GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Vote Rebublican (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=86503)

strainer 11-05-2002 08:45 AM

Vote Rebublican
 
Straight ticket... Every lever. Its true that if they get the house and sentate, we might all be looking for a job soon outside of porn, but if the pinko union boss trial attorney's union pacifist dems take over they'll hand the whole country over to Osama and Sadaam without so much of a whimper.

And we'll all be forced to wear towels on our head and pray 3 times a day.

pimplink 11-05-2002 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by strainer
Straight ticket... Every lever. Its true that if they get the house and sentate, we might all be looking for a job soon outside of porn, but if the pinko union boss trial attorney's union pacifist dems take over they'll hand the whole country over to Osama and Sadaam without so much of a whimper.

And we'll all be forced to wear towels on our head and pray 3 times a day.

:1orglaugh

A little bit of clarification:
Islam requires prayer 5 times a day. Not 3. As for the towels on the head, not every Moslem culture requires it.

Rich J. 11-05-2002 09:15 AM

Before you vote today please read the latest edition of THE DAILY DIRT.

Fire 11-05-2002 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich J.
Before you vote today please read the latest edition of THE DAILY DIRT.
I read it... but I'm still voting Republican.

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich J.
A little bit of clarification:
Islam requires prayer 5 times a day. Not 3. As for the towels on the head, not every Moslem culture requires it.

I could tolerate the 3 times a day.. but 5 is just pushing it too far!! :)

jqw736145 11-05-2002 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fire


I could tolerate the 3 times a day.. but 5 is just pushing it too far!! :)

why?

in which way have they actually improved america?

Hind 11-05-2002 10:23 AM

pimplink, you know the Che Guevara liked to get fucked in the ass by Camilo Cienfuegos and Castro? A true guerrilla gay man :1orglaugh

pimplink 11-05-2002 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hind
pimplink, you know the Che Guevara liked to get fucked in the ass by Camilo Cienfuegos and Castro? A true guerrilla gay man :1orglaugh
At this day and age, "gayness" is no longer a put down. Regardless of who he likes to sleep with, it doesn't detract from his guerrilla fighting genius. This is the genius I try to draw inspiration from in devising new and sneaky ways to get double opt in email traffic.

ChrisH 11-05-2002 10:36 AM

I don't think it would be a very good thing to have the GOP have the House, Senate, and the Executive Branch. Not just the GOP, I wouldn't want the Dems to have that kind of power either.

While the Lawyers do have the Dems in their pocket, lets not pretend that the Drug companies don't have the GOP in their pocket! It does go both ways, and you really can't fully trust either side too much!!

Need to have a balance, or well be over run by right wing Judges!

pimplink 11-05-2002 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisH


Need to have a balance, or well be over run by right wing Judges!

You can't be any more right. Let's all keep in mind that if it were not for the liberal justices that loosened state obscenity regulations in the Miller v. California case, we would not be in business today.

LBBV 11-05-2002 12:32 PM

As long as the Dems want to be the party that takes money away from me and gives it to those too damned lazy to work for a living, I'll be a Republican.

Democrats believe in a big-government welfare state. Now...they may be more liberal towards porn, but if you look at the big picture AND you stay legal, then this should be the least of your worries.

Every election, the Democrats also do the old "Republicans want to take your social security" in an effort to get the senior citizen vote, but the REPUBLICANS were the ones that recently tried to pass a bill GUARANTEEING social security and the Democrats voted it down. Why? They wouldn't be able to use it as a campaign issue anymore.

Democrats have also proven time and time again that the constitution is merely a "suggestion" to them...

And of course, as we know, the Democrats are against the war on terror...

Vote Republican if you care about your money...

Sunshine McGillicutty 11-05-2002 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LBBV
As long as the Dems want to be the party that takes money away from me and gives it to those too damned lazy to work for a living, I'll be a Republican.

Democrats believe in a big-government welfare state. Now...they may be more liberal towards porn, but if you look at the big picture AND you stay legal, then this should be the least of your worries.

No, what is important is not having the religious right, which controls the republican party, in control of all three branches of government. If that means electing socialists to the senate, then it will be worth it in the long run.

Quote:

Every election, the Democrats also do the old "Republicans want to take your social security"
3 years ago the Republicans wanted to force people to invest their social security money in the stock market. What would have happened over the last 3 years had they suceeded? I thought so.

Don't whine about the Demo's using the follies of your parties policies as a campaign issue. That is what politics is about.

Quote:

Democrats have also proven time and time again that the constitution is merely a "suggestion" to them...
:1orglaugh What a ridiculous lie. You are just cutting & pasting lines from the religious rights playbook.

Quote:

And of course, as we know, the Democrats are against the war on terror...
Lying again.

strainer 11-05-2002 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sunshine McGillicutty


3 years ago the Republicans wanted to force people to invest their social security money in the stock market. What would have happened over the last 3 years had they suceeded? I thought so.

Lying again.

In all my years of surfing the web and reading people's thoughts, this is arguably the singular most stupid thing I have ever seen. Its one thing of course for the Democrats to repeat this every day, (gets em votes with the plus 90 crowd without too much cerebral matter left) but you mean people actually believe this???

What the Republicans wanted, was for you and I to OPTIONALLY allocate 5% (or so) of our retirement in broad sectors of the U.S. economy, a strategy that over any 10 year segment of the history of the U.S. would ALWAYS yield a profit.

Don't know about you but my 401K is doing great, up around 10% this year. Any idiot dumb enough to have his entire future invested in tech stocks deserved to be separated from it - clouds up the gene pool, in my opinion, and maybe if he is poor he won't breed.

You left off the part that letting people invest around 5% in stocks would save the system. Absent that, it runs out of money in about 30 years.

LBBV 11-05-2002 01:11 PM

I can assure you that I am NOT a part of the "religious right" :)

I'm just not a fan of big government or welfare systems.

LBBV 11-05-2002 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by strainer


In all my years of surfing the web and reading people's thoughts, this is arguably the singular most stupid thing I have ever seen. Its one thing of course for the Democrats to repeat this every day, (gets em votes with the plus 90 crowd without too much cerebral matter left) but you mean people actually believe this???

What the Republicans wanted, was for you and I to OPTIONALLY allocate 5% (or so) of our retirement in broad sectors of the U.S. economy, a strategy that over any 10 year segment of the history of the U.S. would ALWAYS yield a profit.

Don't know about you but my 401K is doing great, up around 10% this year. Any idiot dumb enough to have his entire future invested in tech stocks deserved to be separated from it - clouds up the gene pool, in my opinion, and maybe if he is poor he won't breed.

You left off the part that letting people invest around 5% in stocks would save the system. Absent that, it runs out of money in about 30 years.

Right on :thumbsup

It was NEVER about the GOVERNMENT investing social security in stocks...it was about US having the option to invest part of OUR social security taxes in the stock market, which I think is an EXCELLENT plan. I SHOULD have some say in where my social security money goes. I can most certainly do better than the current rate of interest that social security gets...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123