GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Another Palin Smear Bites The Dust :) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=853180)

Gouge 09-06-2008 12:30 AM

Another Palin Smear Bites The Dust :)
 
Conspiracy theorists, nutcase bloggers and the hard-left fail again.

Just spitballing here, but isn?t this an extra dollop of irony? Mr. Richter wants to protect his son from lunatics. What happens? The lunatics use that as ?evidence? that Palin had an affair with Richter and descend on him to get the dirt...that was never there.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...l?link=rssfeed

tony286 09-06-2008 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gouge (Post 14715809)
Conspiracy theorists, nutcase bloggers and the hard-left fail again.

Just spitballing here, but isn?t this an extra dollop of irony? Mr. Richter wants to protect his son from lunatics. What happens? The lunatics use that as ?evidence? that Palin had an affair with Richter and descend on him to get the dirt...that was never there.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...l?link=rssfeed

and we know this because he said so?

tony286 09-06-2008 12:33 AM

also the right had no problem when the enquirers guns were focused on john edwards.

baddog 09-06-2008 12:39 AM

Did people outside of GFY and the National Enquirer think it was true?

After Shock Media 09-06-2008 12:42 AM

I still am not sure how it has been proven or even disproved yet.

Though I am just a silly gfy user which automatically knocks my intelligence down the ladder many rungs.

potter 09-06-2008 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14715835)
I still am not sure how it has been proven or even disproved yet.

Though I am just a silly gfy user which automatically knocks my intelligence down the ladder many rungs.

whatever that crazy dude said.

Gouge 09-06-2008 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14715821)
also the right had no problem when the enquirers guns were focused on john edwards.

The John Edwards affair was an actually news story that took a year in the making with investigators and journalist working the leads.

This was just as i said, Conspiracy theorists, nutcase bloggers and the hard-leftist grasping for straws.

If you read Mr. Richter's filed motion to seal the records is pretty clear. Now that they are out in the open there is no sign of any affair. I went to http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov where i have an account and downloaded all 221 pages and its all courts briefs, divorce papers and settlement arrangements for the divorce.

Sorry to disapoint but Sarah Palin's name dosent appear on any document of the case.

Gouge 09-06-2008 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14715830)
Did people outside of GFY and the National Enquirer think it was true?

Keith Olbermann ran with the story and mentioned it two days in a row on his count down to no ratings show.

After Shock Media 09-06-2008 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gouge (Post 14715843)
The John Edwards affair was an actually news story that took a year in the making with investigators and journalist working the leads.

This was just as i said, Conspiracy theorists, nutcase bloggers and the hard-leftist grasping for straws.

If you read Mr. Richter's filed motion to seal the records is pretty clear. Now that they are out in the open there is no sign of any affair. I went to http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov where i have an account and downloaded all 221 pages and its all courts briefs, divorce papers and settlement arrangements for the divorce.

Sorry to disapoint but Sarah Palin's name dosent appear on any document of the case.

As stated I had not made up my mind on it yet nor let it past the rumor stage. However I am also not an investigative journalist, private eye, or tapped into the tell all your secrets housewife crowd like the national enquirer is. I could still wonder if it is not something glaring like actually having her name printed in it, or something that requires more digging and will lead elsewhere to more information such as an account or strange gift for instance.

baddog 09-06-2008 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gouge (Post 14715852)
Keith Olbermann ran with the story and mentioned it two days in a row on his count down to no ratings show.

I know the name and face, don't know his politics.

After Shock Media 09-06-2008 12:50 AM

Since I honestly do not know, who first broke the Edwards affair as a rumor? You know started the ball rolling a year ago.

tony286 09-06-2008 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14715860)
I know the name and face, don't know his politics.

liberal beats up on bill oreilly on the weekly basis

baddog 09-06-2008 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14715865)
liberal beats up on bill oreilly on the weekly basis

That's why I don't watch shows like that (either of them).

Gouge 09-06-2008 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14715856)
As stated I had not made up my mind on it yet nor let it past the rumor stage. However I am also not an investigative journalist, private eye, or tapped into the tell all your secrets housewife crowd like the national enquirer is. I could still wonder if it is not something glaring like actually having her name printed in it, or something that requires more digging and will lead elsewhere to more information such as an account or strange gift for instance.

Considering how the accusation against her was an affair and with her name not on any of the 221 pages where else would it go? But i grasp what your saying and i thought of the same thing when i was scrolling down the pdf file.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123