how to light it and what models should never be in front of a HD camera. |
lol at some of the responses in this thread.
|
Quote:
|
Paul Markham i don't see anything wrong with the second girl and seems the other people also dont see it. This thread is to talk about HD not about how the girls are shot.
If you had read this thread well you should now that i am not a content producers. Does this link to a content site? no. I do affiliate management. Second it sounds like you want to turn people off because you think there is something wrong with the second girl. go nag in some else thread, ok Paul Please stay on topic or stay out of the thread. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nice girls :)
|
Quote:
|
well i still have doubt if youtube will really need that hd player. I mean they have hardly any users shooting in hd. I think it would be their advertisers that will use it.
|
People have always wanted high quality stuff, wherever it's "true HD" or not is irrelevant, as long as your stuff is higher quality, loads faster, streams better, etc than your competitors you will get more signups/rebills...
|
well the loading it where the tricky part is and where also part of the investment is going to. streaming it online will take really fast connections. But also a fast connection on the part of the surfer. i think the surfer should makeup for its self if he is ready to watch hd. We could only advise him to download or stream it. noway people will stick around if you only have hd in your members are . For many it will take ages to download or to stream.
|
I have some badass HD domains if anyone is interested.
|
Most of the "ifs" in this thread have been reality for awhile. lol
|
true that most have been reality but for how many.
|
Quote:
|
Maybe after is IMAX porn ;)
|
hot girl§! :)
|
HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.
|
:thumbsup Nice girls :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
HD will be the standard one of these days
|
Quote:
' Besides, who wants to see some skank's butt zits in HD? Lo-Def hides the flaws we don't want to see. |
Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video.
But just like images, I prefer the super high quality huge high resolution images over small grainy ones. Back in the day there were only a handful of Alsscan type quality sites, but it's the standard now. When true HD video becomes available, surfers will definitely opt for it if it can be downloaded/saved and viewed quickly. If they have the hardware to handle it and the option of viewing HD vs regular, they'll choose HD. |
Quote:
|
lol at the skank whore with zits on her ass.....
But really, its fucking hard to shoot in HD, to be shot in HD, and I don't personally like seeing myself so clearly. Must be why I smoke weed. But really, most of the girls aren't perfect, myself included, so when HD does become the way, the only way, or whatever the fuck GFYers wanna call it, viewers will either love the girl, because being that she is shot in HD and still looks hot it will make the attraction that much stronger, or the viewer will hate the girl and be incredibly disappointed by how she "really looks". Its gotta be hard to find out that your favorite pornstar has really bad acne from years of meth abuse and the only reason you never knew is because videographers haven't been shooting in HD. I've fucked most of these bitches and trust me, HD shows just a little bit too much..... and that earlier post was right, capture's bitches MUST be shot in HD. Fly ass ho's |
Quote:
Did anyone notice that Youtube now allows 1GB uploads? Im doing my music stuff and uploading 720p vids which I can open full screen on a 22" monitor at TV quality or better. All you people best catch up. https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ Make sure to click the Watch in HD on the bottom right corner right under the video. Downloading gigs of content pfft lol Btw open that clip full screen, then try to tell me about can't stream HD pfft. We already were doing this months and months ago. |
Can I have some grainy vids please? I heard they are coming out with MOVING PICTURE SHOWS soon! woot! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
found direct link so you don't have to click watch in HD https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ&fmt=22 |
i think it's a touchy subject you can go either way. if you have surfers who are into HD content they will possibly like your hd content. but it's about the content first. if they arent drawn to it then it doesnt matter if you have it in HD. just look how many people go to tube sites with the crappiest quality.
Now if it's in HD what file sizes are you looking at? a 30min scene 720x540 at 2200kps you're looking at about 500-700mb. So how big is it for HD the same scene? 2gb ? that's kind of nuts for 1 scene. when you think about it members often download as much as they can for one month then quit. So you'll probably have to be one of those programs like realitykings that restricts the amount you can download in one day. that kind of sucks that you offer HD but then may have to restrict your members a daily download limit. or worse charge $50/month i just hope that HD is just a download option, because from my stats on my site members tend to download the high versions more than the DVD quality. you have 2 types of members: ones who go for the highest quality and save the movies they download and then there are the ones who download, whack off and delete. The latter just wants to tug one off so it's about downloading as fast as they can and ease of viewing content. of course there are all types of surfers, some download lower quality versions and like it and want higher quality rips for saving. like some posters said previously, it's about people's connections and computers. if you're itching to rub one out i dont want to wait 60 minutes for my download to finish and then be pissed when my computer goes into epileptic shock. or worse it ends up being a horrible scene and now i have to wait another 60 minutes for another download. and while many of us have fast connections you cant forget about the all your potential surfers. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123