Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750151)

pussyserver...why do you care? You're not a photographer or anything else. LOL
I'll give you a quick clue: Like everything else that you talk about, it's a lot more complicated than you think. You can't just buy a lens because it's the "best"

It depends first of all on what camera body you own. And then it depends on where you do the majority of your shooting.

The correct answer to this question isn't "Canon or Nikon" it's: If you had to have ONE lens it would be the one that is the most versatile for your camera body. Probably something that is a 24/105 mm with the proper F for the lighing conditions that you work in.

That's what I use for shooting content. The nicest all around lens I can get for my camera body. It's an $1100 piece of glass so it's not too expensive, yet it works just great for shooting a big tit girl having sex.

I also have a fish eye lens that I whip out every once in a while for one of those extreme big tit or big ass shots. But it mostly collects dust when I'm in the middle of shooting a hardcore scene as I don't have time to change lenses.

Now you can go down to Walmart and get that disposable kodak camera for $3.95 that you have had your eye on.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750194)

Robbi you are such a loser LMAO

you are not even worth my time

be gone loser:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


any photographr knows that when I said canonor nikon that I was saying either brand is fine

get a fuckin life

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14750207)

Robbi's advice was actually very good.

It was YOUR response that I typically expected.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750219)

thas your opinion

Robbie opens any convo with me with an insult

thats not good advice


and as far as the lens me personally I have always went deeper at leat 200 or so and got down low as I could on F

but everyone has his/her own style

Just because a lens can "on paper" do 24 to whatever there is always a tradeoff and ifyou lens is your income... the tradeoff is what you canyt afford

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750253)

pussyserver....you are a psychotic biipolar person. First you claimed that you were so rich and so "above" me that I couldn't even understand the circle of people that you run with in this business. Of course nobody in this business knows or has met you.

Then you claimed to be some kind of undercover agent.

And then you were found to have underage girls (I'm talking 8 and 10 years old) all over your forum.

Then you deleted that and tried to claim that all of us that saw them (including the screenshot that Mutt had posted before Eric removed it because of the CP on it) were hallucinating. And you also claimed that removeyourcontent.com was full of shit when the dmca'ed you for all the stolen content you had as well.

Then you stole the graphic header from another site for your forum and tried to claim that you were "helping" them by doing that.

And now you are a photographer today?

And tomorrow you will be an astronaut, and then perhaps a surgeon. Or maybe a race car driver.

In the fantasy world of pussyserver...anything is possible.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750219)

thas your opinion

Robbie opens any convo with me with an insult

thats not good advice


and as far as the lens me personally I have always went deeper at leat 200 or so and got down low as I could on F

but everyone has his/her own style

Just because a lens can "on paper" do 24 to whatever there is always a tradeoff and ifyou lens is your income... the tradeoff is what you canyt afford

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14750287)

The difference between what a lens can do "on paper" and how it actually performs isn't the litmus test for how much revenue it will result in.

By your logic - indirectly you're saying if you have a greater wide angle capability with less barrel distortion in one lens compared to another - your income would be greater.

This is putting too much credit on the technical hardware aspect as opposed to the skill and experience of the photographer.

You learn to work within the parameters of any piece of camera gear and maximize its capabilities through experience. Over the years I've seen talented photographers turn out amazing images with what would be considered mediocre cameras.

For the record, I'm currently shootin' with an AF-S 18-200mm DX VR nikkor on my D80. Its replaced the 18-70mm and 55-200mm nikkor I started with - simply because I grew tired of swappin' out lenses and risking dust/dirt on the sensor array each time.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750274)

all bullshit

all lies


and Robbie you had CP on your sites Robbie had 5 year old posing naked on his page

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750324)

Why do you do this to yourself?
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=850174

And here was Eric's response to the many webmasters who saw the CP on your site and were disgusted and posted it on GFY for all to see what you really are: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...34&postcount=1

And yes, I showed Eric your forum and the pages with the CP on it and yes he was disgusted and made note of it as well.

So me, a dozen or so webmasters on GFY, Eric, and the people at remove your content are all lying and you are telling the truth?

Okay MR. Undercover/Millionaire/InternetPimp/Photographer :pimp

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750363)

What? pussyserver you are completely out there.

First anyone here that wants to see all of your claims of being rich and a govt. agent and all your other bullshit can just search all of your threads...that is if they want to play "7 degrees of retardation"

As for what was on your site..."cc bill processed" What the fuck are you talking about? Those pictures were of children and were posted in your forum and the poster was given props from the mod (probably you) AND was rewarded with "points" from your site as well.

