GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is HD porn the future? only for you or every one? (HOT PICS INSIDE) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=873378)

dirtymind 12-04-2008 06:12 AM

Is HD porn the future? only for you or every one? (HOT PICS INSIDE)
 
What do you think about hd porn. I think it sure can be the future and should be the future. still i see not that many sponsors switching to HD. It does cost more yes, does it pay more. I not that sure as many other content providers on the web are not shooting in HD so there are still niches where you don't even have a HD choice. But would you as surfer go for HD Porn? I would be then again my pc and IP allow it.


So my conclusion is that it all about the internet speed and for webmasters it is all about how much money more they make with turning their sites into HD sites. I think it is still a tricky thing in the industry.

What do you think?

O yeah here is some eye candy if you think this thread blows :pimp

http://images.xcoreclub.com/pr/bonuspromo/059.jpg

http://images.xcoreclub.com/pr/bonuspromo/024.jpg

enjoy the pics :)

ilbb 12-04-2008 06:25 AM

youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level...

I wonder when there will be illegal tube offering HD video for free.

andy83 12-04-2008 06:39 AM

i hope some illegal tubes do move to hd, and then we can laugh at their bandwidth costs.

Mutt 12-04-2008 06:43 AM

there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

tranza 12-04-2008 06:43 AM

Pretty nice babes!

pornguy 12-04-2008 06:50 AM

Hot babes but even those have been squashed by the system here and dont look HD any more.

RedShoe 12-04-2008 07:21 AM

Nothing like shooting with an HD cam and squishing everything down in WMV.

And some things were never meant to be shot in HD.

Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD.

A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

kowalsky 12-04-2008 07:23 AM

Nice nenas!

LA Crew 12-04-2008 07:26 AM

HD is the future

CashGordon 12-04-2008 07:31 AM

HD is the future and it is our only salvation against this much free porn on the net. That is why we have converted more than 20 of our sites to HD.

Manowar 12-04-2008 07:32 AM

hot looking girls

mikesouth 12-04-2008 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15141293)
there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

yer a moron I have been doing real HD for almost a year play it on your puter, your PS3, or your xbox360.

CaptainHowdy 12-04-2008 09:08 AM

I would HD those two anyday of the week, that's for sure...

Fletch XXX 12-04-2008 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe (Post 15141404)

Dean Capture's stuff, HANDS DOWN needs to be in HD. Pretty girl should ONLY be viewed in HD.

A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

umm this makes no sense homie, sorry but I push shemale stuff and do not like "pretty girl" content, shemales should be shot in HD too. ;)

just because YOU dont want to see it in HD, doesnt mean the ts lovers dont ese

Kudles 12-04-2008 11:38 AM

Cute girls

dirtymind 12-05-2008 07:12 AM

well all some good points here. But i guess we will not even be able aviod the HD train it is coming if you want it or ot. I happy that we are HD from the start and many years to come.

How about the prices, is profit just going donw or are memebership prices going up.

I think there is a third solution, get the money you lose (earn less) some where else, like from an upsell or exit trades etc. May possible ways to maximize your profit off your members. What do you think?

HorseShit 12-05-2008 07:16 AM

nice content

dirtymind 12-05-2008 08:01 AM

thanks man. we are trying to be the future. lol

Serial Pervert 12-05-2008 08:16 AM

pretty babes :)

A-n-D-r-E-S 12-05-2008 09:37 AM

Nice content, these girls are very hot! :thumbsup

alexchechs 12-05-2008 11:38 AM

We have been shooting in HD for a while and putting alot of our content out in HD lately. I think it's worth it if you have a good customer base.

Chicks Delivery 12-05-2008 12:00 PM

Nice pics there, mate!

Paul Markham 12-05-2008 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15141293)
there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

That's something that flies over the top of most of the heads here.

The members want good porn first and last. Not HD.

dirtymind there are so many things wrong with your second picture that I find it amazing you put it up as a sample to spam your work. The first girl is all right but I suspect a lot of Photoshop has gone into that picture. Do you do the same correcting with video? :Oh crap

If you don't see what's wrong, a HD camera is not the solution.

