Terry Richardson shoots Lindsay Lohan
 

http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens...say/00002f.jpg

http://men.style.com/gq/features/lan...d=content_5133

Finally someone does her justice!

Terry Richardson is the man if you dun kno.

I wonder if this has been posted here yet.

she looked terrible in the marylin monroe shoot she did. this girl is not that hot. she also has really gross tits..

Your right he did a good job.

Interesting looking pix

she looks good because she kept her clothes on :2 cents:

agreed, some of those photos are pretty good.

I still think the best is the one posted above though :2 cents:

Some of the best pics I have seen of her.

makes her look very average

heh. :pimp

What's the big deal?

if that's average to you I think I wanna live where you live.... around here "average" is 30lbs overweight and certainly can't be mistaken for hot.

There's a reason why a hot girl is hot.... There has to be an equal number of ugly as shit girls.

One of the girls that used to hang with us look's 90% like Lindsay on those pics, biggest skank I've ever known :P

on camera flash and tabloid mags thrown on a bed is good shots and doing her justice??? OK.. if you say so

Looks like a different girl there..actually hot!

I love the amateurish professional look to the photos. Fucking awesome. I was more porn pics were like that...

I would soo hit it

I like how they put that ad just before the last photo.. good way to market to a captive audience..

good photography makes all the difference

Very cool images, best ive seen her look in an age :thumbsup:thumbsup

i like the amateurish on camera flash lighting he went for - neat to see a celeb slut shot that way.

gingerkids!!!!!

I think a lot of you need to look up who Terry Richardson is.

I first saw his work in Vice magazine's Big Photo Book a year or so ago. He covered most of the photography under the sex section of the book. I can't say I was overly impressed then, and I can't say I'm overly impressed now. i don't find him particularly edgy and talented at all. he just takes grungy pictures of grungy people and things. That is all. Not quite as provocative as people make him out to be in my opinion... :2 cents:

He's the son of a famous fashion photog. He's a snapshot guy.

found in a unrelated search yesterday

http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/image...LOHANVAG24.JPG

http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/image...LOHANVAG23.JPG

i like this one http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens...say/00006f.jpg


and i bet a lot of guys got to see her that way :1orglaugh

the real question is can she suck a good cock ? if she can who gives a shit abou the tits. i mean you going to cum in her mouth so who cares about tits :1orglaugh

wtf those pics look like amateur snapshots in a crack house... i bet it's one of those 'artistic' photographers and he meant to make them look amateuristic. Then why not get an amateur shoot them for free so they look even more amateuristic. to get the exact same effect? Some people...

that chickzverybangable..........

I agree sir.

If her name wasn't in the thread title I wouldn't have a clue who that was!

That's his style. People seem to think it's provocative or something that he takes grungy pictures. I think it's just grungy pictures. The first photos I saw of his were of some worn out prostitutes filming a porno in a sleaze motel. I don't see what's so artsy about only shooting photos that look like they're coming from a crackhouse or a shooting parlor. But hey, who can question a man's "art"?

First pic is hot :)

She's not hot.

in the pic above she looks ok