I'm telling you...you should really back the fuck up when you do shit like that. You are walking a thin line right towards prison.

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 14750387)

http://myblahg.com/wp-content/upload...oding_head.jpg

Robbie, you don't care that people think you take this place way too seriously. What makes you think Pussyserver gives a fuck what you think about him?

Save your breath.

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14750287)

The difference between what a lens can do "on paper" and how it actually performs isn't the litmus test for how much revenue it will result in.

By your logic - indirectly you're saying if you have a greater wide angle capability with less barrel distortion in one lens compared to another - your income would be greater.

This is putting too much credit on the technical hardware aspect as opposed to the skill and experience of the photographer.

You learn to work within the parameters of any piece of camera gear and maximize its capabilities through experience. Over the years I've seen talented photographers turn out amazing images with what would be considered mediocre cameras.

For the record, I'm currently shootin' with an AF-S 18-200mm DX VR nikkor on my D80. Its replaced the 18-70mm and 55-200mm nikkor I started with - simply because I grew tired of swappin' out lenses and risking dust/dirt on the sensor array each time.

Originally Posted by Equinox (Post 14750316)

My D3 + 24-70/2.8. Love it.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750774)

Not withstanding the original poster....
I'm using a Canon EOS 5D with a Canon CA247028LEF Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

That would be what the expert pussyserver said:
"well i guess you would not be depending on that glass to pay your bills
as an adult phoyog if thays your pick... lol i hate to see your content"

So here is an example of my poor content that doesn't make me any money The lens seems to do just fine for me to shoot content without having to do a lot of lens changes. The whole setup is under 5 grand. I'm sure that I could have gotten more expensive gear, but this seems to do the trick for shooting content on the web:

http://claudia-marie.com/fun/claudia-marie00069.jpg

http://claudia-marie.com/fun/claudia-marie000069.jpg

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750774)

Not withstanding the original poster....
I'm using a Canon EOS 5D with a Canon CA247028LEF Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750787)

on a side note... your images are decent but far from professional

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750816)

Definition of "professional" is someone who makes a living doing something. Been making a living...a pretty good one since the mid-1990's. I'm gonna go with my decent photos filling the need of the big tit niche and making bank. And you KNOW why I don't like you. You are a disrespectful person who talked shit to me the first time we encountered one another. And to further it you have said and done some things that are beyond the pale. I just don't like you, and I read your stuff in disbelief.

I would like to put it behind me. I gave you some excellent advise to check out Phil Askey's site and do some research. But when you come on here and once again pretend that you are an expert on something else you don't know much about...I can't help myself. It's like an addiction :1orglaugh Please check out Askeys' site. He really is the man. And you could learn something and maybe get a clue.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750839)

as far as that guys site .. thats great advice... but I am a bit past that stage.... but as always I apreciate the effort:thumbsup

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 14750838)

I'm actually starting to like Robbie now. I guess I was wrong before.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750852)

It's about time you saw the light motherfucker :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750839)

if you or anyone else can show me being direspectful or starting drama with you first.... i will epass you 100

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14422647)

Hi pussyserver....what exactly do you do in adult? I'm always looking for even more ways to make money. Since you're on GFY, which is supposed to be for people in the business to meet, I'd like to know what your business is. And if it's of any use to me to make money. :) Thanks.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14422762)

The reason I and others are so secretive with what we do and even have our webmaster do NDA's on FHG's because the industry is full of parasites who suck down others ideas, biz models and concepts and ruin them without even making a profit
I have no need to advertise just to prove to some lower bracket wanna bes who I am.... if a person dont like the fact that I dont have a sig ... the answer is simple.... dont do biz with me
... this has not hurt my ability to do biz... but to each his / her own
If promoting some program or some whatever in a sig is the primary factor in your
...... never mind lol
have a great day everyone
its the 4th
God Bless America

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14423006)

So how the hell do I know who you are and what your program is? That's all I'm saying. As far as nda's on a fhg....WTF??? What's the big secret that I can't see when I LOOK at a FHG? You're not making any sense bro. If a business model is a "secret" it's because it isn't working and nobody has seen the result. And if nobody knows you...then how do people work with you?
Bro, I know and/or promote damn near everybody that is in adult. But I don't recall anybody named "pussyserver" who was a multi-millionaire with a big branded name program that had FHG's which contained some kind of secret code that I couldn't see in the source.
I'll give you this much...you are pretty much misguided in your bullshit. If you're gonna pretend to be a porn mogul, don't talk about non-disclosure agreements about a freaking FHG! LOL! And don't talk about business models being stolen simply by showing people your program.
Earth to pussyserver...that is what you WANT to do. You want people to see your sites to make money.
This has been fun. And stupid all at the same time. Kinda like my sex life. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14423370)

Robbie believe or think whatever you want to believe or think?. I think I have made it clear that I could care less

If I wanted to do biz or have done biz?.. then we would know each other. But I have nothing to offer you ? and you have nothing to offer me.