Lastly most people shooting in HD are clueless how to light it and what models should never be in front of a HD camera.

stickyfingerz 12-05-2008 12:20 PM

lol at some of the responses in this thread.

Paul Markham 12-05-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15150404)
lol at some of the responses in this thread.

That's what I was thinking. :1orglaugh

dirtymind 12-05-2008 12:37 PM

Paul Markham i don't see anything wrong with the second girl and seems the other people also dont see it. This thread is to talk about HD not about how the girls are shot.

If you had read this thread well you should now that i am not a content producers. Does this link to a content site? no. I do affiliate management. Second it sounds like you want to turn people off because you think there is something wrong with the second girl. go nag in some else thread, ok Paul

Please stay on topic or stay out of the thread.

LisaWP 12-05-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe (Post 15141404)
A tranny taking it up the ass and leaking brown ooze around a loose shit hole, absolutely DOES NOT need to be in HD.

Thank you for helping me stay on a diet today. That visual has me queasy. :winkwink:

leek 12-05-2008 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilbb (Post 15141239)
youtube swtiched his player to HD already...it's time to move to another level...

Switching to HD certainly put Vimeo on the map. Although their extremely sexy site could have attributed also.

bbm 12-05-2008 01:28 PM

Nice girls :)

NaughtyRob 12-05-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15141293)
there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

While that is true the quality is amazing and way better than the highest quality SD. Forget the buffering, just let them download the videos.

dirtymind 12-05-2008 01:31 PM

well i still have doubt if youtube will really need that hd player. I mean they have hardly any users shooting in hd. I think it would be their advertisers that will use it.

woj 12-05-2008 01:42 PM

People have always wanted high quality stuff, wherever it's "true HD" or not is irrelevant, as long as your stuff is higher quality, loads faster, streams better, etc than your competitors you will get more signups/rebills...

dirtymind 12-06-2008 04:44 AM

well the loading it where the tricky part is and where also part of the investment is going to. streaming it online will take really fast connections. But also a fast connection on the part of the surfer. i think the surfer should makeup for its self if he is ready to watch hd. We could only advise him to download or stream it. noway people will stick around if you only have hd in your members are . For many it will take ages to download or to stream.

uno 12-06-2008 01:23 PM

I have some badass HD domains if anyone is interested.

stickyfingerz 12-06-2008 01:31 PM

Most of the "ifs" in this thread have been reality for awhile. lol

dirtymind 12-08-2008 06:56 AM

true that most have been reality but for how many.

stickyfingerz 12-08-2008 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtymind (Post 15161565)
true that most have been reality but for how many.

We stream 720p with no problems. :winkwink:

Ravensp 12-15-2008 09:21 AM

Maybe after is IMAX porn ;)

Violetta 12-15-2008 09:23 AM

hot girl§! :)

tony286 12-15-2008 09:34 AM

HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.

shako 12-15-2008 10:04 AM

:thumbsup Nice girls :thumbsup

stickyfingerz 12-15-2008 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15198373)
HD for porn is more of a marketing gimmick than anything online. Most surfers are on fair connections with older computers and old monitors. This is porn not national geographic ,hot action is what matters.

This is one of those things that you and I disagree on Tony lol :winkwink:

bloggingseo 12-15-2008 10:22 AM

HD will be the standard one of these days

bronco67 12-15-2008 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15141293)
there is no real HD on the Net - people's computers aren't even capable of playing back an HD file without tons of buffering - simply too much data for the average home computer.

the videos may have been shot in HD - that doesn't mean the web version of that movie is HD. it's not.

he's right.
'
Besides, who wants to see some skank's butt zits in HD? Lo-Def hides the flaws we don't want to see.

Drake 12-15-2008 10:31 AM

Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video.

But just like images, I prefer the super high quality huge high resolution images over small grainy ones. Back in the day there were only a handful of Alsscan type quality sites, but it's the standard now.

