NYT column: White liberals not supporting Obama must be RACIST
 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/05/op...05kristof.html

His theory summarized "White liberals have unconscious biases towards Blacks."

Please vote for Obama!!!!!!!! :))

It ends with:
"But when there are other bystanders, so the individual responsibility to summon help may feel less obvious, whites will still summon help 75 percent of the time if the victim is white but only 38 percent of the time if the victim is black."

Translation: "The black man (Obama) is in trouble, if you don't help him then you must have unconscious racist biases." :)

well im sure their right to some percentage no secret there

I know a bunch of people that arent voting for obama because he is black. These were people close to me that said its the democrats turn and when it turned out to be obama the song changed. lol

People who are going to vote for him are going to but worth a watch....

Part 1
https://youtube.com/watch?v=p_HZMD97nMw
Part 2
https://youtube.com/watch?v=h1TAnDcQyjA
Part 3
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7y3U383Ffuk
Part 4
https://youtube.com/watch?v=h7g__--BJ9I
Part 5
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GxCZzxEfUAs
Part 6
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yxfQD4If7kk

Holy shit, he did questionable things in COLLEGE ????? NO WAY !!!!
fucking terrorist !!!!:helpme

This guy is talking about stereotypes. They have done enough testing to know that you can match stereotyping to unknown-subconscious racism do the mass exposure of the trash.

It's the same as the old white rich guy vs. the young successful male of any color guy vs. a successful rich female. Adding black, adding a female, or an old man - takes it up a notch all the way around. Unknown stereotypes and incorrect knowledge will leads people subconscious to trick you without knowing it.

This election is a stereotype vs a stereotype. I think the question may be, do people subconscious minds trust the young black guy or the old rich guy?

Haha, anything Fox spits out is total slander. They aren't a media source at all. They spew less facts than the national enquirer. They aren't owned, controlled, or even upper level managed by Americans and are clearly, without question, a tool used by the Gov Media.

They do show more boobs, half upskirt shots, and leg shots than all other media sources combined. And known to call elections as final before the votes are even counted.

Yep, we should all trust what Fox News has to say!

If they choose to not vote for him because hes black, then its obvious they are racist. If they don't vote for him because of some other reason, then they're not. Its pretty simple.

Just because it's printed doesnt mean I give a shit about some guys opinion. It's not a news story. It's one dudes brain only if I am reading the URL correctly.

(BY THE WAY: nytimes requires that you register before you can read. So for me anyway, it was impossible to read what you linked.)