People I work with know who they are?? some circles are in fact closed fella. Furthermore I can pretty much assure you that I would never work with you on anything
I build my teams with leaders ?. Not followers

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14423526)

okies
you know funny thing is I think I met you in Tampa last year

in any case
conversation over

im your sworn enemy yadda yadda yadda not in the biz etc etc etc... no money.... yadda yadda yadda ... homeless tc etc etc

Enjoy the the rest of your 4th :)

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14423587)

You did NOT meet me in Tampa last year. I wasn't IN Tampa last year. LOL! And you're not my "sworn enemy". I merely asked you what business you had here. And you answered in a bunch of double talk that said NOTHING.

Then you had the disrespect to insinuate that you run in "circles" that are above me. And then you made the statement that insinuated that I am a "follower" and below your consideration.

Brother, you have NEVER met me. And though I don't close any "circles" I run in, I'm sure that you aren't running with me or my friends in this business.
I am not gonna give you hell on here and wage any kind of war with you. I'm just letting you know, that everybody on here that really IS in this business knows that you are not.
And it's just plain out creepy that guys that are not in this business somehow get off on coming on here and pretending they are while they throw around terminology that they learned from this board.

Maybe I'm wrong about you. Well, just have ONE person that is KNOWN in this business stand up and say that they know you.

I will immediately apologize and show you due respect as my colleague.

I am not angry at you...except for the fact that all these surfers pretending to be in the adult business tend to make the real people in the business look bad by doing the kinds of things that you have done in your past posts.

Anyway, I have nothing against you. And I'm sorry for any embarrasment my questions brought to you.

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14423683)

lol whatever little guy
you take it easy my friend

Originally Posted by pussyserver (Post 14750208)

and FYI your pick is horrible... a 24 105 are you serious??

lmoa

well i guess you would not be depending on that glass to pay your bills

as an adult phoyog if thays your pick... lol i hate to see your content:2 cents:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750852)

It's about time you saw the light motherfucker :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14750287)

For the record, I'm currently shootin' with an AF-S 18-200mm DX VR nikkor on my D80.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14750821)

THe piece of glass I miss the most was the lens built into my e 10 it was amazing. 24-70L isnt even close.

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 14750387)

http://myblahg.com/wp-content/upload...oding_head.jpg

Robbie, you don't care that people think you take this place way too seriously. What makes you think Pussyserver gives a fuck what you think about him?

Save your breath.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 14753077)

If you can only afford one lens you should not be a photographer.

For digital it's a pro wide angle to around 150-200 mm.

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 14753246)

There are some situations that call for using just one lens: I spent 2 months in Russia / Mongolia on a bicycle - no space to haul multiple lenses, so the 17-40 won out for me.

Incidentally, 150-200 isn't exactly wide ;)

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14753630)

I picked up the 18-200mm just before taking holidays in Atlantic City and was glad I did. I must've walked up and down the boardwalk 30-40 miles during the week and thankfully didn't have to carry the camera bag with additional lenses the whole time.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 14750151)

pussyserver...why do you care? You're not a photographer or anything else. LOL
I'll give you a quick clue: Like everything else that you talk about, it's a lot more complicated than you think. You can't just buy a lens because it's the "best"

It depends first of all on what camera body you own. And then it depends on where you do the majority of your shooting.

The correct answer to this question isn't "Canon or Nikon" it's: If you had to have ONE lens it would be the one that is the most versatile for your camera body. Probably something that is a 24/70 mm with the proper F for the lighing conditions that you work in.

That's what I use for shooting content. The nicest all around lens I can get for my camera body. It's an $1100 piece of glass so it's not too expensive, yet it works just great for shooting a big tit girl having sex.

I also have a fish eye lens that I whip out every once in a while for one of those extreme big tit or big ass shots. But it mostly collects dust when I'm in the middle of shooting a hardcore scene as I don't have time to change lenses.

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 14750903)

T if I had to buy one lens to accomplish everything for a month, it would be this lens...Hands down.

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...modeli d=9802