When true HD video becomes available, surfers will definitely opt for it if it can be downloaded/saved and viewed quickly. If they have the hardware to handle it and the option of viewing HD vs regular, they'll choose HD.

bronco67 12-15-2008 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 15198604)
Yes it's the future. However, it's not a necessity now and may never be a necessity since people can always get off on regular video.

I'm very into new tech, I build my own computers, I'm an internet geek, I love my HiDef TV set and Blu Ray HD DVDs, BUT -- I still prefer smaller clips when it comes to porn. As long as I can see that the girl is hot, and more importantly, the scene is well made and the director knows how to shoot the girl properly(and she gets hammered properly), I could really care less if I can count the skin cells on her forearm. Plus, I don't want to download gigabytes of porn video.

Penny Flame 12-15-2008 10:55 AM

lol at the skank whore with zits on her ass.....

But really, its fucking hard to shoot in HD, to be shot in HD, and I don't personally like seeing myself so clearly. Must be why I smoke weed.

But really, most of the girls aren't perfect, myself included, so when HD does become the way, the only way, or whatever the fuck GFYers wanna call it, viewers will either love the girl, because being that she is shot in HD and still looks hot it will make the attraction that much stronger, or the viewer will hate the girl and be incredibly disappointed by how she "really looks".

Its gotta be hard to find out that your favorite pornstar has really bad acne from years of meth abuse and the only reason you never knew is because videographers haven't been shooting in HD.

I've fucked most of these bitches and trust me, HD shows just a little bit too much.....

and that earlier post was right, capture's bitches MUST be shot in HD. Fly ass ho's

stickyfingerz 12-15-2008 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 15198674)
I'm very into new tech, I build my own computers, I'm an internet geek, I love my HiDef TV set and Blu Ray HD DVDs, BUT -- I still prefer smaller clips when it comes to porn. As long as I can see that the girl is hot, and more importantly, the scene is well made and the director knows how to shoot the girl properly(and she gets hammered properly), I could really care less if I can count the skin cells on her forearm. Plus, I don't want to download gigabytes of porn video.

If you are up on tech then you would know that streaming HD is not only possible, its already a reality.

Did anyone notice that Youtube now allows 1GB uploads? Im doing my music stuff and uploading 720p vids which I can open full screen on a 22" monitor at TV quality or better.

All you people best catch up.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ

Make sure to click the Watch in HD on the bottom right corner right under the video.

Downloading gigs of content pfft lol

Btw open that clip full screen, then try to tell me about can't stream HD pfft. We already were doing this months and months ago.

stickyfingerz 12-15-2008 11:06 AM

Can I have some grainy vids please? I heard they are coming out with MOVING PICTURE SHOWS soon! woot! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

found direct link so you don't have to click watch in HD

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fhKRhk49iqQ&fmt=22

PornstarXS 12-15-2008 11:07 AM

i think it's a touchy subject you can go either way. if you have surfers who are into HD content they will possibly like your hd content. but it's about the content first. if they arent drawn to it then it doesnt matter if you have it in HD. just look how many people go to tube sites with the crappiest quality.

Now if it's in HD what file sizes are you looking at? a 30min scene 720x540 at 2200kps you're looking at about 500-700mb. So how big is it for HD the same scene? 2gb ? that's kind of nuts for 1 scene. when you think about it members often download as much as they can for one month then quit. So you'll probably have to be one of those programs like realitykings that restricts the amount you can download in one day. that kind of sucks that you offer HD but then may have to restrict your members a daily download limit. or worse charge $50/month

i just hope that HD is just a download option, because from my stats on my site members tend to download the high versions more than the DVD quality. you have 2 types of members: ones who go for the highest quality and save the movies they download and then there are the ones who download, whack off and delete. The latter just wants to tug one off so it's about downloading as fast as they can and ease of viewing content. of course there are all types of surfers, some download lower quality versions and like it and want higher quality rips for saving.

like some posters said previously, it's about people's connections and computers. if you're itching to rub one out i dont want to wait 60 minutes for my download to finish and then be pissed when my computer goes into epileptic shock. or worse it ends up being a horrible scene and now i have to wait another 60 minutes for another download. and while many of us have fast connections you cant forget about the all your potential surfers.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123