Who would rather go to war with?
 

You you rather go to war with McCain....or go to War with Obama.


If I were in the military I would pick Obama.

i have a friend,he is a career soldier a paratrooper.he said mccain was in a prison camp for too long.doesn't trust him under pressure.

McCain. At least he has seen war.

I don't think someone should be allowed to be president, the commander in chief, if they have never served in the military. How can you lead boys to war if you don't even know how to fire a gun?

Sitting in the oval office and having bamboo shoots shoved up your fingernails is two totally different pressures. :2 cents:

I've been to the camp in Vietnam where McCain was kept. It's a museum now and they kept a lot of the torture devices and rooms. Not a pretty site.

and was caught. A TRUE soldier would have offed himself before being captured.

Um Bush cough cough Bush. Clinton too for that mater.

it doesn't matter if the Prez was in the army or not. Really is some guys experience working in the kitchen for 3 years on some base in Kansas mean anything.

Have you even been to Vietnam? Do you have any idea what those boys were put through? How easy it was to get caught or killed?

PUSSIES kill themselves. Not soldiers. :2 cents:


Bush, Clinton, all of them. None fit in my eyes. I will always stand by my thought that you can't lead a military if you have never served in it.

Cheney was good with a firearm .....

and Bush ( w) had extensive experience :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The president never leads anyone into war. He says go die, and you go. I would rather have an rational, thinking man rather than someone who shoots before he asks questions.

And that's who you want for president? Someone who was physically and mentally tortured?

well i guess we won't have any more presidents since we haven't had a draft in 35 fucking years.

Once again if I served a private for 3 years stateside in the late 80's does that mean I'm more qualfied to be commander in chief? Um no. According to you it does, but it don't.

I'm appalled at your ignorance. I guess that's why you are all adult webmasters.

As if all requirements would be forgotten about if he served. You are complete dip shits for even thinking that. Of course the current requirements would stand, but the would also be required to have served in a high ranking position in the military.

How could you run a kitchen if you didn't know how to cook?

The question was who would you rather go to war with, and there was two options you fucking dick wads. I choose McCain. Then I get comments from tools like "And that's who you want for president? Someone who was physically and mentally tortured". Well, I had to options shit for brains.

Unreal you fucking people.

Who I want for president is someone who will run all of you dumb asses out of business and close down the porn industry. I would help fund that campaign.

Are you envious?

I can run a successfull restaurant ... I pay people to cook ( try to get the best, and use them till burnout ) and to wait on tables :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I didn't say a restaurant. I said a kitchen. Ignorance strikes again, but I'll let it slide for the sake of debate.

The person in control of the kitchen is usually a master chef. Everyone follows his orders, but he knows his shit. He walks the walk and talks the talk. He is a master chef. Applied to the president, you should not have the power to send anyone off to war unless you have come through the ranks and have earned the right to make the call to send boys into harms way. YOU make the call, not advisers who are out for their own agenda.

This argument will go nowhere, as I see it is with Americans. Typical.

Enjoy what's left of your country while it lasts. The rest of the world is laughing at you.

Sorry, I have higher goals then you.....

I'd take Obama over Bill Clinton, but that isn't saying much.

Weren't you the one who called Bush a "here who liberated 30 million people"? :1orglaugh

Why would you say this on a board, you're also looking for work on?

I don't think he's looking for work. All he said was that he's going to be fired soon. Now that I read some of his posts, I'm not surprised.

As far as Commander and Chief goes General is the closest militaristically.


With the exception of Washington Generals tend to make piss poor Presidents :2 cents:

Nice comeback. :helpme

When your in the military, you serve at the pleasure of the President. You don't have much of a choice really.

With that being said..... How can someone who cannot begin to understand the military lead the military?

Not really looking for work. There is more money in mainstream.

I find this board amusing so I come here from time to time. Thanks to Lars for turning me onto it.

Who called Bush a hero?

That's just plain sad. American brainwashing at its best.

They got all those Joint Chiefs of Staff guys to help them

Stupid anonolgy. More correct statement is how can you run a restuarant if you can't cook? Simple I hire the best chefs.

McCain has ZERO experience on economic issues so I guess McCain is disqualified from being president on those grounds then.

if you're going by life experience I guess McCain would be most qualified to run Guantanamo.

It's the chef that runs the kitchen, regardless if he owns the resturaunt or not. The owner is a business man, the chef is a cook that controls the food.

It's a perfect analogy.

No it's not dumbfuck. Is all the president does is run the military or are the other things he does? As I said McCain doesnt have economic experience so he can be president can he?

Are you that stupid to think that the President actually does the planning in war. WTF do you think the generals are for? Kennedy ran PT boat did that make him "qualified" to be commander in chief? No. Truman was private in WWI did that make him qualified? No. Someone like Eisenhower, sure he was qualified.

By the way the two biggest wars we had were the Civil War and WWII and neither Lincoln or FDR had military experience. U.S. Grant did and he is considered one of the worst presidents ever.

quit being a dipshit admit you're wrong on we can all move on.

1. I would rather there were no more wars.

2. I wouldn't go to war with either of them. I'm Canadian. And *IF* I were an American, I'd suspiciously question a President's motivations for even going to war in the first place.

Obama